User talk:Ich-Du-De#Airbus aircraft

File:Chocolate chip cookies.jpg]]

Hello, Ich-Du-De, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

• Introduction
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Your first article
• Discover what's going on in the Wikimedia community
• Feel free to make test edits in the sandbox
• and check out the Task Center, for ideas about what to work on.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Tlc|Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Again, welcome! BilCat (talk) 06:15, 12 November 2021 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation

File:Control copyright icon.svg Hello Ich-Du-De! Your additions to :Airbus A380 have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

• You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
• Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
• We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
• If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably-free and compatible copyright license. Such a release must be done in a verifiable manner, so that the authority of the person purporting to release the copyright is evidenced. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
• Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 13:43, 29 December 2021 (UTC)

:Hello Diannaa! Thanks for the copyright warning. But you deleted also a passage not taken from copyrighted BBC, it is from Airbus PR. I have restored the said passage.Ich-Du-De (talk) 05:05, 30 December 2021 (UTC)

:: Even if you take the passage from Airbus PR, it is still copyright violation. You must write it in your own words. OhanaUnited^{Talk page} 03:57, 14 January 2022 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from :McDonnell Douglas MD-80 into :McDonnell Douglas MD-90. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from page name; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{tl|copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. Thank you. — Diannaa (talk) 14:23, 24 July 2022 (UTC)

:Noted! Actually I left a note "Removed the 'derivative' portion (moved to the related article MD-90)" in the edit summary of the source article McDonnell Douglas MD-80, but forgot to make the corresponding attribution "copied content from the article MD-80" to the target article McDonnell Douglas MD-90. Thank you anyway! Ich-Du-De (talk) 03:40, 25 July 2022 (UTC)

Please avoid WP:jargon and WP:Puffery. Thanks.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 07:23, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

: Thanks, but that was not WP:Puffery as the high efficiency (low fuel burn) is expected for "all new" and "last generation" airliner like Airbus A220. So, the Boeing 797 would be more efficient than A220 if built, IMO.Ich-Du-De (talk) 13:53, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

:: Not just your recent edit, but many of your edits employ weasel words similar to the manufacturers marketing materials. You have to be more careful and more factual.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 16:00, 9 February 2023 (UTC)

Again, if you want to read an Airbus brochure, go read it. Here, content is encyclopedic.--Marc Lacoste (talk) 10:02, 14 February 2023 (UTC)