User talk:Buxtobe

:Dear HickoryOughtShirt?4,

:Thank you for reviewing my article. However, I am completely at a loss as to why “submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources.”

:All my sources are correct and the "necessary information can be verified.”

:I have also adhered to the Wikipedia standards and formats for “Referencing for beginners and Citing sources”, as can be seen from the few corrections made by other reviewers, who had nothing to criticize.

:So could you please be more specific about what you think is missing from the article or what needs to be corrected so that it can be approved.

:Thank you very much for your information and

:best regards

:Buxtobe Buxtobe (talk) 06:13, 17 April 2025 (UTC)

:: Hi Buxtobe. Numerous article sections have no sources, such as "Main areas of research" and "Professional activities". On Wikipedia, everything must be cited to a reliable source. Also, the "other reviewers" are bots, so they do not typically comment on the state of an article. HickoryOughtShirt?4 (talk) 21:05, 18 April 2025 (UTC)

:::Hi HickoryOughtShirt?4,

:::thank you very much for your tips. I have added the reliable sources you recommended in the appropriate places and published the text for the submission.

:::I hope that everything is now in place. If anything is missing or needs to be changed, please let me know.

:::Otherwise, I wish you a happy Easter and

:::best regards

:::Buxtobe Buxtobe (talk) 07:43, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

:Hello Johannes,

:first of all Happy Easter and then thank you for your kind words and question about the reason for publishing the article.

:We think that this article about Mr. Wessling on the English Wikipedia page is important and informative. He is known in the USA and Canada and English-speaking countries through his numerous entrepreneurial activities and his commitment to the complex species conservation project “Whooping crane” with “Operation Migration” and the “International Crane Foundation” and Wikipedia users should be given the opportunity to obtain further information.

:Have a nice Sunday and

:with best regards

:Dirk Buxtobe (talk) 10:28, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

:Dear Kovcszaln6,

:thank you for your criticism of the submitted article.

:I have added the “published, reliable secondary sources” you requested in the appropriate places.

:I have also used existing Wikipedia entries on the person, as this is in line with Wikipedia's guidelines, see “Guidelines”: Wikipedia articles are generally based on material from reliable secondary sources.”

:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dispersion_(Chemie): “There are some studies on the structure of dispersions (emulsions)” -> Wessling, Bernhard (April 1993). “Dissipative structure formation in colloidal systems”. Advanced Materials. 5 (4): 300-305. doi:10.1002/adma.19930050418. ISSN 0935-9648.

:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Polyaniline: “Polyaniline dispersions stabilized with surfactants or dopants have been commercially available since the end of the 1990s.” -> Wessling, Bernhard (2010). “New insights into the morphology and structure of organometallic polyaniline”. Polymers. 2 (4): 786-798. doi:10.3390/polym2040786.

:https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Conductive_polymer: “Experimental and theoretical thermodynamic evidence suggests that conductive polymers can even be completely and in principle insoluble, so that they can only be processed by dispersion.” Wessling, Bernhard (2000). in: Nalwa, H.S. (ed.). Handbook of Nanostructured Materials and Nanotechnology. Vol. 5. New York, USA: Academic Press. S. 501-575

:I hope that this now meets the high standards and “show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article” if the person has already been mentioned in three other Wikipedia articles.

:If you need further secondary sources, I can of course add them.

:With best regards

:Buxtobe Buxtobe (talk) 20:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

::{{Ping|Buxtobe}} Hi, please note that Wikipedia is not a reliable source, so please remove those. Also, please look into our guidelines on the notability of people. Thanks. Kovcszaln6 (talk) 08:15, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Hi Kovcszaln6,

:::I am very surprised that Wikipedia itself cannot be a secondary source, given the high standards that are set here for the submission of an article.

:::However, I have read through the “guidelines on the notability of people” and added further reliable secondary sources.

:::So I hope that everything is now in order and the article can be approved.

:::Best regards

:::Buxtobe Buxtobe (talk) 10:47, 10 May 2025 (UTC)