User talk:Fad8229
Welcome!
Hi Fad8229! I noticed your contributions to :2020 United States Senate election in South Carolina and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.
As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:
{{Clickable button|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}
Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.
If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:
{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}
If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:
{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}
Happy editing! Marquardtika (talk) 15:08, 19 May 2025 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion|Speedy deletion]] nomination of [[:User:Fad8229/sandbox]]
Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as :User:Fad8229/sandbox, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pi.1415926535 (talk) 11:52, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
:WTF it’s a literal sandbox, I’m not going to make this public Fad8229 (talk) 16:46, 1 June 2025 (UTC)
[[Draft:Nathan Sage 1|Nathan Sage]] moved to draftspace
Thanks for your contributions to Nathan Sage 1. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources and it is mostly empty.
I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.
Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.
When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit the draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris talk! 07:16, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
:Thank you for your kind words. I added his page because some people say that he’s the strongest candidate to run against Joni Ernst, that why I created this page. I was worried that he would not get his page by the time of nomination and election. That’s another reason why I created this page. Fad8229 (talk) 13:25, 10 June 2025 (UTC)
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Nathan Sage 1|Nathan Sage 1]] (June 16)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=Per WP:POLOUTCOMES and related discussion, coverage of unsuccessful candidates for public office is generally considered WP:ROUTINE and a WP:BLP must meet WP:SIGCOV with coverage independent of that.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Nathan Sage 1 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Nathan_Sage_1 Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Chetsford&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Nathan_Sage_1 reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;" |
| style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello, Fad8229!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Chetsford (talk) 14:59, 16 June 2025 (UTC) |
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC