User talk:Ed!/11#Precious

{{tmbox

|style = notice

|small =

|image = Image:Updated DYK query.svg

|text = On 21 July 2012, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article William Thompson (Medal of Honor, 1950), which you created or substantially expanded. The fact was ... that in 1951 William Thompson (pictured) posthumously became the first African American to be awarded the Medal of Honor since the Spanish–American War? {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at .|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/William Thompson (Medal of Honor, 1950)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/William Thompson (Medal of Honor, 1950).|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/William Thompson (Medal of Honor, 1950)|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/William Thompson (Medal of Honor, 1950).}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, [http://stats.grok.se/en/201207/William_Thompson_(Medal_of_Honor,_1950) quick check]) and it will be added to DYKSTATS if it got over 5,000. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

}} Graeme Bartlett (talk) 00:02, 21 July 2012 (UTC)

You know the drill... 7 days, hold, etc. etc. Ealdgyth - Talk 01:45, 26 July 2012 (UTC)

|}

:Much thanks! —Ed!^(talk) 12:20, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

• {{diff|Battle of Pusan Perimeter|509618451|501586617|diff of Battle of Pusan Perimeter}}

Hi. What do you think of that, by User:Cjhanley, who seems to mostly edit related to No Gun Ri Massacre and has a user name which would suggest they are the author. Special:Contributions/Cjhanley. For the time being, I {{diff|Battle of Pusan Perimeter|509727107|509708493|reverted it}}, and fixed the ref. I see other bits needful, too. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 06:57, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

: Also: I noticed this:

:* {{harvnb|Appleman|1998|p=181}}

:It's saying Appleman 1998, but I'm wondering if it's supposed to be Alexander 2003 per the name. It could easily just by a copypasta-typo. Another reason to eschew names refs. I'm updating it to {{t|sfn}} ATM. Br'er Rabbit (talk) 09:12, 29 August 2012 (UTC)

|}

The Military history WikiProject has started its 2012 project coordinator election process, where we will select a team of coordinators to organize the project over the coming year. If you would like to be considered as a candidate, please submit your nomination by 14 September. If you have any questions, do not hesitate to contact one of the current coordinators on their talk page. This message was delivered here because you are a member of the Military history WikiProject. – Military history coordinators (about the project • what coordinators do) 08:58, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

:Hi Ed, I hope that you consider nominating to be one of the coordinators - given your extensive experience (especially with the A class review process) you'd be perfect for the role. Regards, Nick-D (talk) 10:38, 10 September 2012 (UTC)

Hello, you are receiving this message because you are currently a participant of WikiProject Good articles. Since the creation of the WikiProject, over 200 user's have joined to help review good article nominations and contribute to other sections of the WikiProject. Over the years, several of these users have stopped reviewing articles and/or have become inactive with the project but are still listed as participates. In order to improve communications with other participants and get newsletters sent out faster (newsletters will begin to be sent out monthly starting in October) all participants that are no longer active with the WikiProject will be removed from the participants list.

If you are still interested in being a participant for this WikiProject, please sign your user name here and please help review some articles so we can reduce the size of the backlog. If you are no longer interested, you do not need to sign your name anywhere and your name will be removed from the participants list after the deadline. Remember that even if you are not interested at this time, you can always re-add your name to the list whenever you want. The deadline to sign your name on the page above will be November 1, 2012. Thank-you. 13:25, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

Sorry for having to send out a second message but a user has brought to my attention that a point mentioned in the first message should be clarified. If user's don't sign on this page, they will be moved to an "Inactive Participants" list rather then be being removed from the entire WikiProject. Sorry for any confusion.--Dom497 (talk)15:15, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

|-

| valign="top" style="border: 2px #30B060 solid; padding: 1em; width: 45%; background-color:#F0FFEA;" |

; Project NewsAs of October 2, 2012 at 19:05 (UTC).

• There are currently 15,862 Good Articles listed at WP:GA.

• The backlog at Good Article Nominations is 345 unreviewed articles. Out of 439 total nominations, 24 are on hold, 66 are under review, and 4 are seeking a second opinion. Please go to WP:GAN and review an article! Even just reviewing one will help!

::The oldest unreviewed articles are: General sejm, Prime Minister of Vietnam, Tanisha Thomas, Kosta Pećanac, and Jilly Kitzinger.

::The categories with the largest backlogs are: Social sciences and society (80 articles), Sports and recreation (70 articles), Music (63 articles), Theatre, film and drama (52 articles), and History (41 articles). Please consider reviewing articles within these sections.

::There are currently 13 articles up for reassessment at Good Article Reassessment. Please help out and go to WP:GAR and review an article! Remember that anyone can review articles that are listed under "Community Reassessment" even if another user has already listed their opinion...the more opinions, the better!

; Member News

• There are currently 222 members of WikiProject Good Articles! Welcome to all the new members that joined during the past 17 months! If you aren't yet part of WikiProject Good Articles and interested in joining WikiProject Good Articles, go here and add you name. Everyone is welcomed!

• This WikiProject, and the Good Article program as a whole, would not be where it is today without each and every one of its members! Thank you to all!

• If you haven't done so already, please remember to add your name to this list if you are still interested/active with this WikiProject. If you are no longer interested/active you don't need to add your name anywhere, you're name will be moved into a "inactive participant" list at the beginning of November. Inactive users will not receive future newsletters from this WikiProject via their talk page.

; GA Task forces

• There is currently not much going on at this time but there is a very large backlog. Until the next backlog elimination drive, please help reduce the number of nominations by reviewing articles and helping other reviewers that may need second opinions.

• Thanks to everyone who committed some time to help reduce the nominations backlog during the June-July 2012 backlog elimination drive. Most barnstars have been given out but there are still a few left. Participants that haven't gotten a barnstar yet should get it soon.

;Possible Fall/Winter 2012 Backlog Elimination Drive

• A discussion is currently being held on the WikiProject's talk page on weather another eliminations drive should take place within the next few months as the last one proved to be extremely successful. Please take the time to go to the the talk page and include your opinion on if you would be interested in taking part in a Fall/Winter 2012 elimination drive.

; Good Articles of the Month

Each month, 5 random good articles will be choose to be featured here as the good articles of the month.

• Barry (dog)
• I Love Bees
• Miles Copeland (Home and Away)
• London Country North East
• The Daily Show

| valign="http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Dom497/GA_Newsletter_Fall_2012" style="border: 2px #30B060 solid; padding: 1em; width: 45%; background-color: #F0FFEA;" |

; Some Tips About References/Sources

Having references included in articles is one of the most important aspects to a good article, let alone Wikipedia! Without them, no one would ever know what is true and what is false and Wikipedia probably wouldn't be where it is today. So this month, I will talk about how to check for references, how reliable they are, and so on and so forth.

The first thing to do when reviewing an nominee is to do a quick scan of the article. One of the things to look for is if the article has references! If you don't see a list at the bottom of the article page, quick-fail it.Before quick-failing the article, verify that one of the several referencing templates is correctly placed at the bottom of the article. If the template is not placed, try to place it to see if references are displayed. If this proof returns no references, then proceed to quick-failing. For newcomers, quick-failing is failing an article when you spot a problem before actually conducting a full review. If you do find a list of references (and in most cases you will) make sure to look through each and every one. If you want to save some time, use [http://toolserver.org/~dispenser/view/Checklinks this tool] as it will tell you if there are any problematic references in the article you are reviewing.

Next, check the reliability and type of the references/sources. In terms of the type of reference, check to see how many primary and/or secondary sources are included. Primary sources are the ones published by the subject of the article. For example, if the subject of the article has to do with the iPhone 4s and the source is published by Apple, it is considered a primary source. Secondary sources are those not published by the subject of the article (or in close relation to it). Newspapers are examples of secondary sources and considered one of the better types to include in the article (not saying primary sources are bad). If you find that most/all of the references are primary sources, notify the nominator about this issue(s) and place the article on hold once you have completed the review. Only in the event that a secondary source can't be found as a replacement, then the primary source can remain. If there is a good mix of primary and secondary sources, that is perfect and no references need to be changed.

Now, reliability. Forums are generally not considered reliable and some blog's may not be reliable either. Newspapers, most sources published by the subject, some blogs, etc. are considered reliable. If you don't know wether the source is reliable, ask for a second opinion. For more info about how to identify wether a reference is reliable or not, visit this article.

