User talk:DoyleCB

Hi. Congratulations: your behaviour is sufficiently irritating that I've blocked you until you learn how to behave. First off, you would have a long block for yet another 3RR violation. Then I discover that you are making stupid edits such as [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoyleCB&diff=next&oldid=298177003], [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DoyleCB&diff=next&oldid=298177450].

So: its up to you really: are you prepared to give up the nonsense or not? William M. Connolley (talk) 21:05, 23 June 2009 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|1=This is ridiculous. I have not violated the 3 revert rule. I challenged my last block, and the one before that, and all the other punitive administrative functions, like this and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:William_M._Connolley&oldid=298240523 this] and [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Storm_Rider&oldid=298218488 this] done at the request of the LDS editors who refuse to entertain a perspective that is not overtly Mormon favored. I don't believe that any of my real actions constitute such a harsh consequence. This is really beyond ridiculous and conducive of censorship.|decline=This doesn't seem to address your actions and is very accusatory; since you were partially blocked for incivility, I don't see any reason why you should be unblocked. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 04:13, 25 June 2009 (UTC)}}

Comments: I don't see any evidence that DCB has understood what he has done wrong, or is at all interested in finding out. Given that, I see every reason for his unacceptable behaviour to continue. Unless DCB expresses at the very least an interest in discovering *why* his behaviour is considered unacceptable I can see nothing further to do here William M. Connolley (talk) 07:30, 24 June 2009 (UTC)