User talk:Inspeximus

Notice: An RFC is being conducted here at Talk:Hard diskdrive#RFC on the use of the IEC prefixes. The debate concerns [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Hard_disk_drive&oldid=423180773#Capacity this table] which includes columns comparing SI and Binary prefixes to describe storage capacity. We welcome your input

You are receiving this message because you are a member of WikiProject Computing --RaptorHunter (talk) 18:35, 10 April 2011 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Guild of Copy Editors/Newsletters/May 2011}} Sent on behalf of the Guild of Copy Editors using AWB on 07:27, 4 May 2011 (UTC)

Image:Copyright-problem.svg

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of :Bourne Society, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.bournesociety.org.uk/bournesoc/about-us.html.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 17:09, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

Image:Copyright-problem.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on :Bourne Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Ramaksoud2000 (talk) 17:12, 19 December 2011 (UTC)

In accordance with the recommendations of WP:COI I declare that I act as webmaster for the Bourne Society and am a member of the Council (governing body) of that organisation. Nevertheless, I aim to preserve a neutral tone in my editing of the article entitled "Bourne Society" and generally to act in accordance with the guidance of WP:COI. In particular, after my initial errors, I have created the article in user space and have sought feedback before publishing the article (see http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Help_desk#Feddback_on_draft_page). I do not regard myself as having any rights of ownership over the article, but merely the originator of a first draft who now welcomes contributions from other editors.

Inspeximus (talk) 08:54, 21 December 2011 (UTC)

Hello,

Analysis of the sources. Please see my detailed answer at Wikipedia:Editor assistance/Requests

• http://www.surreycc.gov.uk/sccwebsite/sccwspages.nsf/LookupWebPagesByTITLE_RTF/Caterham+and+District+Local+History+Centre?opendocumentl# Page not found
• http://www.caterham-independent.co.uk/latest-news/1568-bourne-society-website ONly about the new web site
• http://www.charitycommission.gov.uk/Showcharity/RegisterOfCharities/CharityWithoutPartB.aspx?RegisteredCharityNumber=293109&SubsidiaryNumber=0 Charity comminssion audit - only proves the organisation exists
• http://opencharities.org/charities/293109 - listing, only proves the organisation exists
• http://www.thisissurreytoday.co.uk/History-book-lays-grand-houses-bare/story-11553524-detail/story.html - a book review, not about the organisation
• http://www.thisissurreytoday.co.uk/New-book-honours-fallen-Caterham-soldiers-Great-War/story-11364911-detail/story.html - a book review, not about the organisation
• http://openplaques.org/organisations/bourne_society - possibly a reliable source, but only about the plaques, not about the organisation
• http://www.thisissurreytoday.co.uk/History-store-site-remembered/story-12129338-detail/story.html - about the installation of a plaque, not about tjhe ortganisation
• Other sources are either Primary Sources, or references to the organisation's own publications.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:17, 23 December 2011 (UTC)

Hi. I see nothing eventuated from your proposed merger, though there was no objection in 2010. If you no longer wish to proceed, I'll get on and do it. Cheers, Bjenks (talk) 04:05, 21 August 2012 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=616415269 your edit] to Joey Deacon may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Joey Deacon|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].

:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• life.{{cite web |url=[http://www.workhouses.org.uk/MAB-Caterham/]{{red|]}}|title=The Imbeciles Asylum, Caterham|accessdate=10 July 2014}} He remained in contact with

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:53, 10 July 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Caterham, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page A22. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:27, 11 July 2014 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:Arbitration Committee Elections December 2015/MassMessage}} MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:09, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Inspeximus. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Fittall, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 06:02, 2 April 2022 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC