User talk:Explicit#The King: Eternal Monarch

Please can I see the deleted articles Shireen Irani, Shireen Jinnah and Stryder7x. Davidgoodheart (talk) 00:12, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} [https://pastesio.com/shireen-irani Shireen Irani], [https://pastesio.com/shireen-jinnah Shireen Jinnah], [https://pastesio.com/stryder7x Stryder7x]. ✗plicit 11:14, 11 May 2025 (UTC)

::Please can I see the deleted article Kelly Wilson (comedian). Davidgoodheart (talk) 18:36, 12 May 2025 (UTC)

:::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} [https://pastesio.com/kelly-wilson Kelly Wilson (comedian)]. ✗plicit 14:36, 14 May 2025 (UTC)

::::Please can I see deleted the article Jhessye Shockley. Davidgoodheart (talk) 20:07, 15 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} This page was just a redirect to List of murder convictions without a body. ✗plicit 11:27, 17 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::Please can the deleted article Andreas of Reichbinder, the redirected articles Iceberg (G.I. Joe) and Monkeywrench (G.I. Joe) and the link to all the deleted Wikipedia articles. Davidgoodheart (talk) 19:53, 19 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} [https://pastesio.com/andreas-of-reichbinder Andreas of Reichbinder], [https://pastesio.com/iceberg-gi-joe Iceberg (G.I. Joe)], [https://pastesio.com/monkeywrench-gi-joe Monkeywrench (G.I. Joe)]. ✗plicit 11:45, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::::Can I please see the deleted articles Table hockey (disambiguation) and Coin football (disambiguation). Davidgoodheart (talk) 16:38, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} [https://pastesio.com/table-hockey-disambiguation Table hockey (disambiguation)]. Coin football (disambiguation) was a redirect to Penny football. It originally pointed to Coin football, which was a disambiguation page that was redirected. ✗plicit 03:45, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::Please can I see the deleted articles National Wrestling League, NWL Heavyweight Championship, NWL Tag Team Championship, and the 2015 Kocho killings. Davidgoodheart (talk) 06:25, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} [https://pastesio.com/national-wrestling-league National Wrestling League], [https://pastesio.com/nwl-heavyweight-championship NWL Heavyweight Championship], [https://pastesio.com/nwl-tag-team-championship NWL Tag Team Championship], [https://pastesio.com/2015-kocho-killings 2015 Kocho killings]. ✗plicit 00:51, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::::Please let me see the deleted article Jimmy Jannetty, Laura Donnelly (disambiguation), Carlos Soler (disambiguation), and Frank Wang (disambiguation). Davidgoodheart (talk) 18:04, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} [https://pastesio.com/jimmy-jannetty Jimmy Jannetty], [https://pastesio.com/laura-donnelly-disambiguation Laura Donnelly (disambiguation)], [https://pastesio.com/carlos-soler-disambiguation Carlos Soler (disambiguation)], [https://pastesio.com/frank-wang-disambiguation Frank Wang (disambiguation)]. ✗plicit 23:52, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::::::Please can I see the deleted article Josselyn Garciglia. Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:08, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} [https://pastesio.com/josselyn-garciglia Josselyn Garciglia]. ✗plicit 03:18, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::::::::::::Please can I see deleted articles Sarah Hamilton (politician) and Cameron Johnston (disambiguation). Davidgoodheart (talk) 17:18, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::::::::::::::{{Reply to|Davidgoodheart}} [https://pastesio.com/sarah-hamilton-politician Sarah Hamilton (politician)], [https://pastesio.com/cameron-johnston-disambiguation Cameron Johnston (disambiguation)]. ✗plicit 12:01, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Explicit, and thank you for your contributions. I see that you deleted a page about Connect User group in 2023. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Articles_for_deletion/Connect_(users_group)

