User talk:DoubleGrazing#Draft link for QashqAI Voice

Hello @[[User:DoubleGrazing|DoubleGrazing], Thank you for your comments on my submitted Draft: Ar. Jayesh Hariyani. I have worked on the changes you suggested. Kindly, review them and let me know if there is anything else I need to work on.

Appreciate your time. Melalekhan24 (talk) 17:27, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

This article is informative. Asrafdiu123 (talk) 11:49, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Asrafdiu123: you have now twice resubmitted Draft:Nasima Kadir Molla High School and Homes without any attempt at addressing the decline reasons. This is not only completely pointless, but it is also discourteous and annoying. You only have a finite number of attempts to get your draft published, I suggest you don't waste them with frivolous resubmissions. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:46, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

I reedit this article. It is a notable school located in Bangladesh. It is a top school not only Bangladesh but also south asia. There is many articla like this. So for helping people to know about details about this school it is mendatory to publish this school. Asrafdiu123 (talk) 12:49, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Need your help/advice on the rejection based on Wikipedia sources that you have mentioned. What other type of sources are needed? This is an ancient temple in a village of a large town of more than 700 years. Hunsur (talk) 08:13, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

:Everything you say in the draft needs to be supported by reliable published sources, so that the information can be verified. In fact, everything needs to be based on reliable published sources, and your job as the editor is merely to summarise what such sources have previously said.

:The sources must also show that the subject is notable enough to be included in a global encyclopaedia in the first place. If this building is included in an official heritage register or similar listing, then per WP:GEOFEAT that could make it notable; we would still need to see evidence of that status. Otherwise it needs to satisfy the general notability guideline WP:GNG, which requires significant coverage in multiple secondary sources that are reliable and entirely independent of the subject. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:20, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

:Ping @Hunsur -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:20, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

please help me to what kind of errors here in my article ?

link: Draft:KP Khalid Alax Varghese (talk) 11:02, 1 June 2025 (UTC)

:what i do 117.231.196.21 (talk) 09:50, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

::What is this regarding? Are you also asking about the Draft:KP Khalid draft?

::The decline reasons are shown in the decline notice on top of the draft, those are the issues that you need to address. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:10, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi I am Paul and you recently reviewed my article which was declined for copyright reasons.

The duplicate copy was from my personal blog which was written by myself but has now been removed.

Could you please allow me to resubmit the wikipedia article?

All the Best

Paul ZP10MIC (talk) 11:00, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

:Hi @ZP10MIC,

:I'm not a copyright expert, so don't take this as gospel, but all the same here's how I understand the situation:

:Speedy deletion was requested on your sandbox draft, and at the time I attended to the request, I checked and saw that the content was the same as on the gardenscapes84.com website, which claims copyright. I had therefore no option but to execute the requested speedy deletion.

:If that website no longer hosts the said content, then this wouldn't possibly now get picked up as a copyright violation. However, it still is one, because once the copyright claim is made, it persists even after the content is removed from a public website. Therefore, I couldn't knowingly let you post the same material here again.

:I also only have your word that you are the copyright owner of this material. I'm not doubting that, but I also cannot verify the claim, and therefore wouldn't be able to accept your request on that basis alone.

:You may be able to 'donate' the copyright material to Wikipedia, which is probably your best, and possibly only, way forward. For info on this, see donating copyrighted materials.

:HTH, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 12:12, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

::@ZP10MIC {{tpw}} I think I was the reviewer who noted the copyvio. I commend the suggestion of donating the text, but with a serious caveat. Writing for a blog and wi=ring for Wikipedia are different things, thus your blog text, were it to be reinstated and donated, may be totally unsuitable for Wikipedia. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 20:16, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

A disappointed creating editor objects to my decline, and has said {{rq|your role as reviewer is to review the articles thoroughly. that is why you should not lie about them specifically to the person who write the article}} on my talk page.

I do not believe it was a poor decline, but, if it was then I will take it on the chin. I do mind about the incivility, however, and wonder if you might indicate that this behaviour is not appropriate. 🇵🇸‍🇺🇦 Fiddle^Timtrent Faddle^Talk to me 🇺🇦‍🇵🇸 20:06, 4 June 2025 (UTC)

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Addicted4517

I'm not trying to get you to look at this case. but I want to know if I done this properly or if I made a mistake in reporting process.