Finally, one of the more basic things to look for is that every statement in the article has at least one reference! The only case that a statement doesn't need a reference is when it is common sense that the statement is defiantly true and/or in the case where the statement can't be challenged, as per what Wikipedia says, "All quotations and any material challenged or likely to be challenged must be attributed to a reliable published source using an inline citation."

; From the Editor

After a long 18 month hiatus, the third volume of the WikiProject Good Articles newsletter is here! Please leave any comments or feedback regarding this issue of the newsletter here or on the editors talk page.

Also, Happy Halloween...in advance!!!

PLEASE READ: If you do not wish to receive future WikiProject Good Articles newsletter's on your talk page, please remove your self from this list. If you are viewing this newsletter from the WikiProject Good Articles page or on someone else's talk page and want to receive future newsletters on your talk page, please add your name to the list linked above.

; Contributors to this Issue

• Dom497 (Editor of this Issue)

; Did You Know...

• ... that 2,100 articles have been reviewed during all backlog elimination drives combined?
• ... that out of 4,055,039 articles on Wikipedia, only 15,846 are good articles?File:Jack-o-lantern.svg
• ... that there are currently over 400 video game good articles?

;Notes

{{reflist}}

|-

| colspan="2" valign="top" style="border: 2px #30B060 solid; padding: 1em; width: 55%; background-color: #F0FFEA;" |

Improving Wikipedia one article at a time since 2005!

|-

| colspan="2" valign="top" style="border: 2px #30B060 solid; padding: 1em; width: 55%; background-color: #F0FFEA;" |

{{WikiProjectGATasks|centered=yes}}

|-

| valign="top" colspan="2" style="padding: 0.5em; text-align: right; font-size: 85%; " |

|}

|}

→ Please direct all enquiries regarding this newsletter to the WikiProject talk page.
→ Newsletter delivered by ENewsBot (info) · 05:34, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

|}

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 170th Infantry Brigade (United States), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Stars and Stripes (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:58, 11 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited United States Army, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Washington State (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:16, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

|}

|}

|-

|

-------------------

|}

I suggested Jesse L. Brown for TFA, there's a debate you may want to take part in. --Gerda Arendt (talk) 12:24, 14 November 2012 (UTC)

:accepted --Gerda Arendt (talk) 16:00, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

::Ah, well that's great news! Thanks for letting me know. —Ed!^(talk) 16:16, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

This is a note to let the main editors of Jesse L. Brown know that the article will be appearing as today's featured article on December 4, 2012. You can view the TFA blurb at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/December 4, 2012. If you prefer that the article appear as TFA on a different date, or not at all, please ask featured article director {{user|Raul654}} or his delegate {{user|Dabomb87}}, or start a discussion at Wikipedia talk:Today's featured article/requests. If the previous blurb needs tweaking, you might change it—following the instructions at Wikipedia:Today's featured article/requests/instructions. If this article needs any attention or maintenance, it would be preferable if that could be done before its appearance on the Main Page. The blurb as it stands now is below:

File:Jesse L. Brown 1948.jpg

Jesse L. Brown (1926–1950) was the first African-American naval aviator in the United States Navy, and the first naval officer killed in the Korean War. Born in Hattiesburg, Mississippi, to an impoverished family, Brown had an avid interest in aircraft from a young age. After graduating as salutatorian of his high school, he enlisted in the US Navy in 1946 and became a midshipman one year later. He earned his pilot wings on 21 October 1948 amid a flurry of press coverage. He was subsequently assigned to Fighter Squadron 32 aboard the {{USS|Leyte|CV-32|6}}. At the outset of the Korean War, the Leyte was ordered to the Korean Peninsula, arriving in October 1950. Brown flew 20 combat missions before his F4U Corsair aircraft came under fire and crashed on a remote mountaintop on 4 December 1950 during a mission supporting ground troops at the Battle of Chosin Reservoir. Brown died of his wounds in spite of efforts by wingman Thomas J. Hudner, Jr., who intentionally crashed his aircraft attempting a rescue and was later awarded the Medal of Honor. Brown's successes in the segregated US military were memorialized in several books, and the frigate {{USS|Jesse L. Brown|FF-1089}} was named in his honor. (Full article...)

