User talk:Earl Andrew#Questionable use of administrator tools

Reminder to participate in Wikipedia research

Hello,

I recently invited you to take a survey about administration on Wikipedia. If you haven’t yet had a chance, there is still time to participate– we’d truly appreciate your feedback. The survey is anonymous and should take about 10-15 minutes to complete. You may read more about the study on its Meta page and view its privacy statement.

Take the survey [https://wikimediafoundation.limesurvey.net/294789?lang=en here].

Kind Regards,

WMF Research Team

BGerdemann (WMF) (talk) 00:17, 13 November 2024 (UTC)

ArbCom 2024 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2024 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on {{#time:l, j F Y|{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data|2024|end}}-1 day}}. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2024 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the Special:SecurePoll/vote/{{Arbitration Committee candidate/data. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{tlx|NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:04, 19 November 2024 (UTC)

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Hullolympiques.jpg

File:Copyright-problem.svg

Thank you for uploading :File:Hullolympiques.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you. — Ирука13 10:14, 21 November 2024 (UTC)

Nomination of [[:Chris Begg]] for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article :Chris Begg is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Chris Begg until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

SolxrgashiUnited (talk) 13:40, 5 December 2024 (UTC)

DSC source for 2023 Can Junior U21?

Hello Earl. Now I translate 2023 Canadian Junior Curling Championships to Rus-Wiki - and can't find source for DSC (not in article, not on Curling Canada website, of course not on CurlingZone). Maybe you remember from where DSC was taken? By the way MXMas & HNY & GoodGame! :) -- Alexey Gustow (talk) 20:20, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

:Took some sleuthing (Internet Archive, but then manually changing the URLs, and then a google search), but here are the [https://www.curling.ca/files/2023/04/Last-Stone-Draw-Sheet-U21-Women-2023.xlsm-Standings-Round-Robin-7.pdf women's] and the [https://www.curling.ca/files/2023/04/Last-Stone-Draw-Sheet-U21-Men-2023.xlsm-Standings-Round-Robin-5.pdf men's]. -- Earl Andrew - talk 21:19, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

::Great, thanks! (because I was wondered about no source) I added it to en-Wiki too. -- Alexey Gustow (talk) 22:31, 29 December 2024 (UTC)

Novice attempts at "The Shot"

Hey Earl! Working on addressing GAR comments for Jennifer Jones (curler) and the reviewer would like a source for "[The Shot] became the source of talk and attempts by novice curlers to repeat the feat in curling clubs across the country." While I entirely believe that this is true, I can't find a mention of it in the Wyman book, and none of the news articles on "The Shot" that I've found mention it either. Do you know where I might find a reference for this, or should I just take it out? Allthegoldmedals (talk) 01:11, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

:@Allthegoldmedals Maybe take it out? It doesn't sound like something I wrote, so I don't know where it came from. Probably just fancruft. -- Earl Andrew - talk 01:40, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

::Indeed, it was added by an IP address [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=27844486&oldid=26913793&title=Jennifer_Jones_(curler) in 2005]. -- Earl Andrew - talk 04:29, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

January 2025

File:Information.svg Hello. I have noticed that you {{usertalk other|[https://xtools.wmflabs.org/editsummary/en.wikipedia.org/{{urlencode:Earl Andrew|PATH}} often]|often}} edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! Legend of 14 (talk) 21:42, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

:Huh. First time in 20 years someone has complained about that. Old habits die hard.-- Earl Andrew - talk 21:56, 15 January 2025 (UTC)

::Unfortunately, there are two discussions at BLPN that Legend of 14 made. May want to respond accordingly. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 15:50, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

:::And at it again. 2601AC47 (talk·contribs·my rights) Isn't a IP anon 17:21, 17 January 2025 (UTC)

Please don't remove maintenance tags for no reason or readd unsourced content about living people, like you did on Darrel Kent and Allan Higdon. Thanks. Legend of 14 (talk) 15:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

:Hello, I am objecting to your removal of content, as I find it unconstructive. -- Earl Andrew - talk 15:15, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

::WP:BOLP requires contentious material about living persons be removed immediately. Do not readd material about living persons that has been removed without citations. Legend of 14 (talk) 15:17, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

:::You are removing information that is not contentious though. Accurate, even if not cited election results are not contentious. -- Earl Andrew - talk 15:19, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

::::I disagree. Attributing someone to working at a body which makes controversial decisions or content about immigration status is contentious in my opinion. If it is accurate, add a citation.

::::"Do not leave unsourced or poorly sourced material in an article if it might damage the reputation of living people or existing groups, and do not move it to the talk page."

::::-WP:Verifiability [formatting and links ommitted] Legend of 14 (talk) 15:24, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

BLPN

File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at WP:BLPN regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Legend of 14 (talk) 15:53, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

ANI

File:Information icon4.svg There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. Legend of 14 (talk) 16:27, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

Question

To be honest Earl, I'm also kind of confused how this unsourced content ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Darrel_Kent&diff=prev&oldid=1269810226] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Darrel_Kent&diff=prev&oldid=1269816467] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Allan_Higdon&diff=prev&oldid=1269810502] [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Darrel_Kent&diff=prev&oldid=1269810226]) is capable of just being added back to the article.

