User talk:CloudNine#File:NirvanaSmellsLikeTeenSpirit.ogg listed for discussion

Unfortunately, the article is once again receiving heavy vandalism from IP users. If it isn't too much trouble, could you perhaps protect it again? NSR77 ^T_C 04:05, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

I noticed that you deleted the Alphaman article on July 12, 2007. I looked up what "prod" meant in this context. Am I correct in assuming that you proposed deletion of the article, then no one responded within 5 days, so you went ahead and deleted it?

The fact that it wasn't a long article, that if I'm correct in assuming that no one objected within 5 days, and the fact that it took me 8 months to realize it was deleted seems to confirm that it wasn't notable.

Still, I think it's notable in relation to the rouge-like games. And I'm asking now because today there was some information I remember was on the Wikipedia page and no where else.

I was going to ask if the page was truely deleted everywhere, but while I was looking I found the page archive on the Internet Archive http://web.archive.org (and found the information I was looking for). So now I'm more just asking if it was deleted simply because it was short and no one objected to its deletion.

I'm not sure exactly what the issue is you're tackling at the TFA requests talk page, but if you can't watch the page constantly (to do . . . whatever it is you need to do), I can handle that for you. It'd be nice to have Surfer Rosa appear on the Main Page for its 20th anniversary, and you've been long overdue an appearance there (For comparison's sake, I've had two articles appear on the Main Page already. This was back when we could nominate any article, and I personally nominated neither. Odd that.). WesleyDodds (talk) 06:57, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

:There's my three official current projects (In Utero, Definitely Maybe, and Britpop), but I get distracted easily. As a result I've done a lot of work on Bauhaus (band). There's a few more Replacements articles I should send you. Remind me to if I don't e-mail them to you over the weekend. WesleyDodds (talk) 22:05, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

::I just listed my support for Surfer Rosa, by the way. If you have time, could you take a look at Vitalogy? I think we can list it for a Good Article nomination soon; it just needs some tweaking. WesleyDodds (talk) 11:12, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

For the third time, I would like to know if you are abandoning the Persian Gulf mediation. It seems to have foundered with the dispute unresolved, and at least two other editors are misconstruing the notes from the mediation. If you are unable or disinterested in remaining involved, please let me know, so we can resubmit to mediation. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 22:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

: I disagree, the current mediation shouldn't be abandoned. We were closer to a resolution than ever, before Arcayne all of sudden abandoned the discussions. However, a solution is still not out of reach. --Sia34 (talk) 22:49, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

::Then you are far ore optimistic than I, as I haven't really seen any compromise from any of your edits in the article, discussion or mediation, as that is somewhat the intention of mediation. Also, might I trouble you to avoid stalking my edits? It's kinda creepy. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 22:58, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

::: You haven't seen any compromise from me? I am the one who introduced a compromise version, which everyone was OK with BUT you. If you were willing to compromise and hadn't abandoned the discussions, there would be a solution by now, and I am not the only one who is saying that. It's still not too late, you can still show that you're willing to compromise by resuming the discussions on the mediation, rationalizing your objections and bringing counter-proposal until there is an agreement. And how am I "stalking your edits" exactly? I am simply leaving a message for the mediator. --Sia34 (talk) 23:27, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

::::I'm happy to resume mediating the dispute. (Arcayne, I may have missed your messages on the mediation; if so, I'm sorry! I haven't been on here as much recently, but I should be back to normal editing levels now.) Do you we all agree to resume on the current mediation page? CloudNine (talk) 23:30, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

::::: Thank you very much CloudNine, I do agree with the resumption of the current mediation. --Sia34 (talk) 23:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

:As do I. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 23:45, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

::Ready when you are, Cloudnine. - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 21:16, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Really nice article here...a great read. Congrats on the TFA! dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 09:51, 20 March 2008 (UTC)

WesleyDodds and I had the idea of a Radiohead taskforce. He told me that you would be the person to talk to in setting one up, as you have set up all the other ones. Could you please help? Ka5hmir^Talk _To ^Me! 10:41, 27 March 2008 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject_Alternative_music/Newsletter/March 2008}}

If you missed last the previous newsletter, you can find it at Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music/Newsletter/February 2008.
You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (talk) 09:36, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

I've only heard the singles, although I might get a cheap copy soon. "Supernatural Superserious" sounds better if it's on the radio surrounded by lesser tunes. "Hollow Man" sounds good when you get to the chorus, though (at least judging from the live performances on YouTube). WesleyDodds (talk) 23:14, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

:By the way, editing Accelerate (R.E.M. album)‎ has been consistently frustrating. You really have to go through pages of history and the archived talk page to get the full story, but suffice it to say it's taken a lot of work to try to shape the article into something decent while constantly running into problems. Funny thing is, I haven't even heard the album yet. WesleyDodds (talk) 06:02, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

I only had to do a little bit of prose tweaking on Double Nickels on the Dime (unfortunately couldn't find more references). It's definitely ready for GAC; go ahead and nominate it. WesleyDodds (talk) 03:13, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

:By the way, I'm confused by this: "Several songs on Double Nickels on the Dime were outsourced to or inspired by contemporaries, such as Black Flag's Henry Rollins and Jack Brewer of Saccharine Trust." WesleyDodds (talk) 03:17, 24 April 2008 (UTC)

::Put it up for GA! WesleyDodds (talk) 22:13, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

A recent post seems to pretty much seal the deal on adding the term. What do you think of The controversy over the name of the Arabian Gulf / Persian Gulf? - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 04:31, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

: How does that post "seal the deal" about anything? I think you should re-examine it more closely, it's just a bunch of rants and original research added by a Pan-Arabist who needs to be reminded that Wikipedia is not a soapbox.--Sia34 (talk) 04:58, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

::Sigh. Then Sia, I urge you to go to the page an discuss the matter there. Had you actually read all of my post, you would have seen that the point of the post was to have Cloudnine check it out for themself. And please, stop tossing around labels, Someone could easily salp you with the label, Pan-Iranist. He isn't soapboxing; he is presenting info. Maybe you could actually read it before dismissing it? - Arcayne (^{cast a spell}) 05:04, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

::: I did read it, it's propaganda, soap-boxing, and nothing more. "He is presenting info"? Whose info? His own original research? I don't see a single verfible source in that post. --Sia34 (talk) 05:10, 25 April 2008 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject_Alternative_music/Newsletter/April 2008}}

You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (talk) 08:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

I've re-started the process here and am notifying the four candidates for director as well as advertising at FLC talk and FAC talk. Your input would be valued. TONY (talk) 05:24, 3 May 2008 (UTC)

Since you are a member of WikiProject Economics, I would like to direct your attention to Wikipedia:WikiProject Economics/Featured Article drive. We are currently deciding on an economics-related article to bring to Featured Article status and we would like your input. Thanks! Gary King (talk) 15:18, 12 May 2008 (UTC)

just to let you know i have reverted your your revision you failed to address the issue on the talk page there has been an on going disscusion there,as an administrator you should know better than to just revert without a disscusion please see grunge talk page and please do not do any further revisions without a disscusion as an administrator you are not suppose to show a bias one way or another but i can clearly see there is a click like mantality and a unwillingness to work with other people who have issues on alternative music pages smells like article ownership happening--Wikiscribe (talk) 04:18, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

me and dodds had come to some sort of consenus that is why i suggested that you should have gone to the talk page and would see--Wikiscribe (talk) 22:34, 21 May 2008 (UTC)

A lot of other users have been less active (NSR77) or disappeared (Brandt Luke Zorn). I was pretty busy in April so my editing dropped off drastically as well. April was the first month in over a year with no alt-rock articles promoted to FA staus. However, we're trying to turn that around this month, and there's already some FAs and FLs for May (in particular, check out "Touch Me I'm Sick"). If you're interested in cleaning up some Pearl Jam articles and getting them to GA status, that would be great; User:-5- has done a lot of work on them, and we've already pushed Ten and Vitalogy to GA status. By the way, the last issue of Spin I bought (R.E.M. on the cover) has a Kim Deal interview, so let me know when you get the urge to work on that article again, and I'll help you out. WesleyDodds (talk) 23:24, 26 May 2008 (UTC)

:"In Bloom" became a GA a few hours ago. WesleyDodds (talk) 11:27, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music/Newsletter/May 2008}}

You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 07:24, 1 June 2008 (UTC)

Please explain why you reverted the redirects that I put in place for the following songs

• Tame (song)
• Dead (Pixies song)
• Crackity Jones

As I explained in the edit summary, they all fail Wikipedia:Notability_(music)#Songs, and thus do not require articles. Regards Nouse4aname (talk) 15:03, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

: From the link above... "Most songs do not merit an article and should redirect to another relevant article" and "Songs that have been ranked on national or significant music charts, that have won significant awards or honors or that have been performed independently by several notable artists, bands or groups are probably notable". None of these songs charted, and there is no assertion of significance for any of them. Generally album-tracks are not notable enough to require a separate article, regardless of what information you can find. Such information should be incorporated into the album article, if anything. Nouse4aname (talk) 15:30, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

