User talk:Darwgon0801

|style="width: 50%; border:0; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|

|}

|}

File:Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed maintenance templates from :Miss Universe. When removing maintenance templates, please be sure to either resolve the problem that the template refers to, or give a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, as your removal of this template has been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Legacypac (talk) 18:36, 11 January 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Filipinos, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Victoria Park. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 16 January 2016 (UTC)

Thanks for [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Lupang_Hinirang&curid=72526&diff=731050524&oldid=730127225 this correction]. I ought to have looked more carefully. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 02:21, 23 July 2016 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Darwgon0801. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Someone is deleting infobox without reviewing or checking the sources before they conducting a deletion in a particular section WP:VERIFIABILIY i warned him/her but he/she still keep reverting and editing the sections specially the infobox of the Kingdom of Tondo, so i need help to what should we do or where to go to resolve this issue thanks! (Theseeker2016 (talk) 13:03, 10 April 2017 (UTC))

This problematic edtitor once again reverted the work without reading or checking again the cited references not even consulting the board , he/she even putting maintenance tags which in the area with containing a legit citations / sources from the books and questioning the verifiability of LCI just like it was a unreliable or a Hoax this user also branded. Here i restored again the infobox. i hope you find a way again to restore the places and other parts on the previous version again thank you ! (Theseeker2016 (talk) 01:46, 13 April 2017 (UTC))

• By the way , where should we go to file a complains for this editor ? ( i'm just a new user here) (Theseeker2016 (talk) 02:19, 13 April 2017 (UTC))

Hello for the previous days i observing stricnina he/she is look like a puppet of some user which advocating the Ultra-Mainstreamism Sources are Valid Legit which i called Wahhabi Mainstreamist they tries eradicating the references under the pretext of "Scholarly beliefs" , she tagging a words in a sentence which is covered by a reference but actually a single column in one citations he/she just vandalizing the article using a tags and every refence which is tagged are legal sources, he/she tries to delete the references which is not on their views some of users here are planning to reduce the article fiasco from early 2010s which contains nothing.(05:49, 25 April 2017 (UTC))

• PS but i cleaned up the vandals and added the other references supporting the previous sources which she/he branded as Un -scholar(Theseeker2016 (talk) 05:53, 25 April 2017 (UTC))

I appreciate your support and dedication for monitoring the article mentioned above. Please help us to improve that page! Hard work is really worth! Thank you. Mark_Jhomel 10:30, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

I will. Thanks, Mark. - Darwgon0801 (talk) 12:11, 20 June 2017 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svg You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on :Philippines. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Rivertorch^FIRE_WATER 15:12, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

Thanks Mister Alternativity. Appreciated. - Darwgon0801 (talk) 09:19, 20 July 2017 (UTC)

Heya. Would it be okay to ask you to move your vote from the "Further Discussion" to the "Survey" section? :D Just so the discussion and voting can be neater? :D Also, do you know the procedure for the article to be moved to a name other than the one proposed? - Alternativity (talk) 11:31, 22 August 2017 (UTC)

I actually moved it before I saw you asked. Thanks for asking anyway. For the procedure one Mr. Alternativity, I don't know. I thought you knew. - Darwgon0801

Hi! Darwgon, You and i Have been summoned to SPI, because we for the reason just contributing good facts in Pre-colonial Philippine sections, and i been in there in SPI because i revert the edits of Gunkarta and N0n3tup, you guess what i smell that these two are having a conflict of interests on their edits , they excluded Philippines and i revert that because it contains academic works and based on scholarly books. but they remove it just because they suspected that was work of a blocked User it is irrelevant reasoning. As i read WP:Deletion policy and WP:Source there are no mentioned that the works of a blocked editor despite of reliability must be remove! and as i observed i hope you do , they misused SPI as their tool for blocking the editors opposed to their conflict of interest, as i think they using SPI as their "sword and sheild" , why this user with conflict of interest are allowed by admins to block anyone who improving philippine articles? i but i no mater what happends , im not afraid to confront them ! (Searcher0 (talk) 01:44, 28 August 2017 (UTC))

Heya. Friendly note. :D I notice you've received at least one attack on your talk page. Next time that happens (hopefully it doesn't), you may want to report it as quickly as possible at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (the shortcut to which is WP:ANI. Such attacks should have no place in wikipedia, dagnabbit. Also, I notice your name is displayed on user page... that's perfectly acceptable of course, but as a concerned fellow-editor, I just wanted to warn you that it leaves you open to the potential of real-life harassment. (I unfortunately have my own experiences of this.) Hope you don't mind me saying these things. :D - Alternativity (talk) 04:35, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

No problem. Thanks. Darwgon0801 (talk) 05:50, 15 September 2017 (UTC)