UcuchaBot (talk) 23:01, 28 November 2012 (UTC)

:Congrats on the TFA, Ed -- damn medal ribbons an' all... ;-) Cheers, Ian Rose (talk) 01:08, 4 December 2012 (UTC)

::I thank you! —Ed!^(talk) 15:39, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

Well thanks very much! I appreciate it. —Ed!^(talk) 15:40, 8 December 2012 (UTC)

: A year ago, you were the 324th recipient of my PumpkinSky Prize, --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:53, 4 December 2013 (UTC)

: Four years ago, you were recipient no. 324 of Precious, a prize of QAI! --Gerda Arendt (talk) 07:17, 4 December 2016 (UTC)

|}

|}

|-

|

-------------------

|}

Hi Ed. I see you're contributing quite a bit to the AfD discussions. I want to point out that "per nom" and "per above" are considered arguments to avoid and many editors and admins who close AfD's do not weigh in those contributions to the discuss as heavily or sometimes at all when making their decision. Any way, if you're already taking the time to read the articles and examine the AfD then you should make sure your discussion contributions are fully being considered in scale with your opinion. Hope this helps. Mkdw^talk 11:02, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

:Ah, thank you for letting me know. I haven't contributed to AfD in some time, and I'm just getting back to Wikipedia after an extended absence, so I haven't been up on these sort of things. I'll take care to be more clear in my reasoning in the future AfDs. —Ed!^(talk) 14:21, 17 December 2012 (UTC)

I've made some significant changes to the article. Cheers, Lord Roem (talk) 02:21, 19 December 2012 (UTC)

:I've added lots more to the 'subsequent developments' section. Thanks, Lord Roem (talk) 22:48, 22 December 2012 (UTC)

::Great work. Made some final comments for improvements before I'm ready to pass it for GA. —Ed!^(talk) 02:39, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

:::Want to thank you again for the review. Have a great holiday! All the best, Lord Roem (talk) 16:57, 23 December 2012 (UTC)

|}

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited George S. Patton, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Scots Irish, Captain (rank) and Colt .45 (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:30, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

I don't think that I'd seen volume 2 of this book: {{cite book|last1=Polmar|first1=Norman|last2=Genda |first2=Minoru |authorlink2=Minoru Genda|title=Aircraft Carriers: A History of Carrier Aviation and Its Influence on World Events|publisher=Potomac Books|location=Washington, D.C.|year=2006|volume=Volume 1, 1909–1945|isbn=1-57488-663-0}} when I reviewed your Philippine Sea article, but it has a fair amount of info on air groups in the post-war period. I think that it would be definitely worth your while if you want to do more articles on the Essex's.--Sturmvogel 66 (talk) 17:08, 28 December 2012 (UTC)

:Much thanks. I'll look to that for improving the two I've already been working on. —Ed!^(talk) 18:19, 31 December 2012 (UTC)

Hello Ed!, and welcome to the 2013 WikiCup! Your submissions' page is here. The competition begins at midnight UTC. The first round will last until the end of February, at which point the top 64 scorers will advance to the second round. We will be in touch at the end of every month, and signups are going to remain open until the end of January; if you know of anyone else who may like to take part, please let them know! A few reminders: *The rules can be found here. There have been a few changes from last year, which are listed on that page. *Anything you submit must have been nominated and promoted in 2013, and you need to have completed significant work upon it in 2013. (The articles you review at good article reviews does not need to have been nominated in 2013, but you do need to have started the review in 2013.) We will be checking. *If you feel that another competitor is breaking the rules or abusing the competition in some way, please let a judge know. Please do not remove entries from the submissions' pages of others yourself. *Don't worry about calculating precisely how many points everything is worth. The bot will do that. The bot may occasionally get something wrong- let a judge know, or post on the WikiCup talk page if that happens. *Please try to be prompt in updating submissions' pages so that they can be double-checked. Overall, however, don't worry, and have fun. It doesn't matter if you make the odd mistake; these things happen. Questions can be asked on the WikiCup talk page. Good luck! J Milburn and The ed17 18:17, 31 December 2012 (UTC)