:: But you have failed to assert any significance or notability for any of the songs. Nouse4aname (talk) 15:35, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

::: OK, fair enough if you are confident of that, but I want to see three featured articles by Friday! Happy editing... Nouse4aname (talk) 15:39, 28 June 2008 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Alternative music/Newsletter/June 2008}}

You are receiving this newsletter because you have signed up for WikiProject Alternative music. If you wish to stop receiving this newsletter, or would like to receive it in a different form, add your name to the appropriate section here. This newsletter was delivered by the automated Giggabot (stop!) 07:25, 2 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi CloudNine. I was in the process of categorizing Wikipedia:Manual of Style updates, but noted that it doesn't seem to have much activity. If you would like to have it speedy deleted, please add {{tl|db-author}} at the top of the page. Otherwise, please add the category Updates to the bottom of page. Thanks. Bebestbe (talk) 19:01, 12 July 2008 (UTC)

Hi,

I tried to make some corrections on the Pixies article that were overturned by you and I just wanted to go into some details to maybe hammer this out.

Kim Deal stated in numerous interviews that she was not responsible for the content/lyrics/any songwriting of any of the songs other than the two (unless you count Levitate Me, a multi-credit one that shifted later, three) songs in which she was credited for songwriting. In fact, she said they never talk/talked about the lyrics at all, and she had to learn them by listening to him (radio interview on TLM tour??) It therefore seems unlikely to me to think that a change in the songwriting and subject matter had anything to do with her. On the contrary, Charles (Black Francis) talked about in his Melody Maker tour diary about writing the new songs on tour and wondering what type of response they might get from their other fans. It's also worth noting that several other songs regarding aliens etcetera had been recorded before Bossanova (Manta Ray, Into the White etcetera).

That being said, Kim did express in interviews a frustration at being marginalized in other ways, like not having as many backup vocals to sing (most of the songs w/prominent vocals on BN and TLM were ones that were written/arranged before the recording of the album, i.e. Dig For Fire, Subbaculta)

I think that is a much clearer way of presenting the information.

24.22.170.115 (talk) 19:36, 14 July 2008 (UTC)Sean R

I know you aren't too active right now, but I'm sure we'd all appreciate your input here. WesleyDodds (talk) 08:21, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

SoxBot II (talk) 03:13, 31 July 2008 (UTC)

I pretty sure I explained to him why he doesn't need to do this. I thought he had stopped. Go ahead an tell him again if need be. It wa pretty annoying when he copied the project layout and then just copied and pasted alt-rock WP and Metal WP FAs and FLs onto the WP Rock front page. WesleyDodds (talk) 07:01, 3 August 2008 (UTC)

:Reminder that I have a Kim Deal Spin article from this year. Or, if you want to hold off a little longer on that, there's been some vague talk between a few of us at getting MTV Unplugged in New York to FA, possibly in time to appear on the front page to mark the 15th anniversary of the performance. WesleyDodds (talk) 09:12, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for unblocking me. really appreciate it. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 16:10, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

I do live in California, but I'm actually on vacation at the moment. I was in Chicago the last week or so and right now I'm in Seattle. I'm going to London in a couple of days and then to New York (where I'm originally from) for another couple of days before I'm due back in LA for school and stuff. If you're taking a road trip, I highly suggest you (when you come to the West Coast) go to Big Sur. I've gone there for years and it's an amazing place. Absolutely serene. Thanks for the offer; I'll drop you a line when it's done. On another note, where have you been for so long? NSR77 ^T_C 23:32, 4 August 2008 (UTC)

:Well, it seems like Disintegration is finally done. Are you still willing to look it over? Oh, and "Monkey Gone to Heaven" is a disturbing, but impeccably crafted work of art. NSR77 ^T_C 03:26, 20 August 2008 (UTC)

As you said "Yes, but the alternative wikiproject is the more specific of the two", thats wrong when it comes to Queens of the Stone Age related articles, One genre has something to do with alternative rock, while three genres which is in scope of the rock project. If its goin to be specific the rock music project should be added. I can find reliable sources if you want to. I'm not adding it before this discussion over okay. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 13:06, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Why duid you revert my edit on the Template:WikiProject New Wave music? --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 18:30, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

Okay thanks. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 18:42, 5 August 2008 (UTC)

::::I'm replacing the alternative wikiscope with the rock scope on the queens of the stone age articles cause of this discussion Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Alternative music#Queens of the Stone Age scope where i've got to supports. --Be Black Hole Sun (talk) 04:41, 6 August 2008 (UTC)

