User talk:CYl7EPTEMA777#Birds

|style="width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|

|}

|}

Hi, thanks for your contribution to wikipedia. I agree to your wording on talking birds. Utter is better. It's unfortunated you came across DrChrissy and her gang who like to play politics. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Animal_welfare&oldid=589097911#Welfare_is_attitude Many editor's have raised concern of conflict of interests and ownership of DrChrissy].

124.149.103.50 (talk) 00:15, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

:::Dear CYl7EPTEMA777, I am writing to ask you to delete this thread fromm your Talk page. The editor that posted these totally unfounded accusations against me is an IP hopper that has been extremely disruptive and uncivil in the past to me and other editors. Because of their IP hopping, it is extremely difficult to trace their postings. The editor has received at least 3 blocks in the past. As a note to the IP hopper who posted this thread, out of respect for CYl7EPTEMA777, I will not reply to anything more you post on here. Thank you CYl7EPTEMA777 for considering the deletion.__DrChrissy (talk) 19:22, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

::::1)responses to DrChrissy's propaganda: [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:AslanEntropy&oldid=589503082#Thank_You Here is one reason I don't use an account].

::::2)'unfounded accusations'? Facts/evidences speak for themselves. In addition to her disruptive editing in talking birds. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Animal_rights&diff=590816478&oldid=590761537 DrChrissy also revert valid contribution of CYl7EPTEMA777 in animal rights].

::::3)[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Marian_Dawkins&oldid=589502685#Animal_welfare DrChrissy don't respect other editors], her gang has tried to remove my communication with other editors on multiple occasions, recent talk page history of 'animal welfare', 'pain in animals' and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Marian_Dawkins&oldid=589668148 Marian Dawkins], and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AAslanEntropy&diff=589505038&oldid=589503082 talk page of user AslanEntropy] are some examples. Because they are afraid of public scrutiny.

::::4)you can take the WP:COI,WP:OWN, disruptive editing etc of DrChrissy to [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_noticeboards noticeboards].124.170.234.133 (talk) 23:44, 19 January 2014 (UTC)

::::5)When people disagree with DrChrissy, you will often asked to discuss it. However discuss is often an excuse to protect DrChrissy's edits. Because the page will always protect her desired version, and a consensus can never be reached because DrChrissy will insist her edits. This happened many times in the past, read recent talk page history of 'animal welfare', 'pain in animals', [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Marian_Dawkins&oldid=589668148 Marian Dawkins] you will see why 124.170.234.133 (talk) 00:04, 20 January 2014 (UTC)

:::::If he continues close articles then i ask the administrator his ban CYl7EPTEMA777 (talk) 13:52, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

:::::::Okay, I book marked your talk page, you can leave me notes here.124.168.2.239 (talk) 00:11, 23 January 2014 (UTC)

:::::::::1)I saw talking bird's is open, I think changed mimic to utter is still a better option. Generlization of mimic is simply wrong.

:::::::::2)I would like to have your opinions of disruptive edits of DrChrissy and her gang on animal welfare. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Animal_welfare&oldid=592251129 Here is two major problems I identified]. 124.170.226.136 (talk) 00:32, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

:::::::::3)I just noticed Johnuniq, a gang member of DrChrissy, removed [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ANeutral_point_of_view%2FNoticeboard&diff=592153138&oldid=592138771 my reports of their misconducts in NPOV noticeboards]. I thought you may be interested in this case too. 124.170.226.136 (talk) 00:58, 25 January 2014 (UTC)

:::::::::::register-CYl7EPTEMA777 (talk) 08:23, 7 February 2014 (UTC)

::::::::::::I restored your tag in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talking_bird&diff=595671035&oldid=595667459 talking birds]. But it was removed even it was clear on talk page many think mimic is wrong. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 124.168.30.60 (talk) 02:28, 16 February 2014 (UTC)

::::::::::::*Hello, [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:PraetorianFury#DrChrissy.27s_records_of_COI_OWN_and_lies PraetorianFury had similar negative experience with DrChrissy], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DrChrissy&oldid=596784860#I_smelled_BS_and_you_fought_to_keep_it. His talk with DrChrissy]

::::::::::::*There is an [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research/Noticeboard#Marian_Dawkins_COI_editor_adding_OR original research case about DrChrissy on the noticeboard].

