User talk:Conversion script
{{User:ClueBot III/ArchiveThis
| age=8760
| archiveprefix=User talk:Conversion script/Archive
| numberstart=1
| maxarchsize=75000
| header={{Automatic archive navigator}}
| minkeepthreads=5
| minarchthreads=2
| format= %%i
}}
{{Talk header|custom_header=Note: This user appeared to create many articles, when it in fact just transferred them (see user page). Therefore, the mostly automated messages appearing below are mostly irrelevant.}}
"[[:First Gulf War]]" listed at [[Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion|Redirects for discussion]]
The redirect [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=First_Gulf_War&redirect=no First Gulf War] has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at {{slink|Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2024 April 29#First Gulf War}} until a consensus is reached. Elli (talk | contribs) 17:32, 29 April 2024 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:WiMAX]]
The article :WiMAX has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
This article is misleading, failing to mention that this is obsolete technology that ultimately lost a format war to 4G and 5G networks. It's haphazardly structured, reads like an advertisement in places, and more concerningly, has had update templates saying it's overly jargon-heavy since 2010 (14 years!!) and needs update since 2019 (5 years ago). Many of the sources are from the 2000s and it's full of references to future deployments which almost certainly don't exist. It could be a candidate for rewriting rather than deletion, but frankly, I suspect it's so much work it'd be faster to start again from scratch.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.
This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:01, 24 June 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of [[:Gallifrey]] for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gallifrey until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Good article reassessment for [[Actinide]]
Actinide has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 23:51, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Good article reassessment for [[Bouldering]]
Bouldering has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Z1720 (talk) 22:07, 30 December 2024 (UTC)
Nomination of [[:Just another Perl hacker]] for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Just another Perl hacker (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Nomination of [[:Closed (poker)]] for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Closed (poker) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
Good article reassessment for [[Iblis]]
Iblis has been nominated for a good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article. Launchballer 16:59, 4 June 2025 (UTC)