User talk:Denninithan
CS1 error on [[History of the Arabs]]
File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Qwerfjkl (bot). I have automatically detected that this edit performed by you, on the page :History of the Arabs, may have introduced referencing errors. They are as follows:
- A "bare URL and missing title" error. References show this error when they do not have a title. Please edit the article to add the appropriate title parameter to the reference. ([//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=History_of_the_Arabs&action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AQwerfjkl%20(bot)%7CQwerfjkl%20(bot)%5D%5D Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:Qwerfjkl%20(bot)/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F1185875133%7CHistory%20of%20the%20Arabs%5D%5D Ask for help])
Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:Qwerfjkl/Botpreload&editintro=User:Qwerfjkl/boteditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:Qwerfjkl&preloadtitle=Qwerfjkl%20(bot)%20–%20Denninithan§ion=new&preloadparams%5b%5d={{FULLPAGENAMEE:History of the Arabs}}&preloadparams%5b%5d=1185875133 report it to my operator].
Thanks, Qwerfjkl (bot) (talk) 14:57, 19 November 2023 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Walser migrations]] has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Walser_migrations help desk]. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 02:10, 25 November 2023 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Denninithan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
- Introduction and Getting started
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article
- Simplified Manual of Style
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help. Need some ideas about what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (
How to respond to having an article edit of yours reverted
Hi, Denninithan. Seeking consensus with other editors about article content is a key feature of Wikipedia's collaborative editing environment. When an edit you make is reverted by another editor, if you still believe your original edit was correct, you should go to the Talk page of the article to discuss the content disagreement with the other editor, and with any other editors interested in the topic. Simply reinserting your disputed content because you believe your reasoning was correct is contrary to consensus operation, and without the principle of consensus there would be chaos, with editors simply reverting each other endlessly and whipsawing the article back and forth, with no settlement of the underlying issue, and making no progress in developing the article. This type of back-and-forth reversion has a name at Wikipedia, and it's called Edit-warring, and is something to be avoided.
With respect to my removal of your edit at Judaeo-Romance languages, what you did next was to add the disputed content back into the article again, whereas what you should have done is to go to Talk:Judaeo-Romance languages and make your case there about why your approach is the correct one. I give you credit for going to my Talk page and raising the issue there, but 1) no one will see it there, and 2) you didn't wait for a response, you just reinserted the disputed content back into the article. This is how edit-warring gets started.
I won't remove your content again for now, to avoid spurring it even more into edit-warring territory. However that doesn't mean you can just ignore the situation, because a content disagreement still remains. I'll repeat here the offer I made to you on my Talk page to move your comment to Talk:Judaeo-Romance languages where any content disagreement can be discussed, and where other interested editors may find it and join in.
Going forward, if an editor reverts an article edit of yours, please follow dispute resolution guidelines and start a discussion on the article Talk page, instead of reverting back and insisting on your version. Thanks, Mathglot (talk) 23:31, 23 December 2023 (UTC)
: By mutual agreement at my user talk page, that discussion can now be followed here. Mathglot (talk) 00:14, 24 December 2023 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for January 19
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detectedthat when you recently edited Judeo-Shirazi, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Brill. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 18:00, 19 January 2024 (UTC)
March 2024
File:Information orange.svg Please do not introduce incorrect information into articles, as you did to :Constantine, Algeria. Your edits do not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. If you believe the information you added was correct, please cite references or sources or discuss the changes on the article's talk page before making them again. If you would like to experiment, use your sandbox. Thank you. M.Bitton (talk) 07:47, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
:The information I added in my addition was correct and properly cited you likely accidentally missed that and made a mistake. If you want proof you can check the revision history and look at my edit Denninithan (talk) 23:30, 21 March 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 29
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Northumbrian dialect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page English.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 05:54, 29 May 2024 (UTC)
I have sent you a note about a page you started
Hi Denninithan. Thank you for your work on Judeo-Mantuan. Another editor, North8000, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:
{{Bq|1=Nice work}}
To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|
North8000 (talk) 20:53, 2 June 2024 (UTC)
[[Draft:Morris Alexander]]
