User talk:ButOnMethItIs

{{#if:|

Mmmm meth... but what on meth is? C6541 (T↔C) 09:28, 7 March 2010 (UTC)

:What on meth is not? ButOnMethItIs (talk) 22:35, 11 March 2010 (UTC)

thx Seelefant (talk) 22:09, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

I don't want to get into an edit war, so I won't undo your reversion right away. However, I don't see why you should automatically have the article your way.

:There is an active and on-going discussion which you are part of. At the very least, your removal of that content is premature. ButOnMethItIs (talk) 16:50, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

::Leaving it without the offending link is a better default position.128.118.147.160 (talk) 17:03, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

:::No, it's not. The link adds value to the article and you haven't presented a single policy-based reason why the link should be removed. ButOnMethItIs (talk) 17:05, 26 July 2010 (UTC)

Good day sir. Sorry but I don't understand why my information improvement into the Stalker Film wiki page has been considered as Vandalism. I've just added information about a possible Stalker film based on the game (which has components from the film) and about a nice project which will be able to be watched in English too... I've even add references and links to prove the information veracity. Can you please reconsider your decision and undo the edition?

As for the S.T.A.L.K.E.R. Games, STALKERHispano is a Spanish Community checked world wide, so I bet yes, it's an very important link even for an English user (we often translate some exclusives news or interviews into English).

Anyway, if I'm wrong (I've studied English but of course I can't understand it as a native), good job ;)

Good Day! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.33.144.177 (talk) 21:37, 5 September 2010 (UTC)

:Sorry, I saw the name "Uwe Boll" in the most recent edit and I hit the vandalism rollback button. I should have looked more carefully and used the regular rollback button. But STALKERHispano is not a reliable source of information and we don't usually link to fansites (#11). Also, nothing you posted was related to the 1979 Stalker film. If you find reliable sources for a future S.T.A.L.K.E.R. film, please see about adding the information to S.T.A.L.K.E.R.: Shadow of Chernobyl#Legacy. ButOnMethItIs (talk) 08:40, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Dade: I see, thanks you for your time! About a STALKER film, google 'Monolith's Whisper'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.33.144.177 (talk) 14:35, 6 September 2010 (UTC)

Why do you consider it original research? ViperSnake151  Talk  14:59, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

:The rationale is laid out on that article's talk page. The OR template now points to the section. ButOnMethItIs (talk) 15:02, 26 August 2011 (UTC)

{{talkback|Talk:United_States_diplomatic_cables_leak|Censorship|ts=23:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)}}

causa sui (talk) 23:15, 3 September 2011 (UTC)

Don't add template for WP:VER where it's easy to find sources for one of classic games of Atari, Thanks. Sir Lothar (talk) 21:39, 11 January 2012 (UTC)

Just a quick note to remind that WPVG doesn't assess redirects. I've fixed up [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:F1_2001_(video_game)&oldid=487327790 this edit]. :) Salvidrim! 14:11, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

For two things really. First of all thank you very much for the attention you've been giving to the sources-related discussion at WT:VG/S. I notice you're targeting the ones that haven't yet been discussed this go-around so you're really helping where it's needed. Thanks very much for that. The other thing I wanted to say thanks for is in sourcing the SF-1 SNES TV and the C1 NES TV articles with that recent Plunkett review on Kotaku. I'd been hunting for a ref for the magazine screenshot tidbit for quite a while now. So thanks for finally getting it squared away. Cheers, -Thibbs (talk) 22:12, 16 April 2012 (UTC)

• I've been seeing you around WP:VG a lot for months, how the heck are you only totalling some ~2000 edits?! O.o Salvidrim! 20:14, 25 April 2012 (UTC)

Image:Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, talk pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at :Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2012 May 23, is considered bad practice, even if you meant it well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 14:34, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

:Sorry. I don't know what I was thinking there. ButOnMethItIs (talk) 14:43, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

Image:Information.svg Please do not delete or edit legitimate talk page comments, as you did at :Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Video games. Such edits are disruptive and appear to be vandalism. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. C3F2k (Questions, comments, complaints?) 17:02, 23 May 2012 (UTC)

{{User:CaseyPenk/T/Platform !voting}} CaseyPenk (talk) 16:24, 13 June 2012 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Video games/Newsletter/20130403}}

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:10, 24 November 2015 (UTC)