User talk:JakobSteenberg/Archives/1

Dear Jakob,

I will create redirects later this day regarding the nomenclatorial changes I have made in some articles (editing with an iPad is not that easy at all). By the way, I try to make multiple redirects as you have seen, that take into account multiple versions and guidelines of the Nomina Anatomica, Nomina Histologica, Nomina Embryologica, and the Terminologia Anatomica and Terminologia Histologica. And the orthography changes all the time, e.g. anulus->annulus->anulus, oesophagus->esophagus->oesophagus,aquaeductus->aqueductus->aquaeductus(in TH or Terminologia Embryologica). And of course the textbooks and atlases that use corrected forms, e.g. glandula parotis. By the way, by categorizing these redirects, they are beautifully alphabetically ordered on the category:stub-class page. Thanks for the good work, with kind regards, Wimpus (talk) 08:53, 15 June 2013 (UTC)

:Dear Jakob, I have made a start with the redirects. Tomorrow more redirects. With kind regards, Wimpus (talk) 21:06, 17 June 2013 (UTC)

::I have to do a lot more redirects. By the way, thank you for the redirect of discus proliger. You can find that form on google books. In Latin there are a few endings that loses the -us for the masculine form of the adjective, e.g. -fer, -ger. With kind regards, Wimpus (talk) 20:53, 18 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Oval window, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Tympanum (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:56, 22 June 2013 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Posterior septal branches of sphenopalatine artery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Ethmoidal arteries (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:10, 2 July 2013 (UTC)

In reference to your addition for sciatic nerve. The jewish population constitutes less than 0.2% of the world population. And of that tiny group, a vast majority of jewish people do not keep kosher. So you have entered a cultural reference that is very obscure. It is also based on religious dietary restrictions, which should be kept to a separate page.

While interesting to some, there are plenty of better venues to discuss Jewish Law than on an anatomy page. And in reference to your assertion that this is not an anatomy page, I disagree. The vast majority of data on this page is factual anatomic information. Please refrain from adding unneeded material.

The sciatic nerve entry is a page within the Category: Nerves of the lower limb and lower torso. And this is a subset of Category:Lower limb anatomy. So this page is in an Anatomy section.

There is a separate entry for sciatic nerve associated with Jewish Law. A link to this page has been added under See Also.

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Carpal tunnel, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palm (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 24 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jakob,

I ask for some advice regarding a potential COI with a user who has been making many edits to head and neck anatomy pages, but from the same source. Please see User_talk:PeggyDoll#Fehrenbach. Thanks, Lesion (talk) 11:15, 30 July 2013 (UTC)

:Thanks for getting back to me. I will try to follow your good advice in future, always to remember that what seems like a problem editor initially may turn into a good editor ... assume good faith as always I suppose. Anyway, the user in question is now not using the same source, but using a variety of sources. I have not reverted any edit they have done, they all appear to be constructive, apart from small things which appear to be accidental such as removing infoboxes... possibly due to visual editor bugs, who knows. By the way, congratulations on the semester abroad, sounds great. Lesion (talk) 02:37, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=568423686 your edit] to Pectineus muscle may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just [{{fullurl:Pectineus muscle|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20-%20{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].

:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• Origin = Pectineal line of the{{red|]]}} pubic bone |

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 22:46, 13 August 2013 (UTC)

File:Merge-arrows.svg An article that you have been involved in editing, Superciliary arches, has been proposed for a merge with another article. If you are interested in the merge discussion, please participate by going here, and adding your comments on the discussion page. Thank you. Petter Bøckman (talk) 13:25, 11 December 2013 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy/Quarterly updates/1}}

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=596082825 your edit] to Sphenoparietal suture may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just [{{fullurl:Sphenoparietal suture|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+typo+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3ABracketBot%7CBracketBot%5D%5D}} edit the page] again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/BBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/BBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=BracketBot%20–%20{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new my operator's talk page].

:List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• }{{red|}}}

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 21:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)

Thanks for the bling. It it always nice when people notice and appreciate what you do. Thanks. Kind regards JakobSteenberg (talk) 09:14, 28 February 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Knee, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vastus (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 16 March 2014 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy/Quarterly updates/2}}

Delivered on behalf of WikiProject Anatomy by User:Mdann52, using MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 07:35, 31 March 2014 (UTC)

Hi Jakob, I forgot to create new redirects after altering the Latin terms in the infobox. Currently I have listed in the etymology part of sternum, xiphoid process, thyroid cartilage and thyroid numerous Latin and English synonyms. How many Latin (and Englis) terms do we have to include in the anatomy infobox? Thank you for your response, with kind regards, Wimpus (talk) 22:37, 9 April 2014 (UTC)

:Category:Hip bone, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mschamberlain (talk) 18:04, 12 April 2014 (UTC)

File:Descriptive Zoopraxography Athlete, Running Long Jump Animated 13.gif gives us an understanding of how and why things in the field of medicine happen. Together, let us jumpstart the project and get it going. Our energy is all it needs.]]

Based on the long felt gap for categorization and improvization of WP:MED articles relating to the field of physiology, the new WikiProject Physiology has been created. WikiProject Physiology is still in its infancy and needs your help. On behalf of a group of editors striving to improve the quality of physiology articles here on Wikipedia, I would like to invite you to come on board and participate in the betterment of physiology related articles. Help us to jumpstart this WikiProject.

• Feel free to leave us a message at any time on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page. If you are interested in joining the project yourself, there is a participant list where you can sign up. Please leave a message on the talk page if you have any problems, suggestions, would like review of an article, need suggestions for articles to edit, or would like some collaboration when editing!
• You can tag the talk pages of relevant articles with {{WikiProject Physiology|class=|importance=}} with your assessment of the article class and importance alongwith. Please note that WP:Physiology, WP:Physio, WP:Phy can be used interchangeably.
• You will make a big difference to the quality of information by adding reliable sources. Sourcing physiology articles is essential and makes a big difference to the quality of articles. And, while you're at it, why not use a book to source information, which can source multiple articles at once!
• We try and use a standard way of arranging the content in each article. That layout is here. These headings let us have a standard way of presenting the information in anatomical articles, indicate what information may have been forgotten, and save angst when trying to decide how to organise an article. That said, this might not suit every article. If in doubt, be bold!
• Why not try and strive to create a good article! Physiology related articles are often small in scope, have available sources, and only a limited amount of research available that is readily presentable!
• Your contributions to the WikiProject page, related categories and templates is also welcome.
• To invite other editors to this WikiProject, copy and past this template (with the signature):
• {{tlsx|WP Physiology–invite}} ~~~~
• To welcome editors of physiology articles, copy and past this template (with the signature):
• {{tlsx|WP Physiology–welcome}} ~~~~
• You can feel free to contact us on the WikiProkect Physiology talk page if you have any problems, or wish to join us. You can also put your suggestions there and discuss the scope of participation.

Hoping for your cooperation! Diptanshu^Talk 12:20, 27 April 2014 (UTC)

The first edition of The Pulse has been released. The Pulse will be a regular newsletter documenting the goings-on at WPMED, including ongoing collaborations, discussions, articles, and each edition will have a special focus. That newsletter is here.

The newsletter has been sent to the talk pages of WP:MED members bearing the {{tl|User WPMed}} template. To opt-out, please leave a message here or simply remove your name from the mailing list. Because this is the first issue, we are still finding out feet. Things like the layout and content may change in subsequent editions. Please let us know what you think, and if you have any ideas for the future, by leaving a message here.

