User talk:ComplexRational#top

{{troutme}}

{{Talk header|search=yes|disclaimer=yes}}

{{User talk}}

{{User:MiszaBot/config

| archive = User talk:ComplexRational/Archive %(counter)d

| algo = old(30d)

| counter = 14

| maxarchivesize = 80K

| minthreadsleft = 4

| minthreadstoarchive = 1

| archiveheader = {{Automatic archive navigator}}

}}

June 11: Virtual NYC WikiWednesday

style="border:1px solid #6881b9; margin:0.5em; padding:0.5em;border-radius: 8px;"
colspan=2 style="font-size:150%; padding: .4em;"|June 11: WikiWednesday Salon (Virtual)
style="padding-left: .6em;" |

File:Wikimedia New York City logo.svg

You are invited to join the Wikimedia NYC community for our virtual WikiWednesday Salon. This month's WikiWednesday will be fully online and focused on Wikimedia global trends, neutral point of view, and the Wiki Loves Pride campaign for Pride Month. No experience of anything at all is required. All are welcome!

Meeting info:

All attendees at Wikimedia NYC events are subject to the Wikimedia NYC Code of Conduct and Photography Policy.

(You can subscribe/unsubscribe from future notifications for NYC-area events by adding or removing your name from this list.)

--Wikimedia New York City Team via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:04, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Consensus was delete, but page wasn't deleted

Hi Complex, in November this [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Redirects_for_discussion/Log/2024_November_3#Wikipedia:WikiProject_Baronage_of_Scotland Redirect discussion was decided as delete]. But the page was redirected rather than deleted [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:Daniel_Plumber/sandbox/WikiProject_Baronage_of_Scotland to here]. I found it strange that it was still up as there was consensus on delete so I tagged it as CSD thinking it got forgotten. If I am missing something please ignore. Nayyn (talk) 23:07, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{re|Nayyn}} The project page was merely a redirect and did not have substantial page history; the redirect actually was deleted and not recreated. Whenever a redirect is sent to WP:RFD, only the status of the redirect is discussed, and the outcome of a discussion has no implications for the target page. Along the same line of reasoning, a redirect being deleted as an implausible typo would naturally not imply that the (correctly-spelt) target article should be deleted.

:That said, I declined your speedy deletion request: WP:CSD#G4 requires substantially identical content in both a deleted and recreated page. Feel free to let me know if you have any other questions. Cheers, Complex/Rational 23:28, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Administrators' newsletter – June 2025

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2025).

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

  • An RfC is open to determine whether the English Wikipedia community should adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and its affiliates.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

  • An arbitration case named Indian military history has been opened. Evidence submissions for this case close on 8 June.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:16, 6 June 2025 (UTC)}}

Recent AfD

Thank you for closing the AfD for Jared Safier. Now, upon review, I discovered that this page has been deleted several times for advertising and self-promotion, as evident in the deletion log. Would it be possible to put a lock on the page, to prevent it from being created yet again? BOTTO (TC) 00:55, 21 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{re|Botto}} It was actually only created and deleted twice at that title, once in 2014 and once a few days ago, so creation protection is not necessary. Creation protection usually is only applied for pages with bad titles that are repeatedly created, and it does not prevent recreation at a different title. Complex/Rational 22:57, 23 June 2025 (UTC)