User talk:Cprgibson623

Image:Copyright-problem.svg

This is an automated message from MadmanBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of :Peter Baugher, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.sw.com/?t=3&A=457&format=xml&stylesheet=bio.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) MadmanBot (talk) 13:20, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello Cprgibson623,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Peter Baugher for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{urlencode:Talk:Peter Baugher}}&action=edit§ion=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 13:22, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello Cprgibson623,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged :Peter Baugher for deletion, because it seems to be inappropriate for a variety of reasons.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Talk:Peter_Baugher&action=edit§ion=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 14:16, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Hello, Cprgibson623,

I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Peter Baugher should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Peter Baugher .

If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

Thanks, Barney the barney barney (talk) 14:46, 29 March 2013 (UTC)

Image:Information.svg Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with :Peter Baugher. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion, which appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the article. Please note that this applies whether or not you are logged in to the account you used to create the page. JamesBWatson (talk) 22:40, 30 March 2013 (UTC)