User talk:Etaittunpe

{{unblock reviewed|1=I was just returning the page to its last version (Since which it was changed before getting consensus, see the discussion page [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(numbers)#Why_you_can.27t_remove_section_.22Notability_of_special_functions.22)]|decline=That's not an excuse for editwarring. I'm extending your block to a week since you have been also abusing a sockpuppet account, {{vandal|Georgesy}}, which was caught in your autoblock.  Sandstein  09:25, 15 February 2009 (UTC)}}

Do not overwrite prior unblock requests, or this page will be protected.  Sandstein  12:42, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|1=Please check in, someone is trying to disturb my contributions, sorry for overwriting (it is my first use of this block, so I copied correctly but pasted wrongly) I hope ont to be punished for this!!:) |decline=The three-revert rule applies to all of us, even when we believe ourselves to be in the right. Next time, try one of the strategies at WP:DISPUTE to avoid edit-warring. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 13:34, 15 February 2009 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|1=Sir FisherQueen, you acknowledge it is the first time, Please be sure it is also the last, and unblock me. Thank you for forgiving! three-revert rule was done while my computer was SHUT-DOWN!!!!??> |decline=If that's so, then per WP:GOTHACKED we will have to leave the account blocked. Daniel Case (talk) 16:21, 15 February 2009 (UTC)}}

:If the account is compromised, shouldn't this be changed to an indefinite block? -FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 00:42, 16 February 2009 (UTC)