User talk:Etcnoel1#Block for ‘‘sockpuppet’’

File:Information orange.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sikorki (talk) 07:13, 17 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi. See WP:GS/AA as several Armenia and Azerbaijan related topics are under an extended confirmed [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:General_sanctions/Armenia_and_Azerbaijan#Community_discussion restriction]. You are not allowed to edit these topics as you’re not an extended confirmed user. Vanezi (talk) 10:42, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Commons-emblem-notice.svg You have recently made edits related to Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts. This is a standard message to inform you that Armenia, Azerbaijan, or related conflicts is a designated contentious topic. This message does not imply that there are any issues with your editing. For more information about the contentious topics system, please see Wikipedia:Contentious topics. Vanezi (talk) 10:42, 19 February 2025 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|decline=Trying to decide whether or not you're a sockpuppet becomes pretty redundant, once you've confessed you're a sockpuppet master. Address that in your next appeal (if you decide to lodge one). DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:33, 3 April 2025 (UTC)|1=well the reason I was blocked in the first place is that the admins suspected me of being “AssyrianCrusader” (which I am not). This person had previously made similar edits to mine by editing the same Wikipedia pages. Moreover, AssyrianCrusader was blocked and they suspected me of being him on another account, and that is why they blocked me. The reason as to why me and him edit the “same pages” in the first place is because we’re both Assyrian, we both were just trying to optimize our own Wikipedia pages. Either way, i obviously have no connection to him whatsoever and should therefore be unblocked. Us making similar edits has to do with the fact that we’re both Assyrian, I was myself trying to improve the pages. Etcnoel1 (talk) 06:18, 2 April 2025 (UTC)}}

• Is the {{np|NinosDg}} account yours? PhilKnight (talk) 11:39, 2 April 2025 (UTC)

• yes it’s my account which I made in order to get unblocked on this one, however i didn’t figure anything out until now. Etcnoel1 19:28, 2 April 2025 (UTC)
• :@PhilKnight Etcnoel1 (talk) 06:50, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|reason=So apparently from my understanding, I was blocked for being a sockpuppet “master”. However On Wikipedia, sockpuppetry, refers to the misuse of multiple Wikipedia accounts. The intention of me creating a new account was not to misuse it, but to understand as to why I got blocked in the first place.. why I got blocked in the first place on my original account was because I was falsely convicted of being a different Assyrian who was blocked before me, called “AssyrianCrusader”. So to sum it up, I was falsely accused of sockpuppetry in the first place on suspicion that I was AssyrianCrusader making different accounts. Given that this was all just a big misunderstanding, I believe I should be unblocked. Etcnoel1 (talk) 14:34, 3 April 2025 (UTC)|accept=As discussed below, you've been unblocked. Please stick to using this one account and avoid editing while logged-out. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:10, 7 April 2025 (UTC)}}

: Maybe you weren't a sock puppet before, but you're engaging in sock puppetry now. If you settled on using one account and stopped editing while logged out, I could see unblocking you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 18:03, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

::it was not my intention to “sockpuppet”, and i was was not misusing the new account, I was making additions and adjustments to wiki pages while also reverting a lot of vandalism. I should’ve settled on one account and I admit my mistake, however I'm fairly new and was at the time unaware. It won’t happen again. Etcnoel1 (talk) 18:35, 3 April 2025 (UTC)

::: {{re|The Wordsmith}} I don't think this editor should have been blocked in the first place. They eventually engaged in sock puppetry nonetheless, so one could argue that they should stay blocked. But if they stick to one account, we could probably just put the whole thing behind us. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 22:10, 4 April 2025 (UTC)

::::I can promise you all that sockpuppeting was not my intention at all, I didn’t mean for all of this to happen. I apologize for my mistake and it truly won’t happen again, I’ll stick to one account only. Etcnoel1 (talk) 17:18, 5 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::@NinjaRobotPirate@The Wordsmith Please guys, look into this, I really think it’s all a big misunderstanding. Etcnoel1 (talk) 20:37, 6 April 2025 (UTC)

::::::does the name "Assyrian beg" ring any bells for you, stating "Coming soon" on discord (can show image via mail)? it seems to me, that there has been a off-wiki coordination in which you have participated in with another editor on the now deleted Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sack of Amadiye. this raises worries of potential meat-puppetry. should we perhaps look at this any further @NinjaRobotPirate @The Wordsmith? Wlaak (talk) 18:38, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

::::{{yo|NinjaRobotPirate}} I believe I mentioned it on the SPI, but if the user understands that sockpuppetry is not allowed and agrees to stick to one account then I'm fine with unblocking. The Wordsmith^{Talk to me} 22:03, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

:::::Yeah and let me just say this, I have no connection to any "Assyrian Beg". He’s just throwing out assumptions and accusations on me. It seems he just have hate for me, this kind of hate doesn’t belong on Wikipedia in my opinion. Etcnoel1 (talk) 05:19, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::Hate? I just asked a question. Wlaak (talk) 09:31, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::::You just accused me of being someone I’m not Etcnoel1 (talk) 11:58, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::::It is not called hate, do not make this personal. Wlaak (talk) 12:24, 3 May 2025 (UTC)

Image:Information.svg Hello, I'm Catalyzzt. I noticed that in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Draft%3ABattle%20of%20Aqra%20Dagh%20%281920%29&diff=1284569863 this edit] to :Draft:Battle of Aqra Dagh (1920), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Catalyzzt (talk) 13:08, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:Yes I apologize, me and my friend who is the owner of the page, was working on the page as we made huge mistakes when first releasing it, so we put it into a draft. It’s now finished and rereleased! Etcnoel1 (talk) 15:43, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at :Rawadid dynasty. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Sikorki (talk) 04:04, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

:Okay sorry, thanks for telling me. Etcnoel1 (talk) 12:13, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Ohnoitsjamie. I noticed that one or more of your recent contribution attempts have been [{{fullurl:Special:AbuseLog|wpSearchUser=Etcnoel1}} disallowed by an edit filter] as they did not appear constructive. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. If you believe the edit filter disallowance was a false positive, please report it here. Feel free to ask for assistance at the Teahouse whenever you like. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 15:55, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

:Thank you for your help. Etcnoel1 (talk) 21:55, 8 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information_orange.svg Please refer to WP:Vandalism before repeatedly mentioning vandalism in your edit summaries, as it seems you are not fully aware of the meaning of the term. Off-wiki coordination also appears to be occurring and involving you; I highly urge you to stop this.

Avoid changing the terms Syriac and Assyrian, as these involve highly sensitive ANI disputes. A single source does not outweigh the majority of others, nor the subject’s own biography and film. Your source appears to be an example of WP:CHERRYPICKING, even though it does mention the population of the region as Syriacs frequently.

Cheers.

----Wlaak (talk) 17:13, 22 April 2025 (UTC)

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a report involving you at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement regarding a possible violation of an Arbitration Committee decision. Thank you. Vanezi (talk) 20:38, 30 April 2025 (UTC)