User talk:Diiscool/Archive 1#Editor of the Week

Hi Diiscool: Thanks for backing me up at Laura Dekker, although I know that was not your intention. I have been having an edit war of sorts, with two anonymous ID's (most likely the same person). He went into 8 sailors' pages and moved an invisible comment found in

{{Persondata 
|NAME              =
|ALTERNATIVE NAMES =
|SHORT DESCRIPTION =
|DATE OF BIRTH     =
|PLACE OF BIRTH    =
|DATE OF DEATH     =
|PLACE OF DEATH    =
}}

from the outside to the inside, as indicated in the above example taken from the Wikipedia:Persondata page.

Here are the recent edits of User:75.47.132.78 and the earlier edits of User:75.47.137.104. The ones that you would be interested in are [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laura_Dekker&diff=prev&oldid=419711474 First change at Laura Dekker] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Laura_Dekker&action=historysubmit&diff=420635354&oldid=420251037 Second change at Laura Dekker] by the same individual. It appears that he has an obsession with following the example in the box above, like a robot, without realizing that the invisible comment is not only optional but also dispensable.

I would normally go easy on a newbie, but I thought he should be stopped from making ridiculously useless edits, and told him so on both his Talk Pages -- in a nice way :-)

--Skol fir (talk) 15:28, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

:Yes, I've been watching this for several days and I finally got annoyed by it. I wonder if the IP even knows what Persondata is, but that's irrelevant. I looked at the Abraham Lincoln and Aristotle articles (just convenient, alphabetical) to see what they've done with Persondata there and the invisible comment isn't included. I feel that anyone who needs to look up Persondata info probably can find it on their own. —Diiscool (talk) 15:51, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

:: I'll just go ahead and remove the note from those eight articles and see where it goes from there. —Diiscool (talk) 15:54, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

:::Thanks for doing that. I forgot to mention the other two, Zach and Abby Sunderland, but you saw those too. They were included in the first round by this editor, under the ID of 75.47.137.104 and later repeated under the ID of 75.47.137.101 . If you ask me, it looks like this person has the potential of becoming a vandal, the way he hops around from one ID to another. We need to keep a lookout, although so far the edits have been harmless. --Skol fir (talk) 16:08, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

::::I've dealt with the anonymous IP vandal issue on Abby Sunderland before (see here for those two IP addresses which were located in the same area of California as the two you are dealing with). I am 99% certain that all of these IPs are the same person. —Diiscool (talk) 16:36, 25 March 2011 (UTC)

:::I reverted all the latest edits by the IP # from Vallejo, CA. I also explained the reasons both in the edit summary and in the user's Talk Pages. It might stick; we'll see. --Skol fir (talk) 18:58, 26 March 2011 (UTC)

Hi Diiscool. I came across a new editor who's interested in sailing and specifically (for now) the International Sailing Federation but he's running into problems because of the somewhat confusing structure of the content in this area. I've given him some general tips but guidance from someone working in this area would be a much better solution. You can check out User talk:Yachty4000 for details. Thanks a lot, Pichpich (talk) 11:00, 5 April 2011 (UTC)

Image:Copyright-problem.svg

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of :Spesutie Island, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://local.yahoo.com/info-12520217-spesutie-island-boat-club-aberdeen-proving-ground.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:34, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

Hi Diiscool, I am delighted to see that you plan an article on this island. When I worked on the HMS Highflyer article it bugged me that I could find so little on the island, let alone a link to an article. Regards, Acad Ronin (talk) 13:50, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

:No problem. I was very surprised to not find an article on it. I'm almost finished with it now. So stay tuned! —Diiscool (talk) 13:52, 9 May 2011 (UTC)

::Nice. Now I finally know where it is. Regards, Acad Ronin (talk) 01:07, 10 May 2011 (UTC)

Just for your information, if you would have read the reference before making a snarky comment in the [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Abby_Sunderland&action=historysubmit&diff=428917245&oldid=428879698 edit summary], you would have seen that the "speculation" was not from me, but was in the article. So don't make it look like I was speculating! You should have directed the insult to the author of the reference, Diane M. Rey, who even writes in the article that Abby Sunderland herself did the speculating: "She expects to get her pilot's license before she gets her driver's license." This was the last sentence in the article.