{{small|Posted by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 03:24, 5 June 2014 (UTC) on behalf of WikiProject Medicine.}}

Neat news: BMJ is offering 25 free, full-access accounts to their prestigious medical journal through The Wikipedia Library and Wiki Project Med Foundation (like we did with Cochrane). Please sign up this week: Wikipedia:BMJ --Cheers, Ocaasi via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:14, 10 June 2014 (UTC)

File:Medical translation.svg

File:Stetho book.jpg

sign up for monthly delivery

File:Ebola virus virion.jpg

During August we have translated Disease and it is now live in more than 60 different languages! To help us focus on African languages [https://rubric.com/ Rubric] has donated a large number of articles in languages we haven't previously reached–so a shout out them, and Ian Henderson from Rubric who's joined us here at Wikipedia. We're very happy for our continued collaboration with both Rubric and Translators without Borders!

:Just some of our over 60 translations:

• Xhosa
• Northern Sotho
• Zulu
• Tsonga
• Venda
• Hausa
• Igbo
• Yoruba
• Kinyarwanda
• Swahili
• Tigrinya

;New roles and guides!

At Wikimania there were so many enthusiastic people jumping at the chance to help out the Medical Translation Project, but unfortunately not all of them knew how to get started. That is why we've been spending considerable time writing and improving guides! They are finally live, and you can find them at our home-page!

;New sign up page!

We're proud to announce a new sign up page at WP:MTSIGNUP! The old page was getting cluttered and didn't allow you to speficy a role. The new page should be easier to sign up to, and easier to navigate so that we can reach you when you're needed!

;Style guides for translations

Translations are of both full articles and shorter articles continues. The process where short articles are chosen for translation hasn't been fully transparent. In the coming months we hope to have a first guide, so that anyone who writes medical or health articles knows how to get their articles to a standard where they can be translated! That's why we're currently working on medical good lede criteria! The idea is to have a similar peer review process to good article nominations, but only for ledes.

;Some more stats

• In July, 18 full article translations went live (WP:RTT), and an additional 6 simplified versions went live (WP:RTTS)!
• We have a number of new lead integrators into Dutch, Polish, Arabic and Bulgarian, with more to come in smaller languages! (Find them here old sign up page)
• We were mentioned in a Global Voices Online report by Subhashish Panigrahi at [http://globalvoicesonline.org/2014/07/27/doctors-and-translators-are-working-together-to-bridge-wikipedias-medical-language-gap/# Doctors and translators are working together to bridge Wikipedia's medical language gap]
• New medical professionals have started, dedicated to working in Odiya and Kinyarwanda!

;Further reading

• [http://translatorswithoutborders.org/ Translators Without Borders]
• [http://www.hifa2015.org/ Healthcare information for all by 2015], a global campaign

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy/Quarterly updates/3}}

Hi, I'm SBaker43. JakobSteenberg, thanks for creating Simplified Airway Risk Index!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. This topic needs links from related topics; Thyromental distance and Mallampati score are obvious articles. There should be others in the EMS area.

Thanks for adding this.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. SBaker43 (talk) 06:26, 17 November 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Blind insertion airway device, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aspiration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:36, 19 December 2014 (UTC)

When you split content into sub articles please indicate in the edit summary where it came from. Best Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 09:30, 23 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

:Basic airway management

::added a link pointing to Aspiration

:Osteoblast

::added a link pointing to Nuclei

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 26 December 2014 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Basic airway management, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Aspiration. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:35, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Long posterior ciliary arteries, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Iris. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 10 January 2015 (UTC)

Image:Ambox warning pn.svg

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of :Dorsal digital arteries of hand, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: :Dorsal digital arteries. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:12, 16 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Antvorskov barrack, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Barrack. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:55, 17 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi there. I've noticed you creating a lot of medical/anatomical disambiguation (dab) pages for what seem to be partial title matches or search indexes. For instance, Branchial Buccopharyngeal and Proper artery. I wonder if a dab page (as opposed to a glossary, index, etc) is the best way to do this: e.g. is a Branchial membrane actually ever referred to as a "Branchial", or merely informally, when it's already been established that one is referring to membrane? We don't normally make dab pages for everything that follows a given adjective. If this series of dab pages has already been discussed and okayed by WikiProject Anatomy or WikiProject Medicine then I'm satisfied, but just wanted to make sure your page creations are in line with guidelines, with some oversight by other experts, to ensure that they serve the most good with the least amount of confusion. Cheers, --Animalparty-- (talk) 03:03, 20 February 2015 (UTC)

