User talk:Geschichte
{{Bots|deny= DPL bot,Theo's Little Bot}}
{{bots|optout=orfud}}
I will usually reply on this page only.
Nomination of [[:Sven Kloster]] for deletion
:Was this really necessary? Geschichte (talk) 06:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
::Notifying you two weeks ago that I started an AFD two weeks ago? Yes, that's required. - UtherSRG (talk) 11:27, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
:::I'm referring to the AFD itself. I believe it was reasonably clear that nothing in the article itself indicated that an AFD was warranted, something that also reflects on the AFC reviewer. Geschichte (talk) 15:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
::::Looking back on the edit history, I see why I made the AFD: You had questioned whether it would survive AFD. So I put it to the test. - UtherSRG (talk) 16:30, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding [[Draft:Vedat Vatansever]]
File:Information.svg Hello, Geschichte. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Vedat Vatansever, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
Concern regarding [[Draft:Olgun Karamanoğlu]]
File:Information.svg Hello, Geschichte. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Olgun Karamanoğlu, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.
If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 10:07, 11 March 2025 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);"
|rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | The Original Barnstar |
style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | For all your fantastic work in Afds! RossEvans19 (talk) 13:12, 13 March 2025 (UTC) |
- Thank you, Ross! Geschichte (talk) 06:52, 17 March 2025 (UTC)
Afd April Fools Day joke nomination
Hello there! I made a joke nomination about Gianluigi Buffon at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/April Fools' Day 2025 that, as we both participate in football AFD discussions, I thought you'd find funny (yes I look very desperate but it's still good humour) RossEvans19 (talk) 18:44, 1 April 2025 (UTC)
Nomination of [[:Satoshi Osaki]] for deletion
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Satoshi Osaki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.
[[Wikipedia:Proposed deletion|Proposed deletion]] of [[:Fathi Aboud]]
The article :Fathi Aboud has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Fails WP:SPORTSCRIT and WP:NOLY.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. LibStar (talk) 22:29, 3 April 2025 (UTC)
PRODs
Hello, Geschichte,
I'm one of the admins who regularly reviews the articles that you have PROD'd. Thanks for all of the work you've put in in this area over the past few years.
However, you often mention in a PROD tag if the article creator was later blocked. Unless they were a sockpuppet, this fact doesn't have much relevance as to whether or not an article should be deleted. It is more helpful to focus on issues of notability or verification rather than the character and status of the editors who worked on an article years ago. Since you tag so many articles for Proposed deletion, I thought I'd pass this along. Thank you for all of your contributions! Liz Read! Talk! 05:21, 7 April 2025 (UTC)
Proposed delection of [[Artan Thorja]]
Hi Geschichte, I have removed your proposal for deletion since the player clearly meets the criteria for notability in football, having played for four teams in fully professional leagues. Hansi667 (Neighbor Of The Beast) a penny for your thoughts? 12:15, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
:Those criteria do not exist anymore. I will nominate it for WP:AFD when I have time later. Geschichte (talk) 16:18, 8 April 2025 (UTC)
::Both WP:FPL and WP:FOOTYN are defunct. If that's the only reason for keeping Thorja then I think we should look at deletion. Spiderone(Talk to Spider) 09:40, 13 April 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, [[Draft:Olgun Karamanoğlu]]
Hello, Geschichte. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Olgun Karamanoğlu".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Olgun Karamanoğlu|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Your draft article, [[Draft:Vedat Vatansever]]
Hello, Geschichte. This message concerns the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Vedat Vatansever".
Drafts that go unedited for six months are eligible for deletion, in accordance with our draftspace policy, and this one has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:Vedat Vatansever|edit the submission}}, and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you read this, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions here. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the draft so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! DreamRimmer bot II (talk) 10:25, 9 April 2025 (UTC)
Lol
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Dag Petter Breivik|Dag Petter Breivik]] (April 23)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines for sports persons and athletes). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=From the provided sources, it appears the subject of the draft is not notable enough. Add more references that show the subjects notability if possible.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dag Petter Breivik and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk/New_question&withJS=MediaWiki:AFCHD-wizard.js&page=Draft:Dag_Petter_Breivik Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:NeoGaze&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:AfC_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Dag_Petter_Breivik reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
style="margin: 0.4em 2em;" |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello, Geschichte!
Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! NeoGaze (talk) 09:57, 23 April 2025 (UTC) |
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC