User talk:CoffeeKing

Hi,

You've been doing great work on the article. However, the section headings Who can apply for coal allocation?, Who decides who receives a coal allocation?, What criteria are used in making the decision?, How well has the allocation process worked?, Did the Government have the authority to auction the coal?, How big were the "windfall gains" accruing to the allocatees? are perhaps inappropriate for an encyclopedic article. Also, there is some essay/news like tone. I suggest putting these sections under one main section of CAG Report. If you can, I need you to work on it. Harsh (talk) 11:17, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

Hi Harsh. I think you're right. I thought I would write just a quick note and it soon got a bit more complex. I'm working on the articulation and hopefully will have something a little more shipshape over the next few days.

:Great going. Your work on the article is definite and appreciable. {{smiley}} Harsh (talk) 15:10, 9 September 2012 (UTC)

As I said earlier, you are doing great work on the article. However, you need to be a little cautious regarding the templates you put in the article. As in [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indian_Coal_Allocation_Scam&diff=511833849&oldid=511833695 here], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indian_Coal_Allocation_Scam&diff=511705757&oldid=511705329 here], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Indian_Coal_Allocation_Scam&diff=511697279&oldid=511696783 here]. Also before saving the changes see the preview or use your sandbox. You don't provide edit summaries too often. The only ones I see are the default ones. Edit summaries are very important. It is always better to compile all the information you want to add first (in your sandbox or somewhere else) and then make one single edit, rather than making 10 or 20 small edits. Harsh (talk) 12:29, 11 September 2012 (UTC)

Harsh. Good thoughts. Thanks for the guidance. I'll get to work in the sandbox now!

Harsh, that is very kind of you. Thank you. CoffeeKing (talk) 22:58, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello. I'm new to the wiki community and would like to start working on editing the property insurance page with the help and collaboration of more experienced contributors. Do you think you can help me?Lgkkitkat (talk) 17:37, 9 May 2014 (UTC)

Perhaps my initial request was too vague. There is a recomendation that the Chartis article be merged with AIG's page. I think the Property Insurance page could be strengthened with parts of AIG's page since it shows how current events and emerging trends effect it's regulation by the government. Hurricane Sandy and updated payouts of the WTC are not on the Property Insurance page either - which to me seem to be relevant. Do you think adding more information would be beneficial to the Property Insurance page? If so would you be interested in collaborating what facts should be included? Any response would be kindly appreciated. Thank you.Lgkkitkat (talk) 17:51, 14 May 2014 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:31, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

Hey there!

I just re-launched the WikiProject Investment.

The site has been fully revamped and updated and I would like to invite you the project.

Feel free to check out the project and ping me if you have any questions.

Cheers! WikiEditCrunch (talk) 19:10, 22 August 2017 (UTC)