User talk:Bhaskar sunsari

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Speederzzz. I noticed that you recently removed content from :Yadavs of Nepal without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 10:00, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

:Yadavs were historically considered a low caste due to their association with cattle-rearing, classified under the Shudra varna in the Hindu hierarchy. They lacked scriptural and ruling authority, faced social discrimination, and were categorized as Backward Classes by the British. However, today they are politically influential and claim descent from Lord Krishna, challenging past perceptions. So please add them in middle or lower caste they are not high castes Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 10:06, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

::Do you have a reliable source for this?

::Speederzzz (Talk) (Stalk) 10:17, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

:accept my article sir i have made please 🥺 Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 15:12, 12 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm DoubleGrazing. I noticed that you made a comment that didn't seem very civil, so it may have been removed. Wikipedia is built on collaboration, so it's one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. DoubleGrazing (talk) 09:24, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hi Bhaskar sunsari! I noticed that you have reverted to restore your preferred version of :Yadavs of Nepal several times. The impulse to undo an edit you disagree with is understandable, but I wanted to make sure you're aware that the edit warring policy disallows repeated reversions even if they are justifiable.

All editors are expected to discuss content disputes on article talk pages to try to reach consensus. If you are unable to agree at {{TALKPAGENAME:Yadavs of Nepal}}, please use one of the dispute resolution options to seek input from others. Using this approach instead of reverting can help you avoid getting drawn into an edit war. Thank you. Sarsenet•he/they•(talk) 05:11, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you make personal attacks on other people, as you did at :User talk:Bhaskar sunsari#Mr David Yadav is always spreading fake information about yadavs. Comment on content, not on fellow editors. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 08:05, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Hello, Bhaskar sunsari, welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia, such as {{User|Bhaskar mehta}}. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this, and users who misuse multiple accounts may be blocked from editing. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please disclose these connections. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 07:05, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

:@Bhaskar sunsari, please explain your reasons for creating that new user account? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:27, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

:sir how days i have got to re edit and again sent to you for review i need time to work in it properly 2400:1A00:B1C0:6FE9:446F:BFB3:3C28:95B1 (talk) 16:48, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contribution(s). However, as a general rule, while user talk pages permit a small degree of generali{{#switch:{{{sp}}}|us=z|uk=s|#default=s}}ation, other talk pages are strictly for discussing improvements to their associated main pages, and many of them have special instructions on the top. They are not a general discussion forum about the article's topic or any other topic. If you have questions or ideas and are not sure where to post them, consider asking at the Teahouse. Thanks. Gnomingstuff (talk) 01:00, 23 March 2025 (UTC)

:Sir/ mam my article is not accepted yet 😭 please accept it fast or check it fast Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 17:15, 24 March 2025 (UTC)

mr David Yadav don't you dare to write again yadav into madeshi upper caste again in article ( yadavs of nepal)he wants to spread mis information about yadav caste of nepal .yadav is basically a middle class caste .In Nepal, the Yadav community is often regarded as a middle caste within the traditional social hierarchy. Historically, they have been associated with occupations such as animal husbandry and agriculture, which are typically linked to the Vaishya varna—the third tier in the four-fold Varna system of Hinduism. Check this link alsohttps://joshuaproject.net/contact/general_submit?type=photo&id=16187&ctry=NP but mr David Yadav is spreading fake information about yadav and think he will mislead people but i will not let that happen in Nepal madesh region yadav is considered a middle caste not upper caste and he is always adding it to madeshi upper caste ... Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 02:16, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

why are you reverting it again an again. Is there any more big evidence than whome you also worshiping Yadav Vasidev Shree Krishna. Though god have no caste in spritual world (where we all are sole of god ) but in this material world (brahma universe) he came in Yadava family. Dont revert it again ok. i have no hate with any brahman other caste too. you also know very well how krishna and sudama were. I know kushawaha i also from Solar dynasty so that its also belongs to ksytriya Varna. No fights on this regards Devid yadav (talk) 07:49, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