::::::::::::*I am still working on the wrong generalization of talking birds.124.149.66.255 (talk) 04:26, 25 February 2014 (UTC)

• Hi, it's not very convenience to talk to you because they keep removing my messages
• I saw the article you created in the sandbox, well done, thank for your contribution to wikipedia.
• [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Timelezz#DrChrissy.27s_records_of_COI_OWN_and_lies timelezz is having similar experience of talk page censorship because of DrChrissy]
• have a nice day 124.168.54.131 (talk) 00:40, 26 February 2014 (UTC)

Hey CYl7EPTEMA777

I'm sending you this because you've made quite a fewedits to the template namespace in the past couple of months. If I've got this wrong, or if I haven't but you're not interested in my request, don't worry; this is the only notice I'm sending out on the subject :).

So, as you know (or should know - we sent out a centralnotice and several watchlist notices) we're planning to deploy the VisualEditor on Monday, 1 July, as the default editor. For those of us who prefer markup editing, fear not; we'll still be able to use the markup editor, which isn't going anywhere.

What's important here, though, is that the VisualEditor features an interactive template inspector; you click an icon on a template and it shows you the parameters, the contents of those fields, and human-readable parameter names, along with descriptions of what each parameter does. Personally, I find this pretty awesome, and from Monday it's going to be heavily used, since, as said, the VisualEditor will become the default.

The thing that generates the human-readable names and descriptions is a small JSON data structure, loaded through an extension called TemplateData. I'm reaching out to you in the hopes that you'd be willing and able to put some time into adding TemplateData to high-profile templates. It's pretty easy to understand (heck, if I can write it, anyone can) and you can find a guide here, along with a list of prominent templates, although I suspect we can all hazard a guess as to high-profile templates that would benefit from this. Hopefully you're willing to give it a try; the more TemplateData sections get added, the better the interface can be. If you run into any problems, drop a note on the Feedback page.

Thanks, Okeyes (WMF) (talk) 22:18, 28 June 2013 (UTC)

:okъ --CYl7EPTEMA777 (talk) 13:53, 21 January 2014 (UTC)

May I suggest that you review, or have someone with an understanding of English review for you, WP:COMPETENCE. Among those I've seen, the percentage of your statements on talk pages which have a possible meaning in English number less than 10%; those with a possible meaning with a connection to reality (or Wikipedia guidelines) is even smaller. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 05:50, 1 March 2014 (UTC)

::*This is not what happened. DrChrissy and her gangs disagree with CYl7EPTEMA777 most of times. Which means they had no problem understood him at most of the time.

::*I am just wondering, if Arthur Rubin is also in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Timelezz&oldid=597320318#Censored_comments_on_admin_noticeboard Drmies' sockpuppet farm]. 124.170.229.124 (talk) 21:11, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Talking bird (cognition) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Dbrodbeck (talk) 22:39, 4 March 2014 (UTC)

Image:Ambox notice.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding your recent edits and block threats regarding "Talking bird"-named articles. The thread is User:CYl7EPTEMA777, blocking threats, and disruptive edits on Talking bird and related articles. Thank you. —Steel1943 (talk) 21:00, 7 March 2014 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox

|Hi. An editor has opened an investigation into sockpuppetry by you. Sockpuppetry is the use of more than one Wikipedia account in a manner that contravenes community policy. The investigation is being held at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/CYl7EPTEMA777, where the editor who opened the investigation has presented their evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to investigations, and then feel free to offer your own evidence or to submit comments that you wish to be considered by the Wikipedia administrator who decides the result of the investigation. If you have been using multiple accounts (in a manner contrary to Wikipedia policy), please go to the investigation page and verify that now. Leniency is usually shown to those who promise not to do so again, or who did so unwittingly, but the abuse of multiple accounts is taken very seriously by the Wikipedia community.{{#if:| I am One of Many (talk) 17:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)}}

|File:Puppeter template.svg

}} I am One of Many (talk) 17:33, 8 March 2014 (UTC)

:Category:Project Koko, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. I am One of Many (talk) 20:36, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svgTemplate:Great apes intelligence has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. I am One of Many (talk) 20:47, 9 March 2014 (UTC)

Hey, I noticed that at one point you had moved this template to "Andromeda Galaxy" (as it should be) but for some reason it is now "Andromeda galaxy." Could you help me move it to "Template:Andromeda Galaxy?" Italia2006 (talk) 02:10, 10 March 2014 (UTC)

Hello. There is a dispute-resolution case about your on the noticeboard 124.168.48.21 (talk) 04:20, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

File:Peacedove.svg

This message is being sent to let you know of a discussion at the Wikipedia:Dispute resolution noticeboard regarding a content dispute discussion you may have participated in. Content disputes can hold up article development and make editing difficult for editors. You are not required to participate, but you are both invited and encouraged to help find a resolution. The thread is "Marian Dawkins".

Please join us to help form a consensus. Thank you! EarwigBot ^{operator / talk} 04:31, 16 March 2014 (UTC)