Image:Info non-talk.png:Category:Pixies, which you created, has been nominated for deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Occuli (talk) 15:56, 25 August 2008 (UTC)

I've started work on Sub Pop. I'm focusing on the basics for now, so there's a lot of things to fill in when you can get around to it. WesleyDodds (talk) 05:58, 28 August 2008 (UTC)

SoxBot II (talk) 21:36, 4 September 2008 (UTC)

Have you seen this news yet? If you aren't too busy with the non-Wiki world, can you select versions of your FAs and GAs that have made the selected queue? WesleyDodds (talk) 05:39, 22 September 2008 (UTC)

SoxBot II (talk) 19:57, 3 October 2008 (UTC)

{{user|Be Black Hole Sun}}

If you don't want to be a member of this project anymore remove your user name from the project page.

25px Thanks for uploading :Image:The Replacements 1985 promo.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 03:35, 19 October 2008 (UTC)

The Main Page Redesign proposal is currently conducting a straw poll to select five new designs, before an RFC in which one will be proposed to replace the Main Page. The poll closes on October 31st. Your input would be hugely appreciated! Many thanks, Pretzels^Talk! 10:09, 28 October 2008 (UTC)

SoxBot II (talk) 02:44, 2 November 2008 (UTC)

Have a [http://books.google.ie/books?id=CU1jKq0TlvQC&pg=PA70&lpg=PA70&dq=Grindle+%2B+teen+idels+%2B+left&source=bl&ots=1itZKJyO8B&sig=y4N5e6gJP8bdAXFfoWhw7M7EXHI&hl=en&sa=X&oi=book_result&resnum=3&ct=result look]. Ceoil (talk) 13:53, 29 November 2008 (UTC)

SoxBot II (talk) 02:53, 10 December 2008 (UTC)

I was working on a "company page" and I wanted to make sure several Wikipedia admins would approve the page. Whenever you have time, could you give me some pointers on how to improve the page? The page has to go through a DRV before it can get back up. Any feedback is much appreciated!

The page: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Coaster7/Love_Systems

Thanks in advance.

Coaster7 (talk) 01:19, 18 December 2008 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading :Image:HereComesYourManVideo.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 16:47, 22 December 2008 (UTC)

Hey there. I understand that you were working on the Friends article last year and attempted to get it into shape. :) Well, I have begun working on it, User:Cornucopia/Friends, but it is a mess right now. If you want to help, please feel free, but if you don't really want to, I was wondering if you have any leftover sources that I could use, especially filming information in the apartments. Thanks, Corn.u.co.pia / Disc.us.sion 13:56, 23 December 2008 (UTC)

SoxBot II (talk) 17:39, 2 January 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading :Image:MonkeyGoneToHeavenVideo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this image on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the image description page and add or clarify the reason why the image qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for images used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the image does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 19:48, 10 February 2009 (UTC)

SoxBot II (talk) 03:07, 1 March 2009 (UTC)

Are you ever going to finish up the rest of those Pixies album articles? WesleyDodds (talk) 10:23, 25 March 2009 (UTC)

SoxBot II (talk) 02:07, 6 April 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading :File:PixiesVelouriaVideo.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:56, 27 April 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I've noticed that you've been heavily involved in the Pixies articles and though I'd let you know that I've uploaded a new image of the band to commons - :file:Pixies 2004.jpg. Do you think it should be used to replace the non-free image currently being used on Pixies? --JD554 (talk) 08:51, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

SoxBot (talk) 10:50, 5 May 2009 (UTC)

Hello, I hope you are doing well. I am sending you this message since you are listed as a GA reviewer. I would like to invite you to consider helping with the GA sweeps process. Sweeps helps to ensure that the oldest GAs still meet the criteria, and improve the quality of GAs overall. Unfortunately, last month only two articles were reviewed. This is definitely a low point after our peak at the beginning of the process when 163 articles were reviewed in September 2007. After nearly two years, the running total has just passed the 50% mark. In order to expediate the reviewing, several changes have been made to the process. A new worklist has been created, detailing which articles are left to review. All exempt and previously reviewed articles have already been removed from the list. Instead of reviewing by topic, you can consider picking and choosing whichever articles interest you.