Per WP:BURDEN, {{tq|Any material lacking an inline citation to a reliable source that directly supports[b] the material may be removed and should not be restored without an inline citation to a reliable source}} (emphasis added). Per WP:BLPRS, {{tq|any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable, published source using an inline citation; material not meeting this standard may be removed... This applies whether the material is negative, positive, neutral, or just questionable and whether it is in a biography or in some other article}}. Maybe I'm missing something here. Could you help me understand? Tarlby (t) (c) 17:48, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

:Hi,

:While it's within their rights to remove uncited claims per WP:BURDEN, I believe that Legend of 14's approach to doing so was destructive, and perhaps in bad faith. They were removing content from a lot of articles very quickly, most of the content being non contentious. Based on their edit history, and willingness to escalate this dispute, I do have to say I'm a bit suspicious of this user's true intentions.-- Earl Andrew - talk 18:05, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks for answering. Although Legend's behavior could be in bad faith (idk, I didn't check thru their edits yet), are the edits themselves still appropriate? Can the unsourced content still be removed? Tarlby (t) (c) 18:07, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

:::Taken in isolation, then yes, they are. I don't mind working to add sources to a couple of articles at a time.-- Earl Andrew - talk 18:10, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

::::👌👌👌👌 Tarlby (t) (c) 18:11, 16 January 2025 (UTC)

[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Grand-Mère]]

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Grand-Mère has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unambiguous

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:31, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

2025 Scotties - Draw 17

Hey Earl,

I am following the Scotties via the stats on Curling Canada's site and not able to watch live at the moment as I am at work.

I am wondering what is going on with Team Prince Edward Island in Draw 17. For the first two ends, they began the game with their normal lineup. However, beginning in the third end, both lead Whitney Jenkins and skip Jane DiCarlo (throwing third stones) both left the game with alternate Jenny White entering and leaving the team with three players and haven't found any updates online since they aren't the feature matchup. Wondering if both Jenkins and DiCarlo got injured or something else happened?

Also, I haven't found a reason why Team Nunavut lead Alison Taylor is not playing in Draw 17 either, but I presume she fell ill and had to play with three players since they didn't bring an alternate with (I did add the note to the 2025 Scotties page).

Thanks!

TheCaseDogg (talk) 20:57, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

:@TheCaseDogg The TSN announcers mentioned PEI is down to 3 players and that Dicarlo left the building. Didn't mention a reason I don't think, but I haven't been watching the whole game. @ TracyFleuryFan might have some insights -- Earl Andrew - talk 21:18, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

::Just turned the game on so not sure TracyFleuryFan (talk) 21:30, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

:::@TracyFleuryFan @Earl Andrew I did add a basic note for PEI regarding the situation. If more insight comes or a specific reason, feel free to update. TheCaseDogg (talk) 21:39, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

[[Scott Mitchell (curler)]]

Created but I'm a little unsure of all the lineup changes between 2021 and 2023. I see you made the pages for Rooney and Jacob Jones so if you see anything on this one I missed please add, thanks :) TracyFleuryFan (talk) 05:38, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

:Hi, I doubt I can be of any help, as I'm not privy to any sources that you also wouldn't have access to.-- Earl Andrew - talk 15:29, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Hockeygermany.PNG

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Hockeygermany.PNG. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of non-free use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:16, 3 March 2025 (UTC)

Invitation to participate in research

Hello,

The Wikimedia Foundation is conducting a survey of a group of Wikipedians to better understand their experiences! We are also looking to interview some survey respondents in more detail, and you will be eligible to receive a thank-you gift for the completion of an interview. The outcomes of this research will shape future work designed to improve on-wiki experiences.

We have identified you as a good candidate for this research, and would greatly appreciate your participation in this [https://wikimedia.qualtrics.com/jfe/form/SV_bwKum9LHQGL5bWS survey], which shouldn’t take more than 2-3 minutes. You may view its privacy statement here. Please contact me if you have any questions or concerns. Kind regards, Sam Walton (talk) 16:35, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

c

Did you not see the source I posted? Or are you trying to ignore it?

https://ifosta.de/Sport/Curling/Maenner/12-InternationaleMeisterschaften/Europameisterschaften-Curling.html

https://ifosta.de/Sport/Curling/Frauen/12-InternationaleMeisterschaften/Europameisterschaften-CurlingFrauen.html

Tabelle

Although I didn't need a source for these at all because:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:No_original_research#Routine_calculations

[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Ottawa Titans (disambiguation)]]

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Ottawa Titans (disambiguation) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unneeded 2 item dab page

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This is an automated notification. Please refer to the page's history for further information. DatBot (talk) 00:32, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

RfC

[[:WP:MOSBIO]] has an [[WP:RFC|RfC]]

:WP:MOSBIO has an RfC for possible consensus. A discussion is taking place. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. MWFwiki (talk) 00:17, 14 May 2025 (UTC)