Next time read the article before you make a foolish assessment of who did what. I did not speculate, I simply reworded what was in the article so no one could accuse me of "copy/paste." If Abby herself says something, I guess we are not to believe it? Hmmm... --Skol fir (talk) 19:40, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

:I did read the article before removing that bit and I had no intention of making it sound like you were the one speculating. In fact, that would be clear to anyone who looked at the source. I think you are overreacting. Also, you can use your own judgment about what to include and what not to include from a source. As someone with whom I have worked on the Abby Sunderland article for awhile now, I'm surprised at this hostility. —Diiscool (talk) 19:45, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

::You could not have read the article, since Abby said she expected to finish the pilot's licence first. That means it is a priority for her. That was not speculation at all, but the author recounting what was said to her in the interview. Get your terms right next time. Of course, I assumed you were directing the edit summary at me. I was the one who put in the statement about her probably finishing her pilot's licence first. Who else would you be directing it to? Get real. --Skol fir (talk) 19:50, 13 May 2011 (UTC)

I'm still having trouble getting the references correctly. I see that we were both there at the same time. I'll stay out of the way so that you can fix. :-) Buster Seven Talk 18:12, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

:Sorry about the edit conflict. I just went in to disambiguate "Toledo" and got caught in the middle of your edit. The references look fine to me now. Perhaps if you refresh your browser page, it will show up for you too. I wish I had more time to work on this particular article! —Diiscool (talk) 18:25, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

::Thanks for your efforts. We both strive to keep this article neutral and "clean". I see that my mistake was placing brkts (}}) behind "cite news". Still slowly learning after three years, with the help of editors like you.Buster Seven Talk 18:34, 5 June 2011 (UTC)

Right after his last block Ronald decided to go back and insert the same edit again. I've reported him here Wikipedia:AN/EW#User:Ronald_Wenonah_reported_by_User:Tirronan_.28Result:_.29 and he has decided that it is a personal vendetta by me against him that is the problem. Would you mind heading over and saying what you have to say on the subject?Tirronan (talk) 19:23, 11 June 2011 (UTC)

Image:Copyright-problem.svg

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of :Kastles Stadium at The Wharf, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://www.ticketmaster.com/Kastles-Stadium-at-The-Wharf-tickets-Washington/venue/172481.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 14:10, 8 July 2011 (UTC)

Diiscool, I too wondered why the hyphen has never been included in the title. There may once have been a problem with the hyphen character in titles (Wikipedia:CamelCase and Wikipedia?) but [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Naming_conventions_(ships)&diff=prev&oldid=1043093 this edit] introduced the notion that the correct form was hyphenated while retaining the lack of hyphen for the title. Shem (talk) 22:10, 25 July 2011 (UTC)

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Kastles Stadium at The Wharf until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Wikiglobaleditor (talk) 07:25, 2 August 2011 (UTC)

Hello, links to other wikis don't appear anymore... --Madelgarius (talk) 08:18, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

:Hi there. The links to other language wikis appear on the far left hand side of the page, at the bottom of the sidebar. This is standard procedure. You can read more about it here: WP:Interlanguage links. —Diiscool (talk) 13:53, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

:: I've seen, thanks a lot {{smiley}}, --Madelgarius (talk) 17:14, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

I removed that link from American Silver Eagle since it was impossible to tell whether it was a copyright violation. --Orange Mike | Talk 15:07, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

:The link was to the official U.S. Mint YouTube page so I assumed the video is public domain, as a work published by the U.S. Mint. There is no notice of copyright on the video, but I see how it could be a problem so I won't add it back. I wish they would put an explicit statement somewhere. —Diiscool (talk) 15:11, 3 August 2011 (UTC)

I'm trying to get editors to discuss changes on the talk page before making them as part of the initial steps needed before going to dispute resolution. Joshua refuses to discuss anything and just insists on edit warring, so perhaps we can set a better example. -- Scjessey (talk) 19:44, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

:I just left a message on his talk page too. At this rate, he won't last long unfortunately. —Diiscool (talk) 19:45, 12 September 2011 (UTC)

When you say "the existing text is synth" also, do you mean just the sentence I edited?

"In anticipation of criticism that the legislation was motivated by the upcoming election, the President noted that the election is fourteen months away and that Americans do not have the luxury of waiting fourteen months for jobs to be created.

I agree, but I don't know what to do with it. I'm working patiently on talk page on another issue right now, but how exactly does someone "make a statement, under the anticipation of criticism that the legislation was motivated by the upcoming election" anyway? Here is [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=American_Jobs_Act&oldid=453194552 the version] back when it was in the lead-in! I moved it down [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=American_Jobs_Act&diff=prev&oldid=453195030 on Sept 30th here] and was just as confused about what to do. The whole section is being discussed on the talk page, so if you want to drop by, we'd appreciate your input. Thanks, 완젬스 (talk) 21:29, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

:Yes, that is correct. The whole sentence is synth because whoever wrote it to begin with must have inferred the statement. Nowhere in that reference does it say that the speech was in anticipation of criticism, at least not that I could find. It's a terrible reference anyway since the video is no longer available. I'm trying not to get too involved with this article. —Diiscool (talk) 21:33, 11 October 2011 (UTC)

Back 'atcha..Buster Seven Talk 23:05, 31 December 2011 (UTC)

Image:Adoracao dos magos de Vicente Gil.jpg{{quotation|Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.}}

;;;;;;;;;;;;Happy Holidays..--Buster Seven Talk 25 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi, re your creation of this as an article on a different ship to that which I originally created it on, please see WT:SHIPS, where I have proposed a general reshuffle of titles for the two ships. Will give it a day or so before making any moves unless clear consensus is apparent that the moves either should or should not be made. Mjroots (talk) 10:07, 11 February 2012 (UTC)

:There was no confusion. I originally started the article on the cruise ship when she was reported to be sinking, but discovered that I'd been beaten to it. The other article was better developed so I merely turned my article into a redirect. Your creation of an article on a different ship was entirely proper. It was only because I'd left the redirect under the eyes of my patent article watch system that I noticed you'd created the new article. Anyways, all sorted out now. Moves done, wikilinks altered as appropriate so that they point to the correct article. Mjroots (talk) 10:39, 12 February 2012 (UTC)

File:Wikipedia Rollback.svg

Hello, following a review of your contributions, I have enabled rollback on your account. Please take note of the following:

• Rollback gives you access to certain scripts, including Huggle and Igloo, some of which can be very powerful, so exercise caution
• Rollback is only for blatant vandalism
• Having Rollback rights does not give you any special status or authority
• Misuse of Rollback can lead to its removal by any administrator
• Please read Help:Reverting and Wikipedia:Rollback feature to get to know the workings of the feature
• You can test Rollback at Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback
• You can display the {{tlx|User wikipedia/rollback}} userbox or the {{tlx|Rollback}} top icon on your user page

:If you have any questions, feel free to ask me. Reaper Eternal (talk) 19:23, 12 March 2012 (UTC)

{{tmbox

|style = notice

|small =

|image = Image:Updated DYK query.svg

|text = On 18 April 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Ryou-Un Maru, which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that the Japanese squid fishing vessel Ryou-Un Maru (pictured) was sunk by gunfire from a United States Coast Guard cutter? {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at .|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Ryou-Un Maru|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Ryou-Un Maru.|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Ryou-Un Maru|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Ryou-Un Maru.}} }} }}You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, [http://stats.grok.se/en/201204/Ryou-Un_Maru quick check]) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

}} Casliber (talk · contribs) 17:04, 18 April 2012 (UTC)

Thanks for the display of how the refs should look. I will follow your lead. ```Buster Seven Talk 03:00, 7 June 2012 (UTC)

I would appreciate your input at the talk page regarding a recent edit for August 2012. ```Buster Seven Talk 06:34, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

:File:Cordialgreetings1x pix.gif ```Buster Seven Talk 15:28, 5 August 2012 (UTC)

Hi. This is to let you know that I have proposed multiple page moves at Talk:Disability judo classification#Requested move 3 and have also proposed a move at Talk:Disability racquetball classification#Requested move 3. I am sending the same message to everyone who commented on the previous round of move requests for these articles. Regards, --Stfg (talk) 12:40, 29 October 2012 (UTC)

Image:Winter storm at Bryce Canyon.jpg{{quotation|Peace is a state of balance and understanding in yourself and between others, where respect is gained by the acceptance of differences, tolerance persists, conflicts are resolved through dialog, peoples rights are respected and their voices are heard, and everyone is at their highest point of serenity without social tension.}}

::Happy Holidays. ```Buster Seven Talk 15:09, 12 December 2012 (UTC)

I look forward to our continued collaboration. Take care. ```Buster Seven Talk 15:17, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

User:Buster7 submitted the following nomination for Editor of the Week:

{{userlinks|Diiscool}}. One look at his user page shows an editor hard at work creating the quality encyclopedia that our readers expect. Almost 4500 edits with 78% in article space. He showed up at Timeline of the Presidency of Barack Obama (2009) in early 2010 (we have worked in tandem since then) and has been a very active participant in monitoring and editing all 4 subsequent Timeline articles. With his guidance and demeanor, the Timeline articles have remained stress and trouble free...not an easy task for any editor working/involved in political articles.He does not involve himself in Drama. ```Buster Seven Talk

You can copy the following text to your user page to display a user box proclaiming your selection as Editor of the Week:

{{subst:Wikipedia:WikiProject Editor Retention/Editor of the Week/Recipient user box}}

Thanks again for your efforts! --Go Phightins! 01:55, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

:Congrats and thanks for all you do. Riding herd on an article like Timeline of the presidency of Barack Obama (2012) would make me go postal. We need guys like you and I am sure glad you are here!Gtwfan52 (talk) 04:51, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

{{Infobox person

|name= PROJECT EDITOR RETENTION
Editor of 20px the Week

|image=Pride_of_Baltimore_II_bell.jpg

|caption=

Diiscool
[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:WikiProject_Editor_Retention/Editor_of_the_Week#Recipients_of_Editor_of_the_Week Editor Retention Editor of the Week]
For the week beginning February 3, 2013

Diiscool has been editing Timeline of the Presidency of Barack Obama (2009) since 2010 and has been active in monitoring and editing all 4 subsequent Timeline articles. With his guidance and demeanor, the Timeline articles have remained stress and trouble free...not an easy task for any editor working/involved in political articles.

Next nominations
_{[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:WikiProject_Editor_Retention/Editor_of_the_Week/Project_main_page&action=edit Edit this section]}

|known_for= Timeline articles for Barack Obama

|notable_works= Timeline of the Presidency of Barack Obama (2009)

}}

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of shipwrecks in 2013, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page River Dee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:32, 10 February 2013 (UTC)

As I am a fellow fan and participant in the sport (not for way too long, it saddens me to say. Life intercedes, unfortunately.) I am super stoked to see as much as I can of the AC and its lead-ups, as the huge catamarans bring back memories. I started out in Hobies, but went to soloing in "A"s and crewing on "C"s. Any help you could give me regarding possible TV coverage would be very helpful! Gtwfan52 (talk) 23:26, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

:I don't usually follow the big races, but you might check out [http://www.youtube.com/user/AmericasCup http://www.youtube.com/user/AmericasCup]. —Diiscool (talk) 01:03, 16 February 2013 (UTC)

