User talk:Coolwriterman12

==Welcome!==

Welcome to Wikipedia, Coolwriterman12!

Here are some links to help you along:

If you need help, then feel free to {{edit|Special:MyTalk|ask for help on your talk page|section=new|preload=Help:Contents/helpmepreload|preloadtitle=Help me!}}. Have a great Wiki-Day. Adakiko (talk) 03:18, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

November 2024

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm JacktheBrown. I noticed that you recently removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. JacktheBrown (talk) 19:02, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

yay

i am a pro ggamer! :DDDD [https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/gaming/resources/want-pro-gamer.html]https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/gaming/resources/want-pro-gamer.html Coolwriterman12 (talk) 19:15, 29 November 2024 (UTC)

May 2025

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Bunnypranav. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :UserBenchmark, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Until you have sources, do not add the content. ~/Bunnypranav:<ping> 10:06, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

Nomination of [[:Weed Hack Premium Beta (Internet Phenomenon)]] for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Weed Hack Premium Beta (Internet Phenomenon) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Weed Hack Premium Beta (Internet Phenomenon) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 19:46, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

[[UserBenchmark]]

Your edit included your assessment; e.g. wp:editorializing / wp:original research (OR). If CPUPro is {{tq|...a reviewer known for publishing outspoken and often controversial assessments...}}, such analysis needs to be from a cited wp:RS. Please do not add your own assessment. Questions? I would recommend asking at the wp:Teahouse. Thank you Adakiko (talk) 03:17, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

BTW: Your edit to Libertarian socialism made {{diff||prev|1290083923|here}} was {{diff||next|1290217933|deleted here}} with an wp:ES of {{tq|rv: Unsourced analysis of an editor(s).}} That was unsourced wp:OR. Please note that Wikipedia is not a publisher of original thought (boring! but necessary for wp:verifiability, etc.) Write a book on the topic, get it accepted as RS and then it will be quoted on Wikipedia. Or be like me and not write a book and tell others to write a book... Cheers Adakiko (talk) 03:29, 25 May 2025 (UTC)