I work for Connect and would like to provide you with whatever additional sources regarding Connect's legitimacy you would like, including from hpe.com (such as https://www.hpe.com/us/en/communities.html - we are linked in the bottom right box.) We are the independent technology user group for HPE. Our publications have been produced for over 30 years, one (the connection- connect2nonstop.com) in print until just 2018 before going entirely digital. We host the annual NonStop Technology and Business Conference (formerly technical boot camp) attended by 300+ for over a decade, and have over a dozen regional chapters, many with their own websites and events referencing us. Please let me know how to best provide you with the information you need to restore the article. Thanks. ConnectWorldwide (talk) 19:25, 21 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm sorry, I should have clarified. That was me who created that draft {{dash}} I just forgot to log in when I made it. After that, I contributed to it further while logged in. I can even log out now and post a message here verifying that the IP there is mine. Thanks for being mindful, though. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 00:18, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:Of course, if you think it might merit an article, we can keep it around for a little bit. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 00:20, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::{{Reply to|Balsam Cottonwood}} Hi, since you say you created the page while logged out, I went ahead and deleted it the page as requested. Some users will sometimes tag pages with G7 for being major contributors, so I thought this was another case of that. ✗plicit 03:45, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Thanks. 🌳 Balsam Cottonwood (talk) ✝ 04:15, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi Explicit, I'm just curious to know what the state of the subject article was before you deleted it to make room for another page move (G6). I cannot see which page was moved, only that the Isoteinon bruno article/redirect was deleted for it. 'Cheers, Loopy30 (talk) 02:11, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Loopy30}} Hi, this redirect was tagged by {{U|Sjl197}} with the intent to move Astictopterus bruno to that title. ✗plicit 03:45, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

::Very good then. Where did the redirect point to? Loopy30 (talk) 10:57, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

:::{{Reply to|Loopy30}}. The request was for speedy deletion of a simple redirect from this now empty page of Isoteinon bruno. Beforehand, that redirect was Isoteinon bruno -> Astictopterus bruno. And yes, as per above the intent was/is to move Astictopterus bruno into Isoteinon then make a few updates the page for that species. Also to move some other "Astictopterus" spp into Isoteinon, then fix the genus page for Astictopterus to reflect that now it's essentially just Astictopterus jama remaining (but i won't make that formalised as monotypic due to some recent debate whether some of its "subspecies" are valid distinct species or not).

:::Generally, for the record i'll edit stuff on Wikispecies before delving into changes here on enwiki, for this case see [https://species.wikimedia.org/wiki/Isoteinon_bruno Isoteinon bruno] on Wikispecies. Essence being that Isoteinon bruno Evans, 1937 is the protonym, despite what several online resources reflect, and that combination is the linked Zhang et al., 2023 genomic study. Actually, i can't find any good sources for the recombination Astictopterus bruno, if you know any then please say! Sjl197 (talk) 13:35, 22 May 2025 (UTC)

I'm interested in photograohy, but I do not know where to start. I know there are a lot of experienced photographers on Wikipedia, but after reading your userpage, I decided to talk to you. Can you please guide me through on how you got into photography and where you started?. Also did you take photos of those korean/foreign footballers by going to their matches?. I'd really appreciate it if you could reply. Even though it's not a question heavily related to Wikipedia. Thanks... Vinizex94🌍 12:47, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Vinizex94}} Hmm, it's hard to pinpoint when I took interest in photography. Maybe it started around the time I got a Nikon Coolpix S70 (don't remember why) and took some crappy photos of One Ok Rock (1, 2, 3, 4, 5). The band had announced a free live performance, and since it wasn't particular common for Japanese acts to hold concerts outside of Japan, I guess I felt the need to document it somehow.

:I didn't truly pick up photography until 2018, when I visited home and bought a Nikon D5600, an entry-level camera. With the help of tutorials on YouTube, I simply kept showing up at free public events to take photos to develop my skills. You can see the progression of my photography at :c:Category:Photographs taken by Explicit, as it is mostly sorted by date. My subjects of interest have shifted a lot over the years. I bought a Nikon D850 in 2020, right before COVID hit, so that was a great way to let the camera gather dust for two and a half years. Learning how to maneuver that camera was a learning curve for me.

:Yes, I'm pretty much at every FC Seoul home game these days. I do want to take photos of other subjects, but it's hard to find the time and interest. ✗plicit 01:00, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks for replying. It means a lot Vinizex94🌍 01:35, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Explicit! I hope your day has been well 🙂 I have a question about the fair use file you recently deleted "File:Denys Davydov channel profile.jpg", which was used in the infobox as the channel profile for journalist and YouTuber Denys Davydov, which can only be found on his [https://www.youtube.com/@DenysDavydov YouTube page]. You deleted it because it "violates non-free content criterion #1", but I don't believe it does? If there is a free alternative of this photo or any photo of him for that matter can you please show me so I can include some kind of illustration on the page? Otherwise, can you explain why this photo couldn't be used, because I don't understand how it didn't meet criteria. Cheers! Johnson524 22:14, 24 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Johnson524}} Hi, Wikipedia policy generally does not allow the use of non-free photos of living people, even if a freely licensed photo does not exist at the moment. Because the subject is alive and active, it fails to meet the first criterion of the NFCC policy: {{xt|"Non-free content is used only where no free equivalent is available, or could be created, that would serve the same encyclopedic purpose."}} ✗plicit 00:17, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