How do I create the "correct" dash (after the date)??? ```Buster Seven Talk 22:50, 25 February 2013 (UTC)

:Hi Buster. Sorry I haven't been helping much lately. I'm very busy right now and probably will be at least through March. Anyway, you can create the en dash (as it's called) by typing the HTML coding (without the quotes) where you want it to appear: "–" or you can click on the special character at the bottom of the editing box under the "Insert" dropdown menu. It's the first symbol shown. Or copy and paste one from elsewhere. Hope you are well. —Diiscool (talk) 00:40, 26 February 2013 (UTC)

I am messing around with this and would appreciate your thoughts. It is a small merchant fleet but hard to find information on. Any idea how to find sources?

North Korean merchant ships

Paul, in Saudi (talk) 15:25, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

:I'm sorry, I have no idea where to find information on these ships. —Diiscool (talk) 15:57, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

::Perhaps I am out-of-sorts after Ramadan, but I took offense at TtM's tone. It is probably me. Many thanks for your work. Nobody has said a supportive thing about my little project. Says something about human nature that nobody did, and that I hoped someone would. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 17:53, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

:::Paul, it is often difficult to read tone on Wikipedia. I'm sure the other editors appreciate your work on the list. It no doubt took some effort. I think it makes a great addition to Wikipedia and hopefully more full articles will be written about the NK ships. Thanks for your work. —Diiscool (talk) 17:57, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

::I am sure it just me, far from home for the Eid. However, I am dropping that page from my watchlist. I wanted mess about with a table, and not being s hip person (or a Korea person) have nothing else to contribute. Enjoy, and thank you. Paul, in Saudi (talk) 18:08, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Diiscool, THANKS SO MUCH for the Journal / pdf file !!! I had almost forgotten about the Chickering article/draft. Yes, when I first started the draft sources were almost non existent. This however, is a goldmine!!! I'm involved on other pages right now, but first chance I get I'll put that source to good use and put 'Chickering' on the WP map. If you're a stamp and/or postal history collector you might want to check out some of my philatelic creations, listed on my user page. Once again many many thanks!! -- Gwillhickers 21:33, 4 September 2013 (UTC)

...that you are a librarian! I'm semi-retired. My current little part-time job for the last two years is as an evening monitor in ......a library. That coincidence makes me smile! ```Buster Seven Talk 02:48, 5 September 2013 (UTC)

I will be catching up with the Timeline (2013) soon. ```Buster Seven Talk 15:29, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

:Thanks! I've really been busy lately and have been feeling guilty about neglecting it. Not to mention there is so much going on that could be added. It's a bit overwhelming. —Diiscool (talk) 15:33, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

::Same here. ```Buster Seven Talk 15:36, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

:::BTW, can you assist me to get an image of an American Kestral that I took a few years back entered at Commons and then to the article? No rush...it's waited this long. ```Buster Seven Talk 15:39, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

::::Uploading to Commons if fairly straightforward and wouldn't be bad for you to learn. I don't do it too often (i.e., infrequently enough that I usually have to look up instructions). Try using the Upload Wizard here: [https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard https://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/Special:UploadWizard]. —Diiscool (talk) 15:57, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

:::::TY. ```Buster Seven Talk 16:11, 10 September 2013 (UTC)

::::::100px. That was easy. Even for me. But, now, another problem has surfaced that I can't figure out. In updating the Timeline I have not been able to use the "Templates" or the dropdown menu. The box is visible and the menu appears when clicked but nothing happens. I have to do the "citing" step by step. Did I shut something off inadvertently? ```Buster Seven Talk 15:36, 21 September 2013 (UTC)

:::::::Buster, I don't know why you wouldn't be able to see/use the cite template menu. It seems to be working fine for me. You have to select "Show edit toolbar" in the "Editing" tab of your preferences. I generally add citations manually. —Diiscool (talk) 20:48, 22 September 2013 (UTC)