We are always looking for new members to assist with the remaining articles, so if you are interested or know of anybody that can assist, please visit the GA sweeps page. In addition, for every member that reviews 100 articles or has a significant impact on the process, s/he will get an award when they reach that threshold. If only 14 editors achieve this feat starting now, we would be done with Sweeps! Of course, having more people reviewing less articles would be better for all involved, so please consider asking others to help out. Feel free to stop by and only review a few articles, something's better than nothing! Take a look at the list, and see what articles interest you. Let's work to complete Sweeps so that efforts can be fully focused on the backlog at GAN. If you have any questions about the process, reviewing, or need help with a particular article, please contact me or OhanaUnited and we'll be happy to help. --Happy editing! Nehrams2020 (talk • contrib) 07:08, 16 May 2009 (UTC)

SoxBot (talk) 10:50, 4 June 2009 (UTC)

SoxBot (talk) 22:44, 4 July 2009 (UTC)

Thank you for uploading :File:This Ain't No Picnic.png. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator within a few days in accordance with our criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. Stifle (talk) 11:59, 8 July 2009 (UTC)

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:Alternative rock/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 18:09, 19 July 2009 (UTC)

I have conducted a reassessment of the above article as part of the GA Sweeps process. I have found some concerns with the referencing which you can see at Talk:Kurt Cobain/GA1. I have placed the article on hold whilst these are fixed. Thanks. Jezhotwells (talk) 16:42, 26 July 2009 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Law/JD curriculum task force/invitation}}Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 20:24, 2 August 2009 (UTC)Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 04:45, 4 August 2009 (UTC)

SoxBot (talk) 08:03, 6 August 2009 (UTC)

Hi, I nominated this file for deletion as replaceable. Regards Hekerui (talk) 09:44, 1 September 2009 (UTC)

SoxBot (talk) 15:21, 7 September 2009 (UTC)

It was recently de-listed as not being good enough, but I have worked a lot on the article and have cleaned lots of things the de-listing reviewer had problems with. Could I ask you to review it again for a GA rating? Thanking you in anticipation, --andreasegde (talk) 01:35, 16 October 2009 (UTC)

Hello there. Sorry to bother you, but you are (titularly at least) a member of WP:WikiProject Economics, as defined by this category. If you don't know me, I'm a Wikipedia administrator, but an unqualified economist. I enjoy writing about economics, but I'm not very good at it, which is why I would like to support in any way I can the strong body of economists here on Wikipedia. I'm only bothering you because you are probably one of them. Together, I'd like us to establish the future direction of WikiProject Economics, but first, we need to know who we've got to help.

Whatever your area of expertise or level of qualification, if you're interested in helping with the WikiProject (even if only as part of a larger commitment to this wonderful online encyclopedia of ours), would you mind adding your signature to this page? It only takes a second. Thank you.

Message delivered on behalf of User:Jarry1250 by LivingBot.

{{#if:|User:{{{2}}} has|I have}} nominated Pixies for a Wikipedia:Featured article review/{{#if:Pixies/archive1. Please join the discussion on whether this article meets featured article criteria. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. If substantial concerns are not addressed during the review period, the article will be moved to the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Delist" the article's featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 19:12, 26 November 2010 (UTC)

As you are either a participant of WikiProject or the October wikification drive or have signed up to participate in the planned December drive, this probably concerns you. Discussions that have been inactive for a couple weeks regarding the December drive have been reactivated, and we would like you to participate in these discussions, and also consider joining the December drive. We have taken upon ourselves a massive workload, encompassing a backlog reaching June 2008 and comprising {{PAGESINCATEGORY:All articles that need to be wikified}} articles. Barnstars will be awarded to participating editors, and also, please invite your friends to join! Please do not reply to this message here. Either reply here, here or here.

For the December Drive Coordinators, {{User|WikiCopter}}.

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 23:28, 29 November 2010 (UTC).

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject_Wikify/Drives/Invite}}

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 18:34, 30 November 2010 (UTC).

{{Mbox

|type = notice

|image = 50px

|style = background:LightYellow; border: 1px solid gold; font-weight: normal;

|text = This is an important message from WikiProject Wikify.

You are currently listed as a member of WikiProject Wikify. As agreed upon by the project, all members will be required to confirm their membership by February 1, 2010. If you are still interested in assisting with the project, please add yourself to the list at this page—this will renew your membership of WikiProject Wikify.

Thank you for your support,

WikiProject Wikify

}}

Delivered by MessageDeliveryBot on behalf of WikiProject Wikify at 19:27, 22 December 2010 (UTC).

Hello! This is a note to let the main editors of this article know that it will be appearing as the main page featured article on April 18, 2011. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/April 18, 2011. If you think it is necessary to change the main date, you can request it with the featured article director, {{user|Raul654}}. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions of the suggested formatting. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page so Wikipedia doesn't look bad. :D Thanks! Tbhotch* ^{۩ ۞} 17:55, 13 April 2011 (UTC)