User talk:Dzmanto

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation

File:Information.svg Hi there! Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

{{The edit-summary field}}

I noticed your recent edit to :Cross-border injunction does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

• User contributions
• Recent changes
• Watchlists
• Revision differences
• IRC channels
• Related changes
• New pages list and
• Article editing history

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes.

Thanks! --Edcolins (talk) 17:47, 17 August 2015 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Dzmanto. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

An article you recently created, G 1/09, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources and not primary sources - which the article is currently sourced to in its entirety. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Alexandermcnabb (talk) 10:40, 15 October 2022 (UTC)

:I edited the draft and added a reference. You will also find lots of reliable references in the section "external links". There is, for example, a link to the decision G1/09 as published by the EPO. Dzmanto (talk) 20:18, 19 October 2022 (UTC)

An article you recently created, G 1/83, G 5/83 and G 6/83, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 14:34, 19 November 2022 (UTC)

:My draft cites several sources at the European patent office. Those sources are reliable. Since the Boards of Appeal at the EPO are judicially independent, my sources are also independent. In addition, my draft cites VISSER's annotated EPC. VISSER's annotated EPC is a textbook that is independent from the EPO. The textbook is also a secondary reference.

:My draft meets the criteria of reliable, secondary, and independent reference. I request acceptance. Dzmanto (talk) 20:05, 3 December 2022 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to :G 4/95, did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Use of external links in the main body of the article. scope_creep^Talk 15:06, 25 January 2024 (UTC)