• Specifically if contributions are small like 2 or 3, can I just post the contributions instead of the diffs?
• At a glance is there anything I need to do or is the report inherently bad or inappropriate?
• Also if you have recommendations?

all of course just from your quick glance or however long you want to look on it.

generally I don't want to do anything wrong and I don't want to get into trouble. I mean good. JamesEMonroe (talk) 10:05, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

:Hi @JamesEMonroe: you're not doing anything wrong and you're not going to get into trouble, if you're genuinely trying to help, so don't worry.

:The first thing that strikes me is that you're asking for CU to connect these three IPs to a registered account, which they won't do. Secondly, the last of the IPs, the one ending :2A, hasn't edited since 2020, so that one is stale anyway.

:I think it's better to provide diffs rather than quote the edits, because diffs cannot be altered after the edit was made, therefore they always show exactly the edit that was made, as well as showing the context, time stamp, etc.

:Finally, as general advice, the clearer and more succinct you can make the case, the more likely it is to be read by a patrolling CU/admin/clerk. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:25, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

::Ok, thank you!

::So generally they cant check if a registers user ip/info matches with an ip user (ip)? (or behavioral/other check user info?) or do they not need to?

::

:: Should I remove the check user request also, and is it possible for me to? JamesEMonroe (talk) 10:48, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

:::CUs can check a registered user account's underlying IP, that's kind of the point of CU. However, they are not allowed to publicly disclose that information, which means that they will not even respond to a CU request asking for that connection to be established, because to confirm a connection would be implicitly revealing the IP of the registered account. That's why, when a request like this (with only IPs) is made, it is declined on sight, and if one is made with a mix of registered accounts and IPs, they may process the accounts part only but routinely return a 'no comment' with regard to the IPs. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:57, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

::::OHHH ok that makes sense with privacy. So for the future, how do I approach this? email it privately to a clerk when dealing with ip's and a registered user?

::::Also could the ips themselves, since they are already exposed ips, be connected to each other for sockpuppetry similarly? or would that still be a privacy issue? JamesEMonroe (talk) 11:08, 5 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello

I am a paid editor acting on behalf of Matthew Lani’s PR team, and I’ve disclosed my COI on my user page per Wikipedia’s paid editing policy.

The draft article :Draft:Matthew Lani was mistakenly moved to mainspace earlier, where it was indexed by Google and viewed by the public. It was later moved back to Draft.

Given that Matthew Lani is a notable South African public figure (verified by multiple independent, reliable sources), and because the article had already been made publicly accessible, I kindly request that this draft be reviewed at your earliest convenience.

I will not make further changes without review by a neutral editor. Thank you for your time and consideration Ashleyashville (talk) 00:14, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

:Hi @Ashleyashville: I don't do on-demand reviews, especially of newly-submitted drafts, when we have a large backlog of drafts, some of which have been waiting for weeks to be reviewed. You are, however, in luck, as there is currently a backlog drive running which will probably clear the backlog by the end of this month, and chances are that your draft will be reviewed as part of that before too long. Please be patient.

:It's interesting the way you expressed {{tq|"mistakenly moved to mainspace"}}. "Mistakenly", yes, in the sense that you shouldn't have done it, because of your paid-editing COI. But presumably not "mistakenly" in the sense of it being inadvertent, given that you did it again a few days later. Anyway, I trust you won't be doing that again? And on a related but different point, I hope you also realise that once published (assuming) in the mainspace, you are no longer allowed to edit the article directly, which I see you have been doing, but must instead make edit requests. Please confirm you're aware? Thank you, -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:55, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

::Hi. Thanks for your time to reply. Yes I am not aware that an COI isn’t allowed to make direct edits and must make suggestions on the talk page. And with the mistake. It was a mistake in the sense that, I should’ve actually taken the time to really read to understand the Wikipedia guidelines. But I am very much opened to being called out and fixing my mistakes. Ashleyashville (talk) 07:21, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

:::Correction. I am aware that COI edicts ain’t allowed to make direct edits and must instead make suggestions on the talk page and other edits will do the edit. Ashleyashville (talk) 09:23, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

News and updates for administrators from the past month (May 2025).

File:Green check.svg Guideline and policy news

• An RfC is open to determine whether the English Wikipedia community should adopt a position on AI development by the WMF and its affiliates.

File:Octicons-tools.svg Technical news

• A new feature called Multiblocks will be deployed on English Wikipedia on the week of June 2. See the relevant announcement on the administrators' noticeboard.
• History merges performed using the mergehistory special page are now logged at both the source and destination, rather than just the source as previously, after this RFC and the resolution of T118132.

File:Scale of justice 2.svg Arbitration

• An arbitration case named Indian military history has been opened. Evidence submissions for this case close on 8 June.

File:Info Simple bw.svg Miscellaneous

• Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 17 June 2025. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!
• An Articles for Creation backlog drive is happening in June 2025, with over 1,600 drafts awaiting review from the past two months. In addition to AfC participants, all administrators and new page patrollers can help review using the Yet Another AFC Helper Script, which can be enabled in the Gadgets settings. Sign up here to participate!
• The Unreferenced articles backlog drive is happening in June 2025 to reduce the backlog of articles tagged with {{tl|Unreferenced}}. You can help reduce the backlog by adding citations to these articles. Sign up to participate!

----

{{center|{{flatlist|

• Discuss this newsletter
• Subscribe
• Archive

}}}}

{{center|1=Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:16, 6 June 2025 (UTC)}}

Hey pal, sorry to bother again, just wanted to ask if anything happened with the draft?

this is the one I had made: https://es.wikipedia.org/wiki/Usuario:Axtorino/Borrador

can’t really tell if it was moved or if I messed up something 😅

anyway thanks again, you’re a GOAT 🙏 Axtorino (talk) 23:40, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

:@Axtorino: that is a page on the Spanish-language Wikipedia, which I have never edited (AFAIK) and have nothing to do with. But from the page history, it looks like the last edit was about a month ago, and nothing has been done to it since. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:16, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

::hey man, thx anyway! I might do an english version soon so maybe I’ll bug you again later 😅 appreciate what you do, enjoy the weekend! Axtorino (talk) 11:29, 7 June 2025 (UTC)

Hey @DoubleGrazing I just wanted to check on the reason for rejecting the submission, as we reworked the submission previously and it was the same reasons mentioned. If you could please help me in highlighting certain aspects of the draft that you think I should update, I would really appreciate it. Thank you so much Willywallow (talk) 07:36, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

:@Willywallow: the reasons why I declined Draft:Seez (company) are given in the decline notice and the additional comment I left, please study those (including all the links contained therein, as they point to relevant guidelines and policies).

:Could you please also respond to the conflict-of-interest query I posted on your talk page. Thank you. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:44, 11 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello. You're invited to participate in The World Destubathon. We're aiming to destub a lot of articles and also improve longer stale articles. It will be held from Monday June 16 - Sunday July 13. There is $3338 going into it, with $500 the top prize. If you are interested in winning something to save you money in buying books for future content, or just see it as a good editathon opportunity to see a lot of articles improved for articles which interest you, sign up on the page in the participants section if interested.♦ Dr. Blofeld 13:56, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

{{Message box|backgroundcolor=red|heading={{white|I am sorry for the mayhem I caused.}}|message={{white|If you and the other community can please trust me, I'd be very welcome!}}}}

209.239.193.21 (talk) 18:14, 14 June 2025 (UTC)

can i added second infobox in Helios Airways? Thebaldball (talk) 10:32, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:@Thebaldball: I don't know if it's a good idea to have two infoboxes, but you may be able to add an extra module to the existing one, although whether the {{tl|infobox airline}} template supports that, I'm not sure. I suppose you can always try to add a second box, and if someone objects to it, you can then discuss on the article talk page in the usual WP:BRD way. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 10:50, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi @DoubleGrazing, I noticed that the draft "Draft:Susil dungarwal" was deleted. I’m the original creator and would like to continue working on it by adding reliable, independent sources and rewriting it in a neutral tone. Could you please consider temporarily restoring it so I can improve it? Thanks! Jatinder190124 (talk) 15:40, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:Hi @Jatinder190124: I didn't actually delete it myself, I only requested its deletion. Having just looked at it again, I stand by my assessment and don't really see why it should be restored. The draft is unreferenced, promotional, and basically just a CV/resume. That said, you're free to ask the deleting admin if they will restore it for you.

:Now that you're here, I would like to ask if both of the two accounts involved in creating this draft, Jatinder190124 as well as {{u|JatinderMahajan}}, are yours? -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 15:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

::yes they are both mine I used to contribute to wikimedia since last two years Jatinder190124 (talk) 16:03, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:::@Jatinder190124: okay, thank you for confirming. You need to make that obvious, per WP:ALTACCN, lest you are accused of abusing multiple accounts. (Also, be careful to not actually abuse multiple accounts, of course.)

:::I also note that one of the accounts has disclosed COI on its userpage, but the other hasn't. You need to disclose for all accounts you're using where the COI applies. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 16:09, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

when you publish my article Dineshkumaresan123 (talk) 19:13, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:Assuming that this is about Draft:Tentkotta - the reasons for declining the article are given on the page. But in short, there needs to be enough independent sources to show that the subject it notable enough for a Wikipedia article. Add some evidence of third party coverage (press releases do not count) before resubmitting. -- D'n'B-📞 -- 06:02, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi :{{re|DoubleGrazing}}, I noticed that the draft "Draft:Skiibii I would love to restore the draft, rewrite it and add Reliable sources.

Destinyokhiria (talk) 07:25, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

:@Destinyokhiria: are you sure you want to go there? That subject is associated with so much sockpuppetry, long-term-abuse, and other serious issues, that I would give it very wide berth, if I were you.

:In any case, the last deleted draft at Draft:Skiibii was pure promotion, and backed up (well, not really, but let's say it was) with very poor-quality sources. I don't think there is much point in restoring that. If – and I very much do mean if – you want to write about this subject, I'd suggest you're better off starting from scratch. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 07:37, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

::Ok Thanks, I didn't know about the Sock issues and the promotion issues, I will start from scratch, the artist is Notable but is poorly written Destinyokhiria (talk) 08:10, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Thanks so much for the helpful comments on the page on the nonprofit Amend. They helped me make it much better.

I believe that I have addressed all of your comments. The article now cites a number of in-depth references from reputable sources (such as the World Health Organization, the International Transport Forum, Radio France International and the Economist, among others) that are secondary and independent. We also cite the scientific publications from peer reviewed scientific journals. Jwitteaix (talk) 10:15, 18 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi @DoubleGrazing, I’m reaching out regarding the article (Draft:EXR (app)) that was previously rejected by you. While I wasn’t the original author of the rejected draft, I’ve since created a substantially revised version that is significantly different in content, citation, and tone.

Would you please be open to taking a look and letting me know if it now meets the guidelines? Thanks in advance! BMcheesus (talk) 12:58, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

:Hi {{re|BMcheesus}} yes, I can see that the draft is now much better sourced (or at least, has many more sources) than when I rejected it. I'm happy to revert my rejection and put this back into the pending pool for another chance. I might even review it again myself, but don't have time to do that now, so someone else may get there first. Best, --DoubleGrazing (talk) 13:05, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks for your super quick reply @DoubleGrazing! I'm glad to hear that. Have a nice day! BMcheesus (talk) 13:13, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

Dear DoubleGrazing,

Thank you for your response and for reviewing my submission.

The draft for the article "QashqAI Voice" is available at the following link:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:S.Aslani2025/Sandbox

I would be grateful for any suggestions or support to improve it for publication.

Best regards,

S.Aslani2025 S.Aslani2025 (talk) 17:27, 24 June 2025 (UTC)

File:AFC unreviewed draft statistics.svg

Hi! Thanks for participating in the Articles for Creation June Backlog Drive! We've done amazing work so far, dropping the backlog by more than 2000 drafts already. We have around {{Rounddown|{{formatnum:{{PAGESINCATEGORY:Pending AfC submissions}}|R}}|-2}} drafts outstanding, and we need your help to get that down to zero in 5 days. We can do this, but we need all hands on deck to make this happen. A list of the pending drafts can be found at WP:AFCSORT, where you can select submissions in your area of interest. Thank you so much for your work so far, and happy reviewing! – DreamRimmer ■ 01:29, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

You marked Draft:Exit Music (For a Film), a draft I created as under review yesterday, but you haven't posted a result, is that intentional or did you forget about the draft? Newtatoryd222 (talk) 02:25, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

:Hi @Newtatoryd222: no, I didn't forget. There's a redirect currently at Exit Music (For a Film), which has twenty years of edit history behind it, and I'm trying to figure out what to do with that. FYI I'm planning to accept your draft, just need a bit more time. Bear with me. -- DoubleGrazing (talk) 06:39, 25 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{talk page watcher}} {{ping|Newtatoryd222}} As DoubleGrazing did not have time to find out what to do with the twenty years of history, I have already moved the redirect's former history to {{no redirect|Exit Music (For a Film) (song)}} and then accepted the draft. GTrang (talk) 05:23, 26 June 2025 (UTC)

::Oh, well done, @GTrang! Thanks for taking care of that, appreciate it! :) DoubleGrazing (talk) 05:55, 26 June 2025 (UTC)