Hello, I notice that you're creating a lot of new disambiguation pages. As a new page patroller, it would be helpful if you would get WP:Autopatrolled rights at Wikipedia:Requests for permissions/Autopatrolled so that they don't all come up as unpatrolled pages at Special:NewPages. Thanks,  Liam987(talk) 00:29, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

:I'll nominate you for it, if you don't object. Didn't mean to sound like I was trying to give you more things to do, in case it came off that way.  Liam987(talk) 00:39, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

::I'll give your current project as rationale, then. I'm sure the 50 non-disambiguation thing isn't absolute. Liam987(talk) 00:52, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

:::I've nominated you.  Liam987(talk) 01:01, 19 February 2015 (UTC)

::::FYI, I've [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:Log&action=view&type=rights&page=User:JakobSteenberg approved] the request at permissions, so you are now autopatrolled. This feature will have no effect on your editing and is simply intended to reduce the workload on new page patrollers. For more information on the patroller right, see Wikipedia:Autopatrolled. Keep editing! Swarm ^X 22:51, 23 February 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Metatarsal ligaments, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi, I'm Kudpung. I wanted to let you know that I saw the page you reviewed, Longitudinal fasciculus, and have un-reviewed it again. If you have any questions, please ask them on my talk page. Thank you. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 05:26, 15 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited First dorsal metatarsal artery, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Interosseous dorsalis muscle. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)

{{DYKM|box3|text=Hello, JakobSteenberg. Continuous Liquid Interface Production, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated for {{DYK blue}} consideration to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 16:21, 24 March 2015 (UTC)}}

Jakob

Your kind response and suggestions were really helpful. I really thought editing would be simple, but the wikipedia syntax is very convoluted and not intutitive. But I have gotten through most of the Help pages and have a pretty good idea now of at least how to do basic editing. Many of the references cited in the articles are really not the best. So I hope to improve that among other tasks. And someone posted a long list of anatomy articles that need editing so I am working on the first, common flexor tendon. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anatomyczar (talk • contribs) 11:55, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Jakob:

I have just edited the page for "common flexor tendon." I am confused about references. I added a reference but it is coming up as a window rather than within a reference section. Is this correct. Also how does the text seem? And I should have an image that actually shows the common flexor tendon. I am working on that.

Also, now that there is a reference how do I eliminate the icon that says the article needs a reference. Thanks. Joel Anatomyczar (talk) 14:38, 25 March 2015 (UTC)Anatomyczar

Jakob:

I see now what was needed to make the reference section work. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anatomyczar (talk • contribs) 16:22, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Jakob: I of course will change the singular/plural material but I am not sure I really understand what you are doing. Please give me a page where you have made the changes so I can see what you have done. And I certainly did notice that you did some additional work on the common flexor tendon page. I am still working on a better image for that page. Also will work on the infobox. thanks. Anatomyczar (talk) 21:44, 25 March 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

:Abductor digiti minimi muscle of hand

::added links pointing to Palm, Palmar, Medial and Ulnar

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Jakob:

I understand now in concept what you are doing. It will take me a bit of time to put it into practice. And thanks for saying that editing Wikipedia is not easy. I am fairly computer literate and I found editing very confusing. Fortunately, I had some exposure to HTML years ago so at least I have some idea of what is going on. But for someone with no prior exposure, editing would be very confusing. So I have plenty to do in my retirement.

I just got a great image for common flexor tendon. I will label it and figure out how to insert it and remove the old Gray's anatomy image.

JoelAnatomyczar (talk) 11:37, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Jakob: Firstly, that infobox seems more for muscles than for this tendon. See if you agree. More importantly, I have a new and much better image to insert but I don't see where the code is for the images on the current page. I want to delete the gray's image and put in mine. Also I took a look at the upper limb template at the bottom of the page. It is really confusing and has errors and terms that are not used. Should I fix it and if so how? Where do I find it? I now see how working on these pages is infinite. Thanks. JoelAnatomyczar (talk) 20:15, 26 March 2015 (UTC)

Jakob:

I do understand about loading images and copyright. Let me play with getting the mages onto the page and then I may have some more questions! Thanks. JoelAnatomyczar (talk) 15:28, 27 March 2015 (UTC)

Jakob:

I put a new image on the common flexor tendon page. I think I am done with this one for now and will likely do common extensor tendon next and then move on to some more complicated pages.Anatomyczar (talk) 13:25, 30 March 2015 (UTC)

JakobSteenberg, I am sorry to have offended you. My intentions are not to spam nor to adversely affect "listing at Google." My intention is to add references to a resource with no banner ads or space filled with supplement/steroid/Viagra promotions. From my perspective, these Wikipedia articles, especially the articles on specific exercises lack at times good quality before/after photos and detailed videos that may assist someone exploring these exercises. With that being said, I will not add these references in the future to the muscle group pages. I can see that some individuals may find it helpful and some may not based on the parent guidelines of these articles. Does Wikipedia provide any guidelines for this purpose?

While I am sure you deal with many spammers, I would ask you to please provide others that you talk to for the first time with a little more professional than you afforded me. I personally felt very threatened by your email, and I do not think that your salutation of "kinds regards" is appropriate for a letter with such a tone. In the article you provided me the guidelines for the first email read as follows:

"Hello, I'm UserName. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you.

As I said, please respond and let's have an open discussion. If you still believe that the external links are inappropriate for the muscle groups please let me know, and I will take them down. No need for you to spend your time taking them down. Also, if you need someone else to weigh in on this issue, please reach out to an appropriate Wikipedia editor. I'm not familiar enough with the community.

Best,

Kevin — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevinpmcgowan (talk • contribs) 00:08, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Thanks for the response. I appreciate your tone this time. I agree, based on the guidelines of the WikiAnatomy project, the links in the anatomy are not appropriate.

However, I am quite discouraged by this process. During our conversation User:CFCF removed every single link that I contributed. Again, I would have been perfectly willing to remove these myself. My problem with the exercise contributions is external links to t-nation and other sites (supplement/pseudosteroid sites still exist) but all links to site with no ads/supplements/steroids is removed. The editor process is important. An editor should be able to remove spam, but again contact that individual and ask whether that person really cares about the topic or is trying to make a big buck. Right now, it just looks like CFCF is trying to be a vigilante by removing all links without any discussion while leaving much more questionable links. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Kevinpmcgowan (talk • contribs) 13:28, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Rest assured I will not add any more external links nor will I interfere with any of your efforts. My intent was never to interfere with this community. I appreciate the quality discussion that this has turned into. After reading through the long-list of rules, I do believe you were justified in asking for these links to be removed. With that being said, I am discouraged that the enforcers of these rules at times fail to follow their own prescribed rules during enforcement. I am also discouraged that the rules were selectively enforced on me but not similar links. The same moderation should be taken with all links on these pages. After all, I used these initial links as proxy for what was or was not appropriate for these exercise articles. With that I sign off wikipedia. Good luck with your studies. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 45.37.112.40 (talk) 23:11, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Jakob, thanks for the support. I have to do a little more on common extensor tendon and then will work on gluteal muscles. You are correct. The article needs work and should be fun to do. JoelAnatomyczar (talk) 11:17, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

{{tmbox

|type = notice

|image = Image:Updated DYK query.svg

|text = On 31 March 2015, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Continuous Liquid Interface Production, which you recently created or substantially expanded. {{#if: |The nomination discussion and review may be seen at .|{{#ifexist:Template:Did you know nominations/Continuous Liquid Interface Production|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Continuous Liquid Interface Production.|{{#ifexist:Template talk:Did you know/Continuous Liquid Interface Production|The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template talk:Did you know/Continuous Liquid Interface Production.}} }} }} You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, [https://tools.wmflabs.org/wikiviewstats/index.php?page=Continuous_Liquid_Interface_Production&datefrom=2015-03-01&dateto=2015-03-31 live views], [http://stats.grok.se/en/201503/Continuous_Liquid_Interface_Production daily totals]), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

}} Allen3 ^talk 12:05, 31 March 2015 (UTC)

Jakob: I spent time on the gluteal muscles article today (just reading it). It is basically wrong and pretty useless. Much of the discussion pertains to the gluteus region and not the gluteal muscles. The fat layer that is referred to, panicles adiposa, is not found in humans. Honestly, I am not sure why an article on gluteal muscles would need anymore than a single sentence stating the three gluteal muscles with redirects to them. Not sure how to proceed here. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anatomyczar (talk • contribs) 13:31, 1 April 2015 (UTC)

Jakob: I really appreciate your comments. I will work on the page. Currently working on the extensor compartments of wrist page. This one is very straightforward but needed some minor corrections, editing and some images.Anatomyczar (talk) 12:52, 2 April 2015 (UTC)

Image:Copyright-problem.svg

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of :Femoral-tibial angle, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://what-is-this.net/en/define/femur.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 12:37, 5 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mylohyoid muscle, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CT and Median raphe. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 6 April 2015 (UTC)

Jakob:

I have been asked to write an editorial on Anatomy and Wikipedia for the journal Clinical Anatomy. I am almost done with it but because I am so new at this I could really use an experienced Wiki editor to check it. Would you be willing to do that. If so, please email me directly at vilensk@ipfw.edu. Thanks. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anatomyczar (talk • contribs) 14:13, 8 April 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Epigastric vessels, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Epigastric arteries and Epigastric veins. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:25, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm ReferenceBot. I have automatically detected that an edit performed by you may have introduced errors in referencing. {{#ifeq:1|1|It is|They are}} as follows:

• On the :Reproductive system page, [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=665459560 your edit] caused a broken reference name (help). ([{{fullurl:Reproductive system|action=edit&minor=minor&summary=Fixing+reference+error+raised+by+%5B%5BUser%3AReferenceBot%7CReferenceBot%5D%5D}} Fix] | [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&preload=User:ReferenceBot/helpform&preloadtitle=Referencing%20errors%20on%20%5B%5BSpecial%3ADiff%2F665459560%7C{{Replace|Reproductive system| |%20}}%5D%5D Ask for help])

Please check this page and fix the errors highlighted. If you think this is a false positive, you can [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?action=edit&preload=User:A930913/RBpreload&editintro=User:A930913/RBeditintro&minor=&title=User_talk:A930913&preloadtitle=ReferenceBot%20–%20{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}§ion=new report it to my operator].

Thanks, ReferenceBot (talk) 00:26, 5 June 2015 (UTC)

Jakob, thank you for your kind words at wt:med. Glad you appreciate the spirit of my input. I'm very sympathetic with both your intentions and your situation. If it's ok with you I'd like to continue to respond with a few suggestions on the wt:med thread (maybe after an arbitrary break?), because I think it's really good to have these sorts of conversations there. Kudos to you for going there! 5.80.198.100 (talk) 11:02, 29 June 2015 (UTC) [a long-term (logged-out) ip user]

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy/Quarterly updates/4}}

Delivered by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:25, 29 June 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Muscles of the hand, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Fingers and Pointing. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:20, 12 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

:Large intestine

::added a link pointing to Iliac artery

:Muscles of the hand

::added a link pointing to Fingers

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:38, 19 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi JakobSteenberg. I noticed that you created the page Cutaneous nerves of thighs as a redirect to itself. I assume this was unintentional, so I'm letting you know so that you can edit the page to redirect wherever it was supposed to. Thank you! —Granger (talk · contribs) 00:49, 26 September 2015 (UTC)

Just to ask why you did delete my part in the Article in: Foreign body In Veterinary medicine often Endoscopy method is not the prefered one for foreign body.

So the small hartmann is produced up to 1 m to extract foreign bodies. You do it under radiology control. Maybee you decide to refert back or like to give me arguments. regards--Arztde (talk) 03:26, 1 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:56, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Crus fracture, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Crus. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:07, 23 January 2016 (UTC)

It's not a Talk page.Xx236 (talk) 09:54, 1 February 2016 (UTC)

Image:Copyright-problem.svg

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of :Pectinate, and it appears to include material copied directly from http://www.dictionary30.com/meaning/Pectinate.

It is possible that the bot was mistaken and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. The article will be reviewed to determine if there are any copyright issues.

If substantial content is duplicated and it is not public domain or available under a compatible license, it will be deleted. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material. You may use such publications as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details. (If you own the copyright to the previously published content and wish to donate it, see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for the procedure.) CorenSearchBot (talk) 00:30, 15 February 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Root canal, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CT and Molar. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:13, 26 February 2016 (UTC)

Image:Information icon4.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on :Tactile perceptions requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IagoQnsi (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Image:Information icon4.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on :Tactile perception requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. IagoQnsi (talk) 17:13, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

• Hi. I deleted these two because you put a WikiProject banner on the article page, not the talk page, and there was nothing else there. I'm not sure what you intended, but by all means start again. Regards, JohnCD (talk) 17:40, 11 March 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Fascia iliaca block, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Aspiration, Cranial and Lateral cutaneous nerve. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 16:37, 27 April 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Biceps femoris muscle, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Sprinting. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:59, 28 May 2016 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vasti, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Lateral intermuscular septum. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 26 June 2016 (UTC)

Hi JakobSteenberg thanks for your message about changing talk pages etc. I thought (think) that this was done by administrators and I just tried to install it and was told it was used by admins. ? Also I thought it gave those 'more in the know' a chance to overturn any. (I don't usually do that many changes at once). Thanks --Iztwoz (talk) 11:40, 12 July 2016 (UTC)

hello dear I want to talk with you about this edit I edit one link for helping users for searching about appendix so I edit this link appendix this link for users helping for appendix issue so can you tell me why you delete this edit link? thank you... — Preceding unsigned comment added by Zubi12 (talk • contribs) 19:45, 9 September 2016 (UTC)

Hello,

I have a new micro technology to deal with the cells and making new tissue with a specific guidelines, my idea work with the architecture to build small building for cells and to make small human unit able to all experiments and cam try new drugs with full freedom. So please contact me and give me your email address to more details....

Ali Massoud

Medical School of OIU

ali.hhh.massoud@gmail.com

Ali Massoud (talk) 22:01, 21 October 2016 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy/Newsletter/5}}

Message delivered on behalf of WikiProject Anatomy by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:21, 13 November 2016 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, JakobSteenberg. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

:Condensing osteitis

::added links pointing to Immunity, Sclerotic and Pulp

:Central odontogenic fibroma

::added a link pointing to Stroma

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:21, 27 March 2017 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Alar plate, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Caudal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:14, 21 April 2017 (UTC)

Hi, Thank you so much for all your work rating articles! Just in case it is useful, I think that enzyme articles (basically anything ending in '-ase') don't need to be in WP:CHEMS. Thanks again! T.Shafee(Evo&Evo)^talk 06:15, 17 June 2017 (UTC)

Image:Copyright-problem.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on :Neer classification requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. This page appears to be a direct copy from https://radiopaedia.org/articles/neer-classification-of-proximal-humeral-fractures-1. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 12:40, 20 October 2017 (UTC)

Firstly, thank you for rating so many of our anatomy articles. This is really helpful! (I alone use this ever 1-2 days)...

I have been having a look at our categorisation by field (specifically :Category:Anatomy articles about systems) and have realised that most of the entries are redirects. I think the most useful way we can use our interproject field is to only list articles. The idea being that a WikiProject anatomy editor who is interested in, say, microanatomy can pull up straight away a list of relevant articles they can edit. I find (could just be me) that having lots of redirects is fairly messy and takes up some time when one is trying to work out which are the editable articles. What do you think about this idea? (as in - fields just for articles)? --Tom (LT) (talk) 22:59, 19 November 2017 (UTC)

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

{{Ivmbox|Hello, JakobSteenberg. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy/Newsletter/6}}

{{Ivmbox|Hello, JakobSteenberg. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

{| style="position: relative; margin-left: 2em; margin-right: 2em; padding: 0.5em 1em; background-color:Cornsilk; border: 2px solid #bddff2; border-color: rgba( 109, 193, 240, 0.75 ); border-radius: 8px; box-shadow: 8px 8px 12px rgba( 0, 0, 0, 0.7 );"

| Newsletter Nr 6, 2018-12-25, for WikiProject Genealogy (and Wikimedia genealogy project on Meta)

Participation:

This is the sixth newsletter sent by mass mail to members in Wikipedia:WikiProject Genealogy, to everyone who voted a support for establishing a potential Wikimedia genealogy project on meta, and anyone who during the years showed an interest in genealogy on talk pages and likewise.

(To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please see below)

At 3 December 2018, the [https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikimedia_genealogy_project#Support list of users who support the potential Wikimedia genealogy project], reached 100!

You can already now try out the demo for a genealogy wiki at https://tools.wmflabs.org/genealogy/wiki/Main_Page and try out the functions. You will find parts of the 18th Pharao dynasty and other records submitted by the 7 first users, and it would be great if you would add some records.

And with those great news we want to wish you a creative New Year 2019!

Don't want newsletters? If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, please remove yourself from the mailing list or alternatively to opt-out of all massmessage mailings, you may add :Category:Opted-out of message delivery to your user talk page.

Cheers from your WikiProject Genealogy coordinator {{noping|Dan Koehl}}.

{{center

| To discontinue receiving Project Genealogy newsletters, please remove your name from our mailing list.
Newsletter delivered by MediaWiki message delivery

}}

|}

File:Wiki Project Med Foundation logo.svg

You have been a member of Wiki Project Med Foundation (WPMEDF) in the past. Your membership, however, appears to have expired. As such this is a friendly reminder encouraging you to officially rejoin WPMEDF. There are no associated costs. Membership gives you the right to vote in elections for the board. The current membership round ends in 2020.

Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk) 05:34, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

File:Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Uncinate processes of pancreases. Since you had some involvement with the Uncinate processes of pancreases redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Tom (LT) (talk) 23:49, 15 February 2020 (UTC)

File:Information.svg

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirects Xander's ligament and Xander's ligaments. Since you had some involvement with the Xander's ligament redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. gobonobo ^{+ c} 20:41, 21 April 2020 (UTC)

{{Wikipedia:WikiProject Anatomy/Newsletter/7}}

File:Wiki Project Med Foundation logo.svg

You have been a member of Wiki Project Med Foundation (WPMEDF) in the past. Your membership, however, appears to have expired. As such this is a friendly reminder encouraging you to officially rejoin WPMEDF. There are no associated costs. Membership gives you the right to vote in elections for the board. The current membership round ends in 2022.

Thanks again :-) The team at Wiki Project Med Foundation---Avicenno (talk), 2021.01