User talk:EvergreenFir#We appeal to the highest authority

User talk:Steevez Doug Weller talk 19:03, 6 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Doug Weller definitely worth keeping an eye on. Not sure I'd block them quite yet, but if they continue with the BLP violations then I would. EvergreenFir (talk) 17:41, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

::Agreed. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 18:09, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

I think {{vandal|Peep&Pocoyo10}} is a new sock of Zorn. They're using the phrases "nothing in article indicates than" and "already placed in subcat," in edit summaries, both of which are common to their socks. wizzito | say hello! 16:07, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Wizzito sure looks that way! Blocked EvergreenFir (talk) 16:58, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi there. I made a report at AIV and you responded [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrator_intervention_against_vandalism&diff=prev&oldid=1292605385 here]. Would you have a moment to look at Sterling, Virginia. I don't want to keep reverting this editor. I left a message on their talk page [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:LogicalLeaf129&diff=prev&oldid=1292433863 specifically indicating] the unsourced content. Yet they keep adding it back (that was just one example; there were others). Two editors have been very detailed in their messaging to this editor, but they keep making the same edits. Your help would be appreciated. Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 14:41, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:@Magnolia677 When I reviewed the report, the most recent edits ([https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sterling,_Virginia&diff=prev&oldid=1292450150], [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Sterling,_Virginia&diff=prev&oldid=1292439269]) included sources. The user heeded the talk page warnings in general. If there was a specific part of the text in question, that would be a content issue. The user's behavior was not obvious vandalism. EvergreenFir (talk) 14:59, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

::You're right. I can't keep up with this editor. Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 15:07, 28 May 2025 (UTC)