User talk:Guotaian

I’ve protected this page from IPs and new accounts for a short period of time due to the repeated apparent harassment here by an IP. Please let me or another admin know if you would like this protection extended or removed. _signed, Rosguill ^talk 17:38, 20 February 2025 (UTC)

This page was apparently created by ProKMT as a "compromise" with you over something? I'm getting a bit tired of them boldly making massive changes like this on the basis of a consensus of two editors. Can you please explain the background of this "compromise" to me? Because this is now a pretty big mess. Simonm223 (talk) 13:36, 21 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. ProKMT (talk) 10:35, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed |1=Dear Administrators, I am writing to appeal my one-week block because I believe it was a misunderstanding. A few weeks ago, I had requested a third opinion to resolve the dispute between me and Pro-KMT. The 3O had provided a clear solution regarding our disputes. Unfortunately, Pro-KMT did not follow the 3O, which led him undoing my edits and violating the 3RR . I was acting in good faith, and I respectfully request a reconsideration of my block. Best Regards, Guotaian |decline = Please make a new unblock request showing the outcome of the 3O. I couldn't immediately find this. Yamla (talk) 18:16, 18 March 2025 (UTC)}}

:Unless there's another 3O request that someone else started, this is referring to this, the response at each of those requests for a third opinion directs the discussion to a centralized discussion at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject China#Political ideology templates. I don't see a clear consensus for reverting edits like this (which is the pre-edit warring version) in that WikiProject discussion (which Guotaian did not participate in) and this discussion on the template talk page (which Guotaian also did not participate in) seems to show a distinct lack of consensus for Guotaian's edits on that page, yet they've made four reverts to that page since that discussion opened. Guotaian has not participated in any discussion that includes a party other than themselves of ProKMT has commented on, instead choosing to engage in edit warring. - Aoidh (talk) 23:21, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|decline=Edit warring is still edit warring even if you think you're just implementing consensus. -- asilvering (talk) 21:49, 21 March 2025 (UTC)|reason=Here is the 3O that you requested for: [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_China#Political_ideology_templates].}}

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Paper9oll. I noticed that you recently removed content from :Singapore without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — Paper9oll (🔔 • 📝) 06:43, 20 April 2025 (UTC)