User talk:DBishop1984

Hi DBishop, Good work on the Four article - I saw your edits yesterday and was going to thank you then, but ran out of time. A lot of people had been adding to the controversy section (so its obviously a running issue), but nothing was being referenced (which you've now fixed). I had my attention drawn to the page as a vandalfighter (I'm not in a country where Four exists), as it looked like the PR department of the company who make Four were doing a bit of censorship. Along with Josie, there were two other editors (an ip and the nicely named Phusionmarketingasst) that have made no edits to wikipedia apart from removing critical info from the page. As far as I can see; with your improvements, there needs to be a good argument for the removal of criticism. Its probably worth watching the page to see if the unexplained blanking continues... Thanks for your work on this, cheers Clovis Sangrail (talk) 22:37, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

::Ps. I hope you didn't mind me switching your COI warning to the blanking warning- I had already warned Josie for possible COI (still on the talk page), but she(?) persisted in blanking the sections with no edit summaries as to why. Clovis Sangrail (talk) 22:47, 10 November 2010 (UTC)

DBishop, absolutely I think images of Woodruff's medal and the current display would be great for both Woodruff's article and the article on Hillman Library. Thank you in advance for uploading them! CrazyPaco (talk) 22:31, 25 October 2011 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)