::::::::I have it selected but it still doesn't "work". No Prob, like you I just do it manually. ```Buster Seven Talk 12:52, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

Hi Diiscool,

Just wanted to inform you that the foundation of the Chickering page is in place and is now nominated for DYK. Once again thanks!!. -- Gwillhickers 05:56, 23 September 2013 (UTC)

In case you were not notified, I have initiated a conversation with Editor:KinkyLipids. Just to let you know. ```Buster Seven Talk 19:26, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

: Conversation went well. Collaboration is so wonderful and easy when it happens. ```Buster Seven Talk 22:18, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

:: Glad to hear that. —Diiscool (talk) 00:54, 1 October 2013 (UTC)

On 5K. I wonder if I might interest you in collaborating on a new article. It currently resides at User:Buster7/The McCormick Mansions of Chicago which is really just a collection of info that Ive gathered from here and there. Obviously the info needs to be turned into prose w/ photos and an infobox, etc. It was intended to be my first REAL article project as Ive created only a very few little articles over time but nothing substantial. I feel a need and urgency to involve myself in the real work of creating an encyclopedia rather the dramaboards. The Timelines are still a priority (for at least 3 more years). The Editor of the Week awards are also important. I'll still fight vandals when I see them, greet newbies when I can, give out the 100000K Awards and be a calming voice where I can. There is no rush to this request and, of course, no obligation. After almost 5 years maybe its time for me to get down to some real work. ```Buster Seven Talk 21:46, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

:Hi, Buster. Thanks for the kind words. I took a quick look at your McCormick mansions page. There's a lot of information there. My initial reaction is that it would be better to create individual pages for each mansion, however I don't know that they would meet WP:GNG (I hope they would). I didn't find any on the National Register of Historic Places but I could have overlooked one. Have you tried the Encyclopedia of Chicago which is available online? Might be something in there. Why don't you pick what you think is the most notable mansion and write an article for that then you can go from there. —Diiscool (talk) 21:56, 6 December 2013 (UTC)

::I'll get to work on that. Ill check that Enc of chgo out. Ive got a few books that I'll have to look for in the closets, etc. You have provided exactly what I need...someone to point me in the right direction. thanks. ```Buster Seven Talk 22:02, 6 December 2013

50px Merry Christmas and Happy New Year to you and yours. ```Buster Seven Talk 14:50, 26 December 2013 (UTC)

The News story I heard mentioned that it was the most ever awarded at a single time. Should that be mentioned? ```Buster Seven Talk 20:14, 18 March 2014 (UTC)

You have been selected to receive a merchandise giveaway. Please send us a message if you would like to claim your shirt. Thank you again for all you do! --JMatthews (WMF) (talk) 06:53, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

Hi Diiscool;

Thanks for adding the Authority Control template at G. Thomas Tanselle. I tried to add it myself when I created the page, but I couldn't figure out how to fill in the data and couldn't see the info on how to do it on the template page -- is there a way to get it to fill itself in? Cheers, ch (talk) 15:26, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

:No problem {{ping|CWH}}. I think the template will autofill if the authority control data is included on the article's Wikidata page ([http://www.wikidata.org/wiki/Q6204086 for Tanselle]). It's not on Tanselle's Wikidata page so it won't autofill. I rarely edit Wikidata so I'm not too familiar with that process; instead I manually add the authority numbers which I verify in each authority source. —Diiscool (talk) 15:39, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

::Thanks for the quick and clear explanation! I didn't know about the Wikidata link and will look for it in the future.ch (talk) 15:43, 19 September 2014 (UTC)

== Seasons Greetings ==

Delivered on behalf of The Wikipedia Library by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 06:18, 11 June 2015 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

:::This card was designed by User:Samtar

:Thanks, Buster! Merry Christmas and happy new year to you, too! —Diiscool (talk) 22:02, 19 December 2015 (UTC)

{{Template:50k Invite}}--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:37, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Diiscool. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Diiscool. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}