User talk:Clayoquot#top
{{busy}}
- /Archive 1
- /Archive 2
- /Archive 3
- /Archive 4
- /Archive 5
- /Archive 6
- /Archive 7
- /Archive 8 (2021)
- /Archive 9 (2022)
- /Archive 10 (2023)
[[Talk:Hydrogen safety]]
Blackberry Page
Hello! I'm brand new to Wikipedia editing, but I discovered some plagiarism on the Blackberry page. The entire section under "Plants" comes from this blog post: https://creaseymahannaturepreserve.org/blackberris-vs-raspberries/. I saw in the Talk page that you hosted a Wiki-athon and worked on this page, so I'm thinking it may have come from the newbies. Could you let me know how this should typically be handled by an editor? Thank you! Shaynaalice (talk) 23:08, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
| style="background-color: #fdffe7; border: 1px solid #fceb92;"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | The Civility Barnstar |
| style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Congratulations, I am awarding you with a Barnstar of Civility for interfering in Conflict of interest discussion between me and another editor. I am sure she's good at handle such issues and judging accurately with civility and just. Uncle Bash007 (talk) 12:50, 2 May 2024 (UTC) |
:Thanks Uncle Bash007! Clayoquot (talk
Administrator Elections: Updates & Schedule
| style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |Administrator Elections | Updates & Schedule |rowspan=3|File:Ballot box icon color.svg |
* Administrator elections are in the WMF Trust & Safety SecurePoll calendar and are all set to proceed.
|
| colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list. |
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 10 September 2024 (UTC)
Quote on User:Clayoquot
hi @Clayoquot – the quote you're displaying at the top of User:Clayoquot from @DGG strongly speaks to me. Thank you for sharing it and @DGG, thank you for offering this perspective to the Movement ^ _ ^
By the way, I arrived here through the conversation you started about automatic citation generation. PPelberg (WMF) (talk) 18:36, 3 October 2024 (UTC)
:Thanks for your note and for bringing back good memories of DGG. Take care, Clayoquot (talk
::You too ^ _ ^ PPelberg (WMF) (talk) 03:34, 4 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrator Elections: Call for Candidates
Administrator Elections | Call for Candidates
The administrator elections process has officially started! Interested editors are encouraged to self-nominate or arrange to be nominated by reviewing the instructions at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Call for candidates.
Here is the schedule:
- October 8–14 - Candidate sign-up (we are here)
- October 22–24 - Discussion phase
- October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
Please note the following:
- The requirements to run are identical to RFA—a prospective candidate must be extended confirmed.
- Prospective candidates are advised to become familar with the community's expectations of adminstrators, which are much higher than the minimum requirement of having extended confirmed status. This includes reviewing successful and unsuccessful RFAs, reading the essay Wikipedia:Advice for RfA candidates, and possibly requesting an optional poll on their chances of passing.
- The process will have a one week call for candidates phase, a one week pause to set up SecurePoll, a three-day period of public discussion, followed by 7 days of no public discussion and a private vote using SecurePoll.
- The outcomes of this process are identical to making requests for adminship. There is no official difference between an administrator appointed through RFA or administrator elections.
- Administrator elections are also a valid means of regaining adminship for de-sysopped editors.
Ask any questions about the process at the talk page. A separate user talk message will be sent to official candidates with additional information about the process.
To avoid sending too many messages, this will be the last mass message sent about administrator elections. If you are interested in the process, please make sure to watchlist the appropriate pages. A watchlist notice will be added when the discussion phase opens, and again when the voting phase opens.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrator Elections: Discussion phase
Administrator Elections | Discussion phase
The discussion phase of the October 2024 administrator elections is officially open. As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- October 22–24 - Discussion phase
- October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
- November 1–? - Scrutineering phase
During October 22–24, we will be in the discussion phase. The candidate subpages will open to questions and comments from everyone, in the same style as a request for adminship. You may discuss the candidates at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Discussion phase.
On October 25, we will start the voting phase. The candidate subpages will close again to public questions and discussion, and everyone will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 22 October 2024 (UTC)
Administrator Elections: Voting phase
Administrator Elections | Voting phase
The voting phase of the October 2024 administrator elections has started and continues until 23:59 31st October 2024 UTC. You can participate in the voting phase at Wikipedia:Administrator elections/October 2024/Voting phase.
As a reminder, the schedule of the election is:
- October 25–31 - SecurePoll voting phase
- November 1–? - Scrutineering phase
In the voting phase, the candidate subpages will close to public questions and discussion, and everyone who qualifies for a vote will have a week to use the SecurePoll software to vote, which uses a secret ballot. You can see who voted, but not who they voted for. Please note that the vote tallies cannot be made public until after voting has ended and as such, it will not be possible for you to see an individual candidate's tally during the election. The suffrage requirements are different from those at RFA.
Once voting concludes, we will begin the scrutineering phase, which will last for an indeterminate amount of time, perhaps a week or two. Once everything is certified, the results will be posted on the main election page. In order to be granted adminship, a candidate must have received at least 70.0% support, calculated as Support / (Support + Oppose). As this is a vote and not a consensus, there are no bureaucrat discussions ("crat chats").
