User talk:Hcrater#Your submission at Articles for creation
Your submission at [[WP:AFC|Articles for creation]]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Two Body Dirac Equations.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via [http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=wikipedia-en-help real time chat with helpers], or on the
:Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Nouniquenames (talk) 05:39, 6 June 2012 (UTC)
[[Two Body Dirac Equations]]
Hi - thanks for creating this article! Could you please define the variables properly? I encountered it today and cleaned up much of the formatting, added links, and had to guess from the painfully vague statement:
:"As seen below, for two particles interacting by way of both world scalar and four-vector interactions, each equation has the same structure as the ordinary one-body Dirac equation in the presence of external scalar and vector potentials."
that "4-vector interaction" really meant "the electromagnetic interaction, described by the 4-potential, given that there is a γμ(pμ − Aμ) term, suggestivley the subtraction of the potential momentum from total momentum to yeild the kinetic momentum, and the mention of "scalar and vector potentials" which in physical context almost always refers to electromagnetic potentials. "4-vector interaction" is really meaningless - there are many 4-vectors and they are mathematical, a physical interaction arises from the fundamental forces. Also - what is a/the "world scalar " ? If you mean the scalar electric potential then its redundant - already included in the 4-potential. I tagged it with a "clarification needed" template for now.
Anyway, thanks in advance for your reply! Looking forwards to clarification. =)
F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑ici 13:51, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Also...
:Thanks for the feedback. In the last week I have added more material and more references to works that preceded and are included in the ones presented in the present (6/17/12) form of the paper. I hope the additions clarify. Would welcome any further feedback. Greatly appreciate the box of field theory links
:Horace Crater
:Hcrater (talk) 18:28, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
::Hcrater, I have taken the liberty of moving your reply. Normally that would be inappropriate on Wikipedia, but it is intended as help. You should always reply to a message below that message, or people will get confused. Also, indentations (using colons as formatting) help to distinguish each message from its reply. See talk page layout for more information. RockMagnetist (talk) 21:34, 17 June 2012 (UTC)
Welcome!
Hello, Hcrater, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (
before the question. Again, welcome!
Suprised you were not given a proper welcome, so here it is! F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑ici 13:51, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Original research..
I forgot to add - please do not write content which is your own work. Please see WP:OR, your page may be deleted if you do not provide secondary sources, that was most likey the main reason the page was refused at your request. I have removed your own references. Thank you. F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑ici 13:58, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
:I'll add the refs back. Many apologies for any insult, similar cases to this occur time to time which is why I became too "precautious" - thanks again for the article. F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑ici 16:31, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Conflict of interest?
Hcrater, I have tagged your article, Two-body Dirac equations, as being unbalanced in that you cite almost exclusively your own work. This is also a sign of a conflict of interest (see the Wikipedia guidelines on conflict of interest). I think it would really help if you provided the missing context, particularly the relationship of this theory to previous theories like that of Breit; and also cite more of the work by other people. RockMagnetist (talk) 19:55, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
Talkback
{{talkback|RockMagnetist|Discussion of Two-body Dirac Equations|ts=22:45, 11 June 2012 (UTC)}}
RockMagnetist (talk) 22:45, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
About interactions....
According to your post on Rockmagnetist's talk page, it seems there was much more to the interactions described by A and S so I'm sorry to bias the equations to QED and not include QCD... =(
If you would like to get used to how wikipedia works first - its better that you keep the article in your sandbox, make continuous refinements, then when its perfected launch it into the mainspace, not while it may still be in development.
Please rewrite my misleading statements on the A and S variables and how they relate to the EM and strong forces (or other quark interactions you meant to say). Thanks and apologies once more, I'll stop interfering and/or irritating also... F = q(E+v×B) ⇄ ∑ici 23:00, 11 June 2012 (UTC)
[[Bargmann-Wigner equations]]?
Hello, and thanks for your contributions, especially two-body Dirac equations.
There is no article on the Bargmann-Wigner equations for particles of any spin. I asked the wikiproject physics group some time ago about this but there was no response (admittedly my post was fairly hyperactive and rude, but I'm different now).
I plan to cobble together in User:Maschen/Bargmann-Wigner equations a few papers and at least generate some start to the article: [http://www.publish.csiro.au/?act=view_file&file_id=PH780137.pdf][http://www.apmaths.uwo.ca/people/QFTNotesAll.pdf][http://aflb.ensmp.fr/AFLB-295/aflb295m307.pdf][http://arxiv.org/pdf/1011.1696v1.pdf][http://arxiv.org/pdf/hep-th/0411090v1.pdf][http://diposit.ub.edu/dspace/bitstream/2445/12327/1/4773.pdf][http://www.znaturforsch.com/aa/v57a/s57a0723.pdf][http://physics.ipm.ac.ir/conferences/icsw07/notes/qassemi.pdf], however I don't know eneogh QFT, nor have/can find any sources of my own which cite these equations (most books I source on WP are from the uni library).
Your expertise in QFT would be really valuable here. Thanks in advance for any/all help! I'd really appreciate it. Maschen (talk) 10:30, 17 August 2012 (UTC)
[[Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Relativistic Center of Mass]]
Nice article, looks very interesting.
If there are articles with similar/overlapping subject matter, don't worry - other articles can be linked to and from your article, possibly content could be transferred between articles as well. "Overlap" is not usually the reason for not having separate articles.
I took the liberty of tidying up a few things, and still in the process. There doesn't appear to be much feedback at the moment, but I think your article could be moved to mainspace.
Thanks, M∧Ŝc2ħεИτlk 09:18, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
By the way, if you don't mind me saying, some of your LaTeX markup is superfluous, using too many curly brackets like this
:
makes the formula hard to read in code.
Also, if desired, you may consider using one/more of {{tl|cite book}}, {{tl|cite article}}, {{tl|cite journal}}, {{tl|cite website}}, which provide a uniform formatting of references throughout an article (the authors, article title, publisher name, journal name, volume number, DOI, issue numbers, ISBN, etc. etc. all appear in the name place). You have already does this by hand, which is fine. Although, I removed the extra curly brackets around the titles, why are they needed? Are they from BibTeX or similar?
Regards, M∧Ŝc2ħεИτlk 09:58, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
::One more thing, editors at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Physics#Submission on relativistic center of mass have recognized your work, and agree it is neutral, well-written, and well-referenced enough to be moved into mainspace. You may want to comment at the link on the article title though, as there are alternative title suggestions. Best, M∧Ŝc2ħεИτlk 19:41, 25 September 2013 (UTC)
Your submission at AfC [[Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/Relativistic_Center_of_Mass|Center of mass (relativistic)]] was accepted
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. {{#if:{{#invoke:IPAddress|isIp|1=Hcrater}}
|You may wish to consider registering an account so you can create articles yourself
|Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer
}}.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider {{leave feedback/link|page=Wikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creation|text=leaving us some feedback}}.
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Relativistic Global Non-Inertial Reference Frames|Draft:Relativistic Global Non-Inertial Reference Frames]] (June 3)
The existing submission may be deleted at any time. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new Articles for creation help desk], or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
:* Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get [http://webchat.freenode.net/?channels=#wikipedia-en-help real-time chat help from experienced editors].
Chris Troutman (talk) 05:41, 3 June 2014 (UTC)
style="margin: 2em 0;" |
style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello! Hcrater,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! |
{{#ifeq:{{NAMESPACE}}|{{ns:3}}|Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC}}