:then why are you removing before kshatriya from kushwaha section ( caste system in nepal article) Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 08:01, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template. As a new editor you should not be editing any articles covered by this topic. Check an article's Talk page to see if it has been labelled as a contentious topic. ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email · global) 08:57, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Yadav are the madeshi caste why are you removing it??? 2400:1A00:B1C0:251B:AD56:4ADA:1DB7:5365 (talk) 10:19, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Caste system in Nepal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Baniya and Dhankar. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 29 March 2025 (UTC)

:Please don't do this 😭 i know you are angry with me im extremely sorry for that but please don't do this i will do need changes to my page please it will help people of nepal Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 18:48, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

::Once your draft has been rejected and not just declined, that means it is time for you to abandon it and move on. You have been given advice about what to do, but you have ignored all of it. See the comments left in your draft. ~Anachronist (talk) 19:10, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

::I have no anger at you. I have no reason to be angry. I apologise that my words were capable of being understood as anger; I must do better.

::You need to request edits at the real, existing article. I have left you a message below, too 🇵🇸🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 19:15, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

::And apologies if my last edit summary was harsh (I am just catching up on all the updates from overnight Australian time). Tim has given you good advice below – please consider it. We all benefit from stepping back from Wikipedia now and then. — ClaudineChionh (she/her · talk · contribs · email · global) 00:07, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

I am truly sorry about your self declared mental state. I think you may have been over ambitious to edit here while depressed, because it is not a gentle place. Please understand that your self declared mental issues will not cause Wikipedia to lower its article acceptance standards.

I recommend that you do not call yourself a duffer, nor use any insult for yourself. No-one has the right to insult you. That also means you do not have the right to insult yourself.

I see that you have tried hard. I also see a certain unfamiliarity with English. That will not help. But perhaps you might enjoy editing your native language Wikipedia? Please try that. I think you have a lot offer in your native language. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 19:10, 30 March 2025 (UTC)

:This appeared in response to a post on User talk:DoubleGrazing#bro check my draft. I felt it was important to add the context. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoubleGrazing&oldid=1283222144#bro_check_my_draft This is the permalink]] should the thread be archived soon 🇵🇸🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 15:55, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

:I am so disappointed your behaviour. Making disruptive edits was a ludicrous thing to do. Being blocked is really careless. Please learn from this set of errors. 🇵🇸🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦🇵🇸 21:40, 31 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at :Thakuri, you may be blocked from editing. - Arjayay (talk) 09:51, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Stop hand nuvola.svg You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced or poorly sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at :Chhetri. - Arjayay (talk) 09:51, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in :Streams Method in Israeli education, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. See MOS:OVERLINK. CodeTalker (talk) 15:38, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

...be so kind and read our protection policy, thoroughly. Regards. Lectonar (talk) 14:09, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:Ok bro thanks for teaching your fellow brother but bro check once lohar(caste) article it is really disputive Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 14:15, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

Bhaskar, I see that you have [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Bhaskar_sunsari&diff=prev&oldid=1283073109 already been informed] about the special rules that apply to edits related to South Asian social groups, which includes castes. Having looked at some of your recent edits in this topic area, including your reliance on [https://www.eklavya.in/pdfs/Books/SSTP/social_studies_7/histroy/10%20Caste%20System.pdf a middle-school grade textbook] and views expressed about [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bhaskar_sunsari&diff=prev&oldid=1285703889 your own community], may I suggest that you edit articles related on some other, less contentious, subjects where you are less likely to fall afoul of wikipedia policies on sourcing and neutrality? Abecedare (talk) 19:43, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:I will add that restrictions can be imposed upon you under those special rules, like a topic ban. 331dot (talk) 19:47, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:I humbly request you to please unblock me, as I truly believe I haven’t made any fake or disruptive edits. I was only trying to contribute genuinely by adding a demographics section to the Lahan Municipality of Nepal page when I got blocked. I’m really sorry if there was any misunderstanding, and I promise to be more careful with Wikipedia’s guidelines in the future. I’d be so grateful if you could kindly consider my request. Thank you so much for your time. Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 14:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

::For your request to be considered, you must make it as described in the instructions, using the template and then replace the words "your reason here" with your statement. 331dot (talk) 14:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|decline=Given the discussion below, I don't think you're well suited to edit Wikipedia. This being only a temporary block, I'm going to suggest you let it run its course; should you continue editing in the same fashion when this block expires, the next block is likely to be permanent. Your insults and your lack of assuming good faith of other editors leads me also to remove talk page access for the duration of this block. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 21:17, 22 April 2025 (UTC)| reason=I’m truly sorry if there was any confusion with my recent edit, and I humbly request you to please unblock me. I genuinely believe I didn’t make any fake or disruptive changes. I was only trying to add a demographics section to the [Lahan Municipality](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lahan_Municipality) page in Nepal, which I thought would be helpful. In my edit, I mentioned that the Kushwaha and Koeri are the same caste, but I think this might have been misunderstood. To clarify, the [Wikipedia page on Koeri](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Koeri) states they are “also referred to as Kushwaha” in northern India, and the [Bihar Caste Survey 2022-2023](https://thewire.in/caste/bihar-caste-survey-the-whos-who-in-the-data-koeri-kushwaha) treats Koeri/Kushwaha as a single group, noting they’re the one of the largest caste in Bihar with over 5.5 million people. I deeply regret any misunderstanding, and I promise to be more careful and follow Wikipedia’s [editing guidelines](https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Editing_policy) moving forward. I’d be so grateful if you could kindly reconsider my block. Thank you so much for your time and understanding. I believe I was blocked due to a misunderstanding about my edit on the Zamindars of Bihar page, where I noted that Kushwaha and Koeri are the same caste. I intended to provide accurate information, supported by the Koeri Wikipedia page stating they are "also referred to as Kushwaha" in northern India, and the Bihar Caste Survey 2022-2023 listing them as a single group. I deeply regret any confusion, promise to follow Wikipedia’s guidelines more carefully, and kindly request reconsideration of my block. Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 15:10, 22 April 2025 (UTC)}} Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 15:10, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 14:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:I'm not going to review your block myself, given our earlier interactions, but I just wanted to say that you seem to be constantly courting trouble, and doing so in a contentious subject area. You need to rethink your approach to editing Wikipedia, because if you carry on like this you will sooner or later get blocked indefinitely. My suggestion would be to sit out this temporary block, and spend that time reviewing some of our guidelines and policies, both content and behavioural ones, thinking hard about what you need to do differently going forward to avoid being blocked again. That long string of warnings and notices on your talk page, and the fact that this is the second time in a month that you find yourself blocked, is telling you something, you just need to work out what that something is so you can rectify it. Because carrying on like this is not really an option. --DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:03, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

::Please bro unlock me i will follow rules from now Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 15:12, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:::It looks like you used an AI to compose your request- we'd rather hear from you directly. 331dot (talk) 16:50, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

::::I have added kushwaha and koeri are same caste in zamindars of bihar section only koeri was there I added koeri are commonly known as kushwaha and it us 100% true too but he blocked me🥲https://thewire.in/caste/bihar-caste-survey-the-whos-who-in-the-data-koeri-kushwaha please unblock me i not not forget to add source before editing from now in even in small edit too Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 16:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:::I don't know what others think but I think that at least part of being unblocked will require you to agree to a topic ban from editing about any caste, broadly construed. 331dot (talk) 16:53, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