Any questions or issues can be asked on the election talk page. Thank you for your participation. Happy electing.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 25 October 2024 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
| style="margin: 1em 4em;" |
| style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello Clayoquot! The thread you created at the Teahouse, {{tq|Sfn error}}, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please {{Edit |1=Wikipedia:Teahouse |2=create a new thread |section=new |preload=Wikipedia:Teahouse/Preload |preloadtitle=Follow-up to Sfn error}}. See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by {{noping|lowercase sigmabot III}}, and this notification was delivered by {{noping|KiranBOT}}, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:25, 31 October 2024 (UTC) |
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:13, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
{{-}}
Precious anniversary
{{User QAIbox/auto|years=Six}}
--Gerda Arendt (talk) 08:53, 9 December 2024 (UTC)
:Thank you Gerda! Clayoquot (talk
Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Carbon capture and storage]]
Hi there, I'm pleased to inform you that I've Talk:Carbon capture and storage/GA1{{!}}begun reviewing the article Carbon capture and storage you nominated for GA-status according to the criteria. File:Time2wait.svg This process may take up to 7 days. Feel free to contact me with any questions or comments you might have during this period. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 03:02, 4 January 2025 (UTC)
Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Carbon capture and storage]]
The article Carbon capture and storage you nominated as a good article has been placed on hold File:Symbol wait.svg. The article is close to meeting the good article criteria, but there are some minor changes or clarifications needing to be addressed. If these are fixed within 7 days, the article will pass; otherwise it may fail. See Talk:Carbon capture and storage and Talk:Carbon capture and storage/GA1 for issues which need to be addressed. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 14:04, 5 January 2025 (UTC)
FAR for [[Hydrogen]]
I have nominated Hydrogen for a featured article review here. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets the featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" in regards to the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. 🍕BP!🍕 (🔔) 03:53, 14 January 2025 (UTC)
Your [[WP:Good articles|GA]] nomination of [[Carbon capture and storage]]
The article Carbon capture and storage you nominated as a good article has passed File:Symbol support vote.svg; see Talk:Carbon capture and storage for comments about the article, and Talk:Carbon capture and storage/GA1 for the nomination. Well done! If the article is eligible to appear in the "Did you know" section of the Main Page, you can nominate it within the next seven days. Message delivered by ChristieBot, on behalf of Esculenta -- Esculenta (talk) 17:23, 15 January 2025 (UTC)
:Thank you! This has been a fun and informative process. I hope we cross paths again. Clayoquot (talk
::Congrats @Clayoquot! A long road to get here but glad that it got over the line. PutTheKettleOn (talk) 08:00, 20 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Thank you! Clayoquot (talk
deletion at wp:FTN about geoengineering
Instead of deleting the convo, could you close the convo itself, contact the admin who was rev-deleting the outing material, and let them handle it? would be better for logging, and i saw admin still left the entire ANI up still.
thank you! Bluethricecreamman (talk) 02:35, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
:pinging @The_Bushranger about it as well to rev-del FTN for anything that outs. I dont think i see any i think, but just pinging just in case. Bluethricecreamman (talk) 02:39, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
::I flagged down an admin on IRC and they rev-deleted it. Take care, Clayoquot (talk
:::Thanks for getting to this - should probaby have it oversighted too. - The Bushranger One ping only 03:29, 17 January 2025 (UTC)
ANI topic
Hi Clayoquot, regarding Proposal: Topic ban for EMsmile, could you please use
:Will do. Thanks for letting me know!! Clayoquot (talk
:I haven't used these templates before. I looked into this and I think adding these templates could make things more cluttered and even harder to follow. I've added [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents#Proposal%3A_Topic_ban_for_EMsmile a small note to the comment whose original location is ambiguous]. Does this solve the problem? Clayoquot (talk
::Yes thanks, it seems clear who the original reply was to now, even if that note should be signed and disconnected from the comment itself (to avoid accusation of editing others comments, ie at the top with the other one. CNC (talk) 19:02, 21 January 2025 (UTC)
:::Glad to hear it's clear now. The comment it runs into is from user:Clayoquot and I believe she is fine with my addendum :) Clayoquot (talk
Discussion at [[:Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase III/Administrator elections]]
Administrator Elections | Renewal RFC phase
File:Symbol watching blue lashes high contrast.svg You are invited to join the discussion at :Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase III/Administrator elections.
You're receiving this message because you signed up for the mailing list. To opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the list.
Incidents noticeboard discussion
File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding another editor you have interacted with. The thread is Dustfreeworld's editing of project-space pages. The discussion is about the topic :Wikipedia:POV railroad. — Newslinger talk 16:59, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
:Thanks @Newslinger for letting me know. I noticed that in the AN/I thread, you said Femke escalated the closure to WP:AN. In fact I was the one who escalated it, so you might want to fix that in your comment. I'll think about commenting. Take care, Clayoquot (talk
::I've corrected the statement. Thank you for letting me know. — Newslinger talk 19:43, 28 April 2025 (UTC)
A kitten for you!
Thank you for reviewing my study on Wikipedia use! I was delighted (and surprised) to see it highlighted in this month's Research Newsletter. I've had to step away from Wikipedia editing, but I'm still exploring its role as a health information resource. All the best!
Mcbrarian (talk) 15:51, 12 May 2025 (UTC)
:Hi Denise! Thanks for stopping by! I'm glad to hear you're still doing Wikipedia research. Looking forward to reading what you publish next :) Clayoquot (talk