Hi, Denninthan. You have been pinged from the talk page of this article about verification issues which mean the article fails to comply with WP:V. As this is one of the site's key policies, the issues need to be resolved as soon as possible. The article is less than 90 days old and so I have moved it into draftspace per WP:ATD-I. You can work on the draft until it is ready to be moved back into mainspace, but I would recommend that you request a review prior to upgrade. Thanks. PearlyGigs (talk) 11:18, 22 July 2024 (UTC)
:In your reply at the article's talk page, you said: {{tq|Also in my opinion it is always faster to make a new article than correct and argue over an old one}}. I would advise you against trying to circumvent the process if that is your intention. You cannot just abandon a draft and write a new article about the same subject. PearlyGigs (talk) 10:14, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
::Not write a new article about the same subject but wrote about a different subject. Denninithan (talk) 11:20, 23 July 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for September 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Kyakhta Russian–Chinese Pidgin, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Labiovelar consonant.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 17 September 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 1
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Judeo-Roman dialect, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanesco.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:00, 1 October 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tây Bồi Pidgin French, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Annam.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:53, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for October 31
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Greek in Australia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palatalization.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:55, 31 October 2024 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 17
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Mura people, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Portuguese and Amazonas.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:51, 17 November 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:55, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on any page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template.
}} signed, Rosguill talk 16:40, 4 March 2025 (UTC)Disambiguation link notification for March 13
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Fort Ontario Emergency Refugee Shelter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Poland, New York.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 13 March 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 22
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Aimol people, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kom people.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:53, 22 March 2025 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 10
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Maio Creole, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Maio Island.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:57, 10 April 2025 (UTC)
Stub categories
File:Information.svg Greetings! It appears that you have been directly adding stub categories to articles. Stub categories should only be added by templates, as explained at Wikipedia:Stub. These templates automatically add any relevant stub categories. Adding the category directly creates problems if there is a need at some later date to change stub category names or to split stub categories. Using stub templates is also recommended as they add prompting messages to editors reading stub articles. Your work in sorting these stub articles is very useful, but it would be even more useful and greatly appreciated if you could use stub templates to do so! Thank you. (This message is a boilerplate, left here as a courtesy by Wikipedia:WikiProject Stub sorting, and should not be considered personal in nature.) Mox Eden (talk) 12:52, 20 April 2025 (UTC)
Extended confirmed edits
Please note that as per the noticed at the top of Talk:Kneecap (band) the article is under the contentious area of the Arab-Israeli conflict and you may not make edits to the page, nor discuss it, until you obtain Extended Confirmed status. As a result your edits have been reverted to the talk and article. You may only make a specific edit request in this area. See WP:ARBECR for more information. Canterbury Tail talk 16:46, 3 May 2025 (UTC)
May 2025
File:Ambox warning pn.svg Please stop adding unreferenced or poorly referenced biographical content, especially if controversial, to articles or any other Wikipedia page, as you did at :Kneecap (band). Content of this nature could be regarded as defamatory and is in violation of Wikipedia policy. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. BLP applies to small groups of people, and the article doesn't fully support the statement you added to the lead. (t · c) buidhe 00:13, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
:It is sourced idk what you're talking about (https://forward.com/fast-forward/716365/facing-police-investigation-irish-band-kneecap-denies-supporting-hamas-hezbollah/) also idk what "BLP" is. Denninithan (talk) 00:22, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
::You really shouldn't be editing in this topic area if you can't tell the difference between what it says in the body and the lead and if you aren't familiar with the WP:BLP policy. (t · c) buidhe 02:26, 4 May 2025 (UTC)
:::I just wasn't familiar with the acronym. Denninithan (talk) 04:03, 4 May 2025 (UTC)