The file :File:Tamil Genocide acts, Mullivaikkal Massacre, Displacement.png was nominated for speedy deletion for no reason by user ÆthelflædofMercia, even when fair use rationale was given as its really necessary and important for the illustration for the said article Tamil Genocide and for its encyclopedic discussion, the use of it is limited and is in low resolution and

It cannot be replaced with free media as there is no similar or related images of it that's released under creative commons licenses and now the same user has nominated the page again for deletion with different deletion notice, as the previous attempt of deleting the file failed, now spamming notices to do anything to remove anything related to Tamil genocide on Wikipedia, with twisting the integrity of the image, when all of images' context are confirmed in the linked US state department file and it being related to Tamil Genocide, which is established with extensive sources in the article itself with detailed sourced explanation of the depictions and illustrations that is shown in image, which is why the main rational being for its use is for encyclopedic discussion of the article, the new user has been non stop going around Wikipedia doing the same to remove anything Tamil Genocide, so requesting to take action against it and protect the image page against vandalism. Yarohj (talk) 14:21, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Yarohj}} I have removed the tag, but only because the file's deletion would not be uncontroversial. I can not see how their request for deletion is disruptive. As I stated in my edit summary, the issue requires further discussion, and I have directed the user to WP:FFD. ✗plicit 00:51, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

Good afternoon, you removed File:Australian Distinguished Service Cross.png despite the correct licencing being on the file as per F11 "Acceptable evidence of licensing normally consists of either a link to the source website where the license is stated", and the original uploader (me) not being notified with the prerequisite 7 days notice of any issue? Nford24 (PE121 Personnel Request Form) 02:03, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Nford24}} Hi, while it is highly encouraged to notify a page creator of an impending deletion, they are not required by policy. I gave this another look and restored the file while amending the source link. ✗plicit 03:31, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

I think the redirects are the correct critea. However, you probably no more than me. Bottom line is, these redirects are useless, needless, and the editor that created all of them either is trying to artifically inflate their edit count, something to do with WP:FANCRUFT, or simply got carried away in the excitement of creating them.

I previously asked an administrator what the correct speedy deletion critea (I think that's what it is) and he said WP:R3. If that's incorrct, could you tell me which would be the correct one? Lemonademan22 (talk) 14:02, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Lemonademan22}} The redirects you tagged were not eligible for speedy deletion. You are free to nominate them for discussion at WP:RFD. ✗plicit 23:52, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Please undelete shortcuts and any other meaningful G8'd pages linking to Wikipedia:One hundred words, a new page that I've created. —Alalch E. 18:31, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Alalch E.}} {{Done}}, five redirects restored. ✗plicit 23:52, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Explicit,

Since you were the administrator that deleted the Luke Nichols article, I figured I would contact you here.

Nichols runs a viral YouTube channel by the name of [https://www.youtube.com/outdoorboys Outdoor Boys]. His recent [https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=VwC8jwnXfo4 "Goodbye"] video generated a lot of significant coverage (as seen [https://www.google.com/search?sca_esv=36ac96dba69ebed1&q=luke+nichols&tbm=nws&source=lnms&fbs=AIIjpHxU7SXXniUZfeShr2fp4giZ1Y6MJ25_tmWITc7uy4KIeqDdErwP5rACeJAty2zADJjYuUnSkczEhozYdaq1wZrEheAY38UjnRKVLYFDREDmzxDQH5cf73Nv5SUwLly1WG2RRTz5Zp2Uvco3Dr76giEv7KoLdER8DerohCvE5WYq8IvfNQRQHkwcsZAmUfFI3CBSx3HjRSebGup2eLjFz8thpHIe2Q&sa=X&sqi=2&ved=2ahUKEwjpoZ_K1MSNAxUPGFkFHeBbO_kQ0pQJegQIDhAB&biw=1440&bih=738&dpr=2 here] and [https://www.google.com/search?q=outdoor+boys&sca_esv=36ac96dba69ebed1&biw=1440&bih=738&tbm=nws&ei=kTc2aOWBBobIptQPxpOJgQs&ved=0ahUKEwiljofL1MSNAxUGpIkEHcZJIrAQ4dUDCA4&uact=5&oq=outdoor+boys&gs_lp=Egxnd3Mtd2l6LW5ld3MiDG91dGRvb3IgYm95czIQEAAYgAQYsQMYQxiDARiKBTIQEAAYgAQYsQMYQxiDARiKBTILEAAYgAQYsQMYgwEyCxAAGIAEGLEDGIMBMgUQABiABDILEAAYgAQYsQMYgwEyBBAAGAMyDRAAGIAEGLEDGEMYigUyChAAGIAEGEMYigUyBRAAGIAESL4MUPsCWNYLcAJ4AJABAJgBU6ABwAaqAQIxM7gBA8gBAPgBAZgCD6ACgwfCAg4QABiABBixAxiDARiKBcICCBAAGIAEGLEDmAMAiAYBkgcCMTWgB8tJsgcCMTO4B_0G&sclient=gws-wiz-news here]), with major sources like Business Insider and Men's Journal covering it. Thus, if there is any way to recover the work that had already been done, could you draftify what had been deleted so I can make improvements to the article?

