User talk:Itemsplot

Image:Nuvola apps important.svg A tag has been placed on :Kurt lockhart, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tl|hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. _└^and-rew_┘^┌_talk^┐ 03:41, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

{{{icon|25px }}}Please refrain from introducing inappropriate pages{{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{1|}}}|, such as :{{{1}}},}} to Wikipedia. Doing so is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. {{{{{subst|}}}#if:{{{2|}}}|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}} — Scientizzle 04:29, 17 November 2007 (UTC)

Image:Nuvola apps important.svg A tag has been placed on :Central Presbyterian Church of Waco requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a company or corporation, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for companies and corporations.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{tl|hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. – Mike.lifeguard | ^@en.wb 03:43, 20 November 2007 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|1=I am trying to create useful articles, I don't know why I was blocked|decline=Well, once you read the comments and guidelines listed above and understand, please feel free to request another unblock. — Yamla (talk) 19:47, 22 November 2007 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|1=I have read the comments and guidelines above and understand. Central Presbyterian Church is a notable organization and its Wikipedia article should not have been deleted.|decline=You clearly have not read and understood the guidelines or you would know that the notability of the Church was not established in the article as per the notability guidelines. — Yamla (talk) 20:46, 23 November 2007 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|1=If bacon is "notable", a over 100 member church is.|decline=No, it isn't. And you have used your last strike. — Jeffrey O. Gustafson - Shazaam! - <*> 00:13, 24 November 2007 (UTC)}}