::::No bro i was im hurry to complete 500 edits milestone so I didn't add source even it was not wrong edit kushwaha and koeri are same caste give me one chance from today i will provide source then i will edit even a single text Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 16:57, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::So basically, you're gaming the system by making trivial, often incorrect edits to achieve those 500 edits. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:01, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::I was in hurry that's mine mistake i admit it give me one chance i will achieve 500 edits but with fully sourced and reliable edits only i promise Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 17:03, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::ihavent done fake edits bro they are true and real kushwaha are commonly known as koeri in bihar they are same caste but in hurry i forget to add source that's my mistake https://thewire.in/caste/bihar-caste-survey-the-whos-who-in-the-data-koeri-kushwaha check this link both are same Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 17:05, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::Why do you want to achieve 500 edits? 331dot (talk) 17:19, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::::I want to contribute to Wikipedia and at least 500 edits will show I have done some contribution. brother unblock na me please i will dont do any edit without source from now i promise Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 17:24, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::We would prefer that you take your time to make an edit; 50 well-done edits are better than 500 poorly done edits. 331dot (talk) 17:29, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::Ok bro but unblock me please Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 17:35, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::My suggestion would be that you not address people as "bro".

:::::::::::I think we'll need some consensus amongst admins here; you'll need to agree to a topic ban from editing about castes or other South Asian social groups, for starters. 331dot (talk) 17:38, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::::Im sorry i again said you bro 😔 its our culture im used to it im sorry for that Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 17:43, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

But bro im asian myself i feel connected to asian edits but how much time that ban will be if i agree?? Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 17:40, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:Until you demonstrate yourself capable of editing here without causing problems like what led to this block. There's no time limit; your behavior is the sole determinant. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆𝄐𝄇} 17:48, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:: Hi {{ping|Bhaskar sunsari}} – There are several ongoing concerns regarding your editing. Despite previous warnings and a short block, you’ve continued to make unsourced and malformed changes across multiple articles. In discussions here and on various article and draft talk pages, it appears that you often disregard feedback from other editors and focus solely on implementing your preferred changes. [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Rajendra_Mahato&diff=prev&oldid=1285921236] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft_talk:Kushwaha_community_of_nepal] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Kushwaha#Request_to_remove_%22Shudra_varna%22_classification_for_Kushwaha_community] [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Ethnic_groups_in_Nepal]

:: Additionally, it seems that some of your responses have been generated using AI, and unfortunately, a number of these have been either awkward or inaccurate. Please be reminded that competence is required to contribute effectively to the English Wikipedia, and that you've been asked several times by multiple contributors not to rely on ChatGPT or other LLMs to write your posts.

:: I’m concerned that given these patterns, similar issues will likely persist once your current block expires. At this stage I'm proposing to extend this block indefinitely to limit further disruption. Would you be open to contributing to another Wikipedia project in your native language? Regards, Yamaguchi先生 (talk) 17:49, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:::this means you are not giving me a chance?? And you say About rajendra mahato mahato is a common surname of kushwaha caste in nepal i can provide source too i have done mistake editing without source that doesn't mean i cant have a chance. I was in hurry that's my mistake Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 18:02, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:::Endorse an indef block. I agree that you might be more comfortable editing the Wikipedia of your primary language. 331dot (talk) 18:36, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

::::Ya being older Wikipedia user you guys thing you guys are the owner of Wikipedia every body speak same language thinking you guys are superior nobody is perfect people learn from mistakes nobody is perfect albert einstein was one of the duffer students. But now whole word knows him never underestimate anyone .i think im wasting my time begging for you guys to unblock me because you guys are heartless unsupportive and think others are useless ok you have authority to suprees me here you can because you guys have power here 🙏 ram ram ( take care)..... Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 19:26, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::Descending into unfounded personal attacks only demonstrates that the block is correct. This isn't about power or thinking we are superior. We don't. It's not about your different background. This is about your disruptive behavior. 331dot (talk) 19:38, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::Put me in jail i have done a huge crime 😔 im disputive i misbehaved kings of Wikipedia you guys have already blocked me that means I won't disturb you guys for few months now be happy you have shown your power on power less new user ok bro , uncle i don't know your age good bye take care Bhaskar sunsari (talk) 19:47, 22 April 2025 (UTC)