Thanks! KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 22:10, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|KnowledgeIsPower9281}} Hi, I have restored the page and it is available at Draft:Luke Nichols. ✗plicit 23:52, 27 May 2025 (UTC)

::Sounds good! Thank you for letting me know! KnowledgeIsPower9281 (talk) 02:10, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

An editor has asked for a deletion review of :List of Sony Bravia televisions. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. Punkt64 (talk) 18:57, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, i was investigating some redirects that Galactikapedia made and found the redirects for deletion pages that you started, which are much appreciated. I was just gonna say that there are quite a few more pages like that (including an entire family of flatworms) so i'm going to link the [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Contributions&end=&namespace=all&start=&tagfilter=mw-new-redirect&target=Galactikapedia&offset=&limit=100 list here]. Perhaps you can notify Wikipedia:Tree of Life for help with this continuing issue. Thanks for starting the work to fixing these. Anthropophoca (talk) 23:28, 28 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Anthropophoca}} Hi, those redirects were deleted as a result of discussions at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2025 March 1. I did not nominate them personally. Additional redirects need to be nominated there as well. ✗plicit 03:18, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

::I am aware of that page. I'm still thanking you for bringing it up there and starting the initiative. Anthropophoca (talk) 08:03, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello @Explicit,

I'm seeking your assistance regarding a user who recently left messages on my Talk Page. For context, you can view the conversation here.

My concern is that this user referenced a few editors and pages, but after checking, they don’t appear to exist. I also attempted to search for them manually, but with no success. Could you please verify this?

Additionally, if possible, I would appreciate it if you could review the user's edit history, particularly their changes to the R. Donahue Peebles and Peebles Corporation pages. Now that the user has raised a COI (Conflict of Interest) issue, I believe their own editing behavior warrants closer examination. The tone of their contributions appears unusually negative, which raises the possibility that they may be a competitor or someone previously associated with Peebles.

Since they’ve questioned my edits, I will refrain from making further changes to these pages and leave the matter in your hands for review. I would be grateful if you could also look into the user’s activity.

Thank you for your time and support. Axeia.aksaya (talk) 14:37, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Axeia.aksaya}} Hi, in regards to the messages on your talk page, it appears that a single person is trying to intimidate you by posing as several different editors—they certainly don't exist. I would take them with a grain of salt.

:Regarding their edits in other articles, it's difficult to take any action as the IP has not edited for two weeks now. Any further resumption of problematic editing should be report at the Administrators' noticeboard for incidents. ✗plicit 12:01, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

You moved two articles from draft space back to user space and removed their speedy tags with the comment "no backdoor deletions":^{[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:GallupMS/Donald_O._Clifton_draft&diff=prev&oldid=1292908677][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bromogatos309/sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=1292908813]}

• User:GallupMS/Donald O. Clifton draft
• User:Bromogatos309/sandbox

In reviewing articles at CAT:CSD yesterday, both of these had {{tl|db-g13}} tags.^{[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bromogatos309/sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=1292749728][https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:GallupMS/Donald_O._Clifton_draft&diff=prev&oldid=1292752514]} Both looked like they might be notable, so I removed the G13 tags, then moved them to draft space for further review. It became clear that the Bromogatos309/sandbox article was hopeless and there was already a Donald O. Clifton article so I restored the G13 tags with these edit summaries:

• {{tq|"{Db-g13}: I temporarily removed the db-g13 tag yesterday to further investigate. I have not edited it other than to add tags. A Donald O. Clifton article exists."}}^{[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:GallupMS/Donald_O._Clifton_draft&diff=prev&oldid=1292905228]}

• {{tq|"{db-g13}. This was an abandoned user space page tagged for G13 deletion. I draftified it and temporarily removed the G13 tag pending investigation of its potential as an article. It's a dud. I have not edited except for adding templates"}}^{[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Bromogatos309/sandbox&diff=prev&oldid=1292905779]}

Whatever the procedural errors of my actions were, please understand my intent was not to attempt bad faith, backdoor deletions.

