User talk:Bo2pup

:Thank you so much. :) Bo2pup (talk) 16:34, 9 September 2024 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

:@SafariScribe Thanks a lot. I will prefer to keep using Wikipedia:Articles for creation till I am confident enough to have my own publication, would that be alright? Bo2pup (talk) 18:19, 30 October 2024 (UTC)

::Perfectly ok. Cheers! Safari Scribe^{Edits! Talk!} 03:48, 31 October 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello Bo2pup. The nature of your edits, such as the one you made to :Daniel W. Nebert, gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being employed (or being compensated in any way) by a person, group, company or organization to promote their interests. Paid advocacy on Wikipedia must be disclosed even if you have not specifically been asked to edit Wikipedia. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially serious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat search-engine optimization.

Paid advocates are strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists. If the article does not exist, paid advocates are strongly discouraged from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Bo2pup. The template {{tl|Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{tlc|paid|2=user=Bo2pup|3=employer=InsertName|4=client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 23:00, 4 November 2024 (UTC)

:Greetings @Russ Woodroofe, hopefully you are doing well. Firstly, I don't have any conflict of interest (COI) with Daniel W. Nebert's page. Secondly, you have removed my edits which I believe to be in accordance to Wikipedia norms and policies, as far as I know. Kindly refer to the following, and guide me if I am wrong:

:1) Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics)#Selected publication section in professor articles

:2)User:StarryGrandma/Writing an article about a professor or researcher#Step 1. Start the article (For article's structure)

:Thirdly, I am citing the following pages as a reference to creating a "Selected Publication Section"

:David A. Hafler

:Rae Langton

:John Swinton (theologian)

:Catherine L. Besteman#

:Fourthly, I used Google Scholar as a reference to the selected publication, as mentioned above, it is not necessary to cite any reference to publication, as by definition, "Selected Publication Section" is comprise of most cited publication.

:Lastly, you also reverted my edits last Saturday (according to the country I live in)... as far as I know, "National library of Medicine", "NIEHS News", and "Research.com" are independent platforms. However, you removed them under "rm repeated ref; rm self-published memoirs with no apparent reviews", Kindly explain.

:P.S. I do understand that I am new here and have a lot to learn, I also, understand that my understanding of the policies are not as strong as yours, as you are more senior than me.

:Thank you. Bo2pup (talk) 01:02, 5 November 2024 (UTC)

::Apologies for slow response -- real life interfered. The article could support a "Selected publications" section. My main concern is that the section you added was overlong, with no clear selection criterion. About 3 articles, with a selection criterion could be appropriate. The award section should contain only career highlight awards. It was significantly trimmed (with good reason) when the article was at AfD. It is possible that it could be expanded slightly, but I think you should open a talk page discussion before doing so. I am doubtful about several of the awards you added. Russ Woodroofe (talk) 08:56, 9 November 2024 (UTC)

:::No worries, I understand. Well, my selection criteria was the same as mentioned in Wikipedia talk:Notability (academics)#Selected publication section in professor articles. I used the most cited articles first then decending order from there. This is why I also cited Google scholar, as there is the number of citation given. So, if there is no issue with Publication section, can I restore it?

:::As for the awards' section, I will open a discussion on the talk page. I do understand that I am new here, and my understanding of the policies would not be as good as someone experienced like you.

:::I apologize for any inconvenience. Thank you.

:::P.S. I will restore the publication section in few hours, and will mention this discussion on the talk page. Bo2pup (talk) 20:31, 11 November 2024 (UTC)

::::Can you tell me how you stumbled upon the Nebert article? Russ Woodroofe (talk) 17:36, 12 November 2024 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, Bo2pup. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Numrud Muhatasov, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 14:10, 25 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, Bo2pup. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Matchpoint NYC, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:10, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello, Bo2pup. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Matchpoint NYC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3AMatchpoint+NYC request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 06:39, 1 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, Bo2pup. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Brock Walker, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:07, 12 May 2025 (UTC)