Hi User:Darwgon0801. Now that the RM has been settled and we've been (rightly so!) encouraged to focus our efforts on improving the affected page(/s), I've recently been trying to update the various templates. For one thing, I'm not sure what to do with Template_talk:History of the Philippines. Since you seem to have more experience than me in editing templates, perhaps you have some thoughts? :D Thanks! - Alternativity (talk) 09:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Darwgon0801. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Content you added to the above article appears to have been copied from [http://www.globalpinoy.com/gp.topics.v1/viewtopic.php?postid=4fc5df380f4c7&channelName=4fc5df380f4c7 here]. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. All content you add to Wikipedia must be written in your own words. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 19:03, 17 March 2018 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tourism in the Philippines, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Negros ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Tourism_in_the_Philippines check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Tourism_in_the_Philippines?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:05, 23 March 2018 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Filipino cuisine, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Balut ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Filipino_cuisine check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Filipino_cuisine?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:43, 5 June 2018 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Darwgon0801. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Darwgon0801. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Hello!Kamusta? Lol, we met each other at youtube. It's nice to meet a fellow Wikipedian there.

Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 09:56, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Yes, sir Rene. I'm aware of that. - Darwgon0801 (talk) 10:43, 22 January 2019 (UTC)

Hey, would you like to add me in FB? Let's talk there. My name is the same all across the internet. I'd like to introduce you to the "Kasaysayan Hunters". They have new discoveries about precolonial Philippines and they have International Symposium this May 11-12.

https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCeZvO_PIyGoqPl_EHiUEhaA/videos

When you do a friend request. Message me first so that I would know it's you Darwgon0801! God Bless You! :D

Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 13:23, 3 May 2019 (UTC)

::Bro, I reverted your edit in the Chavacano article, but this time, I supplied references for the information.--Rene Bascos Sarabia Jr. (talk) 06:46, 6 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Vegetable soups in Philippine cuisine. Since you had some involvement with the Vegetable soups in Philippine cuisine redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. -- Tavix ^(talk) 18:53, 29 April 2019 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited 2019 Southeast Asian Games opening ceremony, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Harana ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/2019_Southeast_Asian_Games_opening_ceremony check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/2019_Southeast_Asian_Games_opening_ceremony?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:01, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

I feel as if the said person deleted too much of the history section of the Philippines especially the Islamic era, even though I agree with him that the article is excessively detailed, I also feel that the said deleted portions were crucial and necessary, can you chime in on this? Thanks!

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Philippines#PH_0447's_deletions_of_many_Islamic_era_history_paragraphs

My take on this is that they should be replace on the main History of the Philippines article (or in the 900-1565 one) at least if it's not there yet. Thanks. - Darwgon0801 (talk) 10:47, 7 May 2020 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mangyan, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Mouth harp ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Mangyan check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Mangyan?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:18, 15 June 2020 (UTC)

Hi Darwgon0801, I noticed that you are repeatedly reverting changes to Light Skin without adding an edit summary. For some reason you have a problem with Korean women being called "East Asian", and you also have a problem with "East Asian" being reverted to the original ordering in the introductory sentence.

I notice that you recently added "Central Asian" in front of "East Asian". Perhaps you very much want "Central Asian" to come first for some reason?

Please explain your reasoning here for why you are reverting edits on Light Skin. Also, please explain why you are reverting edits in the edit summary in the future. Biosaurt (talk) 04:48, 5 May 2024 (UTC)

Hello there

You recently edited this page and changed the eight most commonly spoken language at home (other than English) from Hindi to Tagalog. This is incorrect as the source shows. I have corrected this and added a link to the source.

Thank you Aemilius Adolphin (talk) 06:19, 29 May 2024 (UTC)

Hi. I recently tagged the Civil conflict in the Philippines article as needing update. I had not looked at the details there and still have not, but part of your subsequent edit [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Civil_conflict_in_the_Philippines&curid=33648429&diff=1283361759&oldid=1282677386 here] strikes me as confusion. In the infobox, you changed a wikilink piped to present as ongoing from List of ongoing conflicts to List of ongoing armed conflicts, but the bulleted list following that seems to contain items not mentioned in the newly targeted article. Perhaps some clarification is needed in the article body and/or in a footnote. Looking at the article wikitext, I do see that the infobox is {{tl|infobox military conflict}} and, considering the title of the article and the fact that {{tl|infobox civil conflict}} exists, that confuses me.

I have not looked more than superficially at the article and am remarkiing on your talk page in reaction to your edit. Perhaps these points should be raised on the article talk page. Wtmitchell (talk) (earlier Boracay Bill) 03:27, 1 April 2025 (UTC)

I have reverted your addition of an unsourced date of birth to Tanya Clarke. In addition to Wikipedia's basic principle of citing sources (Wikipedia:Citing sources), a special need for citations applies with regard to elements of a biography of a living person (WP:BLPPRIVACY). Feel free to add a date of birth when it is accompanied by a citation to a reliable, published, non-primary source. Eddie Blick (talk) 01:13, 25 May 2025 (UTC)