Regards, --A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 15:15, 29 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|A. B.}} I do not fault your actions in these instances. The editor who originally tagged them for deletion as G13 had done so without properly understanding the criterion—it does not apply to drafts in userspace that are not tagged as AFC submissions. I believe their actions gave you the wrong impression, as it had done to the admin who mistakenly deleted several similarly tagged userspace drafts. No harm done on your part. ✗plicit 12:01, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks. I was a little worried what you might think.

::I appreciate all the thoughtful work you do with deletions - a great example for all of us. A. B. ^{(talk • contribs • global count)} 12:33, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Hey there.
I am new to the AfDs and I have nominated an article, not sure whether the format is right or not. It would be great if you help me! The article is Chuknagar massacre. 𝗭𝗲𝗽𝗵𝘆𝗿 (ᴛᴀʟᴋ) 07:11, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Lt.gen.zephyr}} Hi, it seems that the only step you missed was to transclude the deletion discussion page onto the daily log at WP:AFD. Luckily, there's a bot that has taken care of that. You may want to consider installing Twinkle, as it can help streamline the deletion process across various deletion venues. ✗plicit 12:01, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Sorry to bother you again - We have another article just started by an account created on 25 May account (suspect not a new account from their editing ability). Could you please delete or redirect and salt?
We also still have Draft:War 2, Draft:War 2 (2025 film) 2, Draft:War 2 (2025 film) 4 and Draft:War 2 (2025 film) 5 - is there a way of consolidating these? - Best wishes - Arjayay (talk) 10:47, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Arjayay}} I've merged the page history with Draft:War 2 (2025 film) 3. If you suspect sockpuppetry is at play here, you should consider filing a case at WP:SPI. If these creations are coming from sockpuppets of a blocked user, every new version that comes along can be deleted as G5 instead of making additional drafts. Due to all the parallel page histories, there's not much to be done except redirect all the copies into a single drafts. ✗plicit 12:01, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks for that User:Explicit, but as the title is not salted, whereas War 2 is E/C protected, War 2 (2025) has been recreated, yet again. Could you please delete and salt this title? - Thanks - Arjayay (talk) 15:45, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

::: War 2 (2025) has been now moved to draft-space, but E/C protection would be appreciated - Arjayay (talk) 19:20, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

::::{{Reply to|Arjayay}} I have salted this title as well. In case you missed the ping, Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Adw.x.hs has been opened. ✗plicit 00:03, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello Explicit. I wanted to follow up with you on something. You recently deleted [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=File:Sonic_Crackers_and_Knuckles_Chaotix_comparison.png&action=edit&redlink=1 this image]. However, that image was already actively being discussed [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Files_for_discussion/2025_May_23#File:Sonic_Crackers_and_Knuckles_Chaotix_comparison.png here, where the only 2 formal responses were "keep"]. I wanted to check and see if you were willing to re-open for further discussion? I'm not really seeing a consensus there, and if I'm reading it right, it looks like it was present [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Knuckles%27_Chaotix&oldid=816823041 at the time of the article's promotion from GA to FA], so I would think its been scrutinized in the past too. Let me know. If you are, I'm willing to neutrally notify WP:VG of the discussion for further discussion too. Thank you. Sergecross73 msg me 15:00, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{Reply to|Sergecross73}} Hi, to claim that two editors argued keeping the file is a bit disingenuous, as you made your comments were made nearly an hour after I had already deleted the file (for the record, I don't manually close discussions at FFD because {{np|AnomieBOT}} can do that when the result is "delete" and the file linked in the header).

:Irrespective of that detail, neither of you adequately addressed the WP:NFC#Meeting the previous publication criterion: {{xt|" In rare cases however, non-free content may have been originally leaked and never subsequently published with the copyright holder's permission—such content must not be included in Wikipedia.}} This is not a consensus issue, it's a legal concern. Is there any evidence the copyright holder eventually published this particular screenshot? ✗plicit 00:03, 31 May 2025 (UTC)

::I simply commented on an open discussion I stumbled upon. Was that wrong? This feels like a rather rude response to someone who nicely asked if you would consider relisting if I did the legwork in scrounging up further discussion. Have I done something to upset you in the past or something? Because I can't make any sense of this sort of response otherwise. Sergecross73 msg me 01:20, 31 May 2025 (UTC)