User talk:DMacks#Signature fix.

{{User:MiszaBot/config

|archiveheader = {{talkarchivenav}}

|maxarchivesize = 80K

|counter = 67

|algo = old(14d)

|archive = User talk:DMacks/Archive %(counter)d

}}

{{talkheader}}

Erich Clar page

I want to include a synthetic reaction that is known as Clar's reaction. It is of a certain class of cyclic ketones that condense with themselves when heated to 400 C in a mixture of zinc dust and zinc chloride.

thumb

I will add references and a description of what it is used for in synthesizing new polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons.

[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Sex, Love, Misery: New New York]]

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Sex, Love, Misery: New New York has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable, see Talk page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

PEPCON Disaster

Hi DMacks. I would like to disagree with your assessment that the YT links are reliable. According to WP:NOYT and WP:COPYLINK, Youtube links should be by the primary publisher or a reliable secondary publisher. If the video is not affiliated with the original publisher, as is likely in this case, it probably violates copyright and should not be linked per WP:COPYLINK. You are free to disagree, this was just my reasoning for marking the sources. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 15:59, 13 May 2025 (UTC)

:I agree that YouTube content is often suspicious. Anyone can post anything...possible reliability problem for works created by the uploader and possible copyvio problem for works created by others. But those are two independent and sometimes mutually exclusive problems. An authentic copy is not actually "created" by the uploader, but instead its reliability depends on who the creator actually is. The citation should point to the original, to the extent it's known, just like we cite an actual book or journal article rather than the database or library that gave us access. So I disagree that a YT clip of a commerical broadcast is generally a reliability problem. Look at my later edits, where I found a more complete version that even more strongly confirms the claims (and provides more detail). However, you're right that because it is a copyvio, it should not be linked. Fixed. DMacks (talk) 07:02, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

::You make fair points. Generally I wouldn't say people falsify this stuff because it serves no purpose, but either way thanks for acknowledging my point about copyvios. Yes I am a nerd -XCBRO172 (How could you tell?) 06:08, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-21

MediaWiki message delivery 23:09, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

Tech News: 2025-22

MediaWiki message delivery 20:02, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

This Month in Education: May 2025

[[AN/WQX-2]]

Hi DMacks, you made an edit remark on the AN/WQX-2 article on 25 August 2022 saying you felt the article meets WP:GNG. This article caught my attention last summer and I finally seem to have time to put some effort into editing it. In your edit remark, you quoted some report apparently, but I’m struggling to find the source. Do you happen to recall where you found that? — TadgStirkland401 (TadgTalk) 03:00, 28 May 2025 (UTC)