User talk:Jan Arkesteijn

Thanks for your message I started a thread here: [http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Vincent_van_Gogh#Picture_of_Theo] and I placed the image on Theo van Gogh. I left the message for you on the discussion in Commons, I don't think it should be deleted, just a file name change. Thanks..Modernist (talk) 13:20, 15 January 2009 (UTC)

After some searching, I have come to the conclusion that the burial in the Noorderkerk is unlikely. Bartelds didn't mention it in his Afasmit (talk) 22:43, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

:Thank you, Afasmit, I will remove it on the Dutch wikipedia as well. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 22:51, 14 May 2009 (UTC)

I will not re-revert if you re-delete "When Pablo Picasso was shown this photograph on January 6, 1958 he remarked: What a striking resemblance to the young Rimbaud, especially the keen and penetrating eyes." Anomalocaris (talk) 07:25, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

:Thank you. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 08:01, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

::I included the Marc Edo Tralbaut quote initially, because I found it to be charming and interesting that Picasso would even make the connection between the two...Modernist (talk) 11:53, 16 July 2009 (UTC)

:::I know, but it is a writer's trick to add volume to a book. But it really means nothing. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 07:22, 17 July 2009 (UTC)

Hello, {{BASEPAGENAME}}. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at WP:ANI regarding your edits/behaviour in Global Consciousness Project. {{#if:|The thread is {{{thread}}}. }}{{#if:|The discussion is about the topic :{{{1}}}.}} Thank you.. Logos5557 (talk) 00:30, 28 September 2009 (UTC)

Bear with me. I figured out what happened. There are two totally different ways of interpreting this sentece: the way I perceived it was that the game was basically a driving contest and the players would get a couple dozen golf balls and try to get more balls than their opponent into a target. the way you interpreted it ( and the way it was meant to be interpreted) was that the game was more like golf in which the players tried to get the ball to the target in the least number of strokes.username 1 (talk) 15:08, 14 December 2009 (UTC)

{{tb|OrangeDog|File:Scotland-Staffa-Fingals-Cave-1900.jpg}}

Just to let you know I have cleaned up and copyedited the Zenú article per your request at WP:PNT. I think in some places the article, which was very interesting, may need more citations/references, but I haven't tagged it for that. Textorus (talk) 20:20, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

:Thanks. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 21:13, 29 March 2011 (UTC)

In the article Lucia Elizabeth Vestris you have substituted a new image of the singer in women’s clothes fot the previous one en travesti. The caption still reads: “Engraving: Eliza Vestris in The Alcaid”. Since the part performed in that opera was the breeches role of Felix, there is an apparent inconsistency (probably you just forgot to correct the caption). I wish, however, to call your attention to the fact that an image en travesti might turn out to be more significant of Madame Vestris’ operatic career than an ordinary female one. Excuse my Italianate English. Cheers.--Jeanambr (talk) 12:33, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

:You are quite right, I forgot to adjust the caption. My only consideration for changing the image is that the facial structure in the previous picture is very general, and I doubt whether it honoustly represents Lucia Vestris, since there is no source. The new picture is somewhat better, although we will not know whether it is a true representation of her untill we find a detailed portrait painting. I leave it up to you to change the caption or to revert the image. I will not interfere. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:50, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

:There might also be the option to add the image in the text where The Alcaid is addressed. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:58, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

::Thanks. --Jeanambr (talk) 16:43, 28 October 2011 (UTC)

I'd have hoped that the University of Toronto would improve that article, but saw little sign of that. You then did the work to it that I should have done. Thank you!

It seems to be part of this, which has an alarmingly long list of articles being worked on by students at the University of Toronto. Feeling rather guilty about the way my hesitation in Photo manipulation had led to more work for you, I chose Ray-Ban more or less at random.

In a word, [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Ray-Ban&offset=&limit=100&action=history ugh].

Granted, there's probably not much to say about some sunglass brand, but presumably the students chose this for themselves.

Anyway, I wonder whether the bigger picture needs to be brought up on some discussion board. -- Hoary (talk) 02:18, 30 March 2012 (UTC)

Hello! Thank you for uploading a bigger image version of the Chaplin image [http://commons.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Charlie_chaplin_karno_portrait.jpg here]. I'm afraid I may have to revert it though - it is not exactly the same as the image from the source (ie, [http://chaplin.bfi.org.uk/resources/bfi/biog/biog_large.php?fid=biog3&enlargement=bfi-00n-h97.jpg here]), and that source gives a specific date and place of publication (which is important to prove it is definitely public domain). It also doesn't have markings over it! I think the resolution in the original version was of sufficient quality, so is it okay to revert back? --Lobo (talk) 16:27, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

:It is the same photograph. No doubt about that. So, if the source info applies to your photo it applies to this photo as well. Or the other way around, if it does not apply to this photo, it does not apply to your upload either.Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 17:47, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

::Well I'm not entirely sure, because on the file page I'm explicitly claiming that the image was published in Picture Show magazine (and this is very important, because the img is only PD if it was published before 1923)...that's why I feel more comfortable using that image, rather than one that clearly wasn't in a magazine. My eventual goal for the article is WP:FAC, where images are carefully scrutinised. That's why I kind of don't want to risk it...especially since the original was decent anyway. Does that makes sense? Sorry, I don't mean to be ungrateful or difficult. Perhaps you could upload your version as a different file? By the way, I reverted the image because you hadn't replied and I was in the process of updating the page, