User talk:Doughbo
Deletion discussion about [[Light Rangers: Mending the Maniac Madness]]
Hello, Doughbo, and welcome to Wikipedia. I edit here too, under the username TheLongTone, and I thank you for your contributions.
I wanted to let you know, however, that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Light Rangers: Mending the Maniac Madness, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Light Rangers: Mending the Maniac Madness.
You might like to note that such discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. And, our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with
. And, don't forget to sign your reply with
. Thanks!
(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)
TheLongTone (talk) 11:03, 3 May 2023 (UTC)
Ernest Rutherford GA review on hold
Hi Doughbo. I've started reviewing Ernest Rutherford, and have put it on hold for the moment. See Talk:Ernest Rutherford/GA1 for more details. Essentially I have paused the review before conducting the wider reading aspects of the review in order for the issues regarding sourcing, prose, and focus to be dealt with. Always happy to talk about the best way forward. SilkTork (talk) 11:30, 23 June 2023 (UTC)
:Hi again. I've closed the review as suggested. I will help out where I can on preparing for a future GAN. SilkTork (talk) 08:30, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
A belated welcome!
File:Chocolate chip cookies.jpg
Here's wishing you a belated welcome to Wikipedia, Doughbo! I see that you've already been around a while and wanted to thank you for your contributions. Though you seem to have been successful in finding your way around, you may still benefit from following some of the links below, which help editors get the most out of Wikipedia:
{{Div col|colwidth=18em}}
- Introductory tutorial
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- Writing an article
- Five pillars of Wikipedia
- Community portal
- Help pages
- The Teahouse (newcomer help)
- Main help desk
{{Div col end}}
Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Try the Task Center.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Again, welcome! SilkTork (talk) 08:33, 18 July 2023 (UTC)
August 2023 Good Article Nominations backlog drive
style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |Good article nominations | August 2023 Backlog Drive |rowspan=3|File:Multiple GA Barnstar.png |
August 2023 Backlog Drive:
|
colspan=2|Other ways to participate:
|
colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Requested GOCE copy edit of Ernest Rutherford
ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2023|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:48, 28 November 2023 (UTC)
March 2024 GAN backlog drive
style="border: 5px solid #ABCDEF ; background-color: #FFF; padding:10px 15px 0"
|style="padding: 0; vertical-align: middle; height: 1.1em; font-size:130%" |Good article nominations | March 2024 Backlog Drive |rowspan=3|File:Multiple GA Barnstar.png |
March 2024 Backlog Drive:
|
colspan=2 style="font-size:85%; padding-top:15px;"|You're receiving this message because you have reviewed or nominated a good article in the last year. |
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Action Tendency|Action Tendency]] (August 4)
{{divbox|gray|3=Neologisms are not considered suitable for Wikipedia unless they receive substantial use and press coverage; this requires strong evidence in independent, reliable, published sources. Links to sites specifically intended to promote the neologism itself do not establish its notability.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Could be notable, but it is not evident at the moment.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Action Tendency and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Action_Tendency Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:CFA&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Action_Tendency reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
style="margin: 0.4em 2em;" |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello, Doughbo!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! C F A 💬 19:33, 4 August 2024 (UTC) |
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC
Requesting some article expansion help
Greetings @Doughbo
Hi, I am User:Bookku, On Wikipedia I engage in, finding information and knowledge gap areas in Wikipedia and promoting expansion of related drafts and articles. Came across your membership of WP:WikiProject Religion/Interfaith work group#Members and also Draft:Action Tendency.
Requesting your visit to Tashabbuh (still a draft in my userspace) and help expand the topic areas if you find topic interesting. Wish you very happy Wikipedia editing.
Also on side of psychology topics side, I had now deleted Draft:Irrational beliefs can be recovered if any willing expansion volunteers can join in.
Thanks and warm regards Bookku (talk) 03:23, 24 September 2024 (UTC)
:Very interesting. I will add it to my watchlist, if nothing else. Doughbo (talk) 01:26, 25 September 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Action Tendency]] has been accepted
Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Action_Tendency help desk]. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.
Thanks again, and happy editing!
ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 09:35, 8 October 2024 (UTC)
ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message
Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:33, 19 November 2024 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Harvey Najim|Harvey Najim]] (April 2)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Promising draft, but please fix the non-encyclopaedic writing style. Kind regards, Spinster300 (talk) 19:42, 2 April 2025 (UTC).}}
:Could you provide some MOS inlinks or specify which passages are in need of improvement? I'm not sure exactly what you're referring to. Doughbo (talk) 21:36, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harvey Najim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Harvey_Najim Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Spinster300&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Harvey_Najim reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Spinster300 (talk) 19:42, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Harvey Najim|Harvey Najim]] (April 8)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Still reads like a promotional resume, and some of the sourcing is problematic. I just removed what looks like a bogus source, and there really is only one single really secondary source here.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Harvey Najim and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Harvey_Najim Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Drmies&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Harvey_Najim reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.