User talk:Gasp2009

You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Azviz for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Abductive (talk) 22:44, 27 July 2009 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|1=Toddst1 has been accused of sockpuppetry. In retaliation, Toddst1 has blocked his accuser (who was fed wrong information). This is a conflict of interest. I must be unblocked.
This is gone way out of hand. MuZemike originally filed a sockpuppet report here http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Azviz . Then an admitted sock, Abductive added my name http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FAzviz&diff=304566370&oldid=304564474 even though I am totally unrelated to the Canadian socks. None of my articles are the same and I do not de-prod articles like those socks are accused of. Abductive should be blocked for 1. disrupting a sockpuppet request and 2. for being a sockpuppetmaster who admits creating many socks. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAreas_for_Reform&diff=303825864&oldid=303821914 Abductive attacked me because I questioned him whether it was against policy to create socks. He then informed me that Toddst1 was a sock. I fell for the bait. I am sorry.
Even if Toddst1 got mad because he and I got attacked, he should not be blocking me. That is an example of an involved administrator butting in. Besides Toddst1 did not block the true bad person, Abductive. Again, I am sorry for getting involved in this mess. Please unblock}}

=This focuses more on other's actions than your own; your unblock request should address why you should be unblocked, not why others should be blocked. Also, the accusation against Todd seems to be quite spurious, so I don't believe it's much of a conflict of interest. Hersfold ^(t/a/c) 03:38, 29 July 2009 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|1=Hersfold asked me to focus the request on myself.
TIMELINE
1. I asked Abductive about his comment that he creates multiple socks for himself. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAreas_for_Reform&diff=303825864&oldid=303821914 . I AM SORRY. THIS WAS MY FIRST MISTAKE.
2. Muzemike files a sock report against 2 Canadian socks that de-prod articles. I am not them. I never deprod articles. I am not in Canada. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Azviz
3. Aductive maliciously adds my name to that Canadian sock report. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FAzviz&diff=304566370&oldid=304564474 Abductive then tells me that Toddst1 is a sock. I shouldn't have fell for the bait. I AM SORRY FOR TAKING THE BAIT.
4. I promise not to take the bait again. Please unblock me. If you really want punishment, would you shorten the block to 12 hours and I promise never again to have any contact with Abductive and will write productive stuff, as I was doing. Gasp2009 (talk) 03:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)|decline=No. This in no way addresses the reason for your block; you are plainly using this account in violation of WP:SOCK. Please log into your first account and request an unblock there. Jayron32 05:47, 30 July 2009 (UTC)}}

Hersfold asked me to focus the request on myself.

1. I asked Abductive about his comment that he creates multiple socks for himself. See http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3AAreas_for_Reform&diff=303825864&oldid=303821914 . I AM SORRY. THIS WAS MY FIRST MISTAKE.

2. Muzemike files a sock report against 2 Canadian socks that de-prod articles. I am not them. I never deprod articles. I am not in Canada. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Azviz

3. Aductive maliciously adds my name to that Canadian sock report. http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia%3ASockpuppet_investigations%2FAzviz&diff=304566370&oldid=304564474 Abductive then tells me that Toddst1 is a sock. I shouldn't have fell for the bait. I AM SORRY FOR TAKING THE BAIT.

4. I promise not to take the bait again. Please unblock me. If you really want punishment, would you shorten the block to 12 hours and I promise never again to have any contact with Abductive and will write productive stuff, as I was doing. Gasp2009 (talk) 03:56, 29 July 2009 (UTC)

I've been asked to consider unblocking this account. Before I consider such, I'd like to hear your explanation of these edits:

1. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User:Gasp2009&oldid=303881396 statement of sockpuppetry]
2. [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Sockpuppet_investigations/Azviz&diff=304625045&oldid=304624678 charming edit#1] [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Abductive&diff=prev&oldid=304625167 charming edit #2]

Toddst1 (talk) 00:59, 1 August 2009 (UTC)