User talk:JamesLockson

Welcome!

Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions{{#if:|, especially what you did for :{{{art}}}}}. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on {{#if:Literaturegeek|my talk page|my talk page}}, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome!

Literaturegeek | T@1k? 13:14, 19 January 2009 (UTC)

I've left a message you might want to look at: Talk:Fluoroquinolone_toxicity_syndrome#NPOV_and_neologism_issues. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 15:13, 15 February 2009 (UTC)

:Please don't re-add the external links to quinolone toxicity advocacy sites to the article. It violates WP:NPOV. Thank you. --Steven Fruitsmaak (Reply) 18:37, 16 February 2009 (UTC)

You have made some disruptive changes at fluorquinolone toxicity please stop.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:25, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

You have removed a number of good faith edits without justification. I have provided lots of reasons. Much of what is there is unreferenced as it is untrue. Therefore I have removed it.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 10:42, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

My justifications are on the talk page. Goldfrank's toxicology is the TEXTBOOK of the medical field of toxicology. Holds some weight. We will work with co tracts until enough people from WP:MED get involved to give use a consensus.

I do not consider case studies to be suitable references. We need to state how common these adverse reactions are with hard numbers. They are out there and I started adding some which you removed.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:00, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

::The page you refernce is NOT sufficient for wikipedia.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:02, 19 February 2009 (UTC)

Thanks and I have left him a note. We can now see what the WP community decides.--Doc James (talk · contribs · email) 11:16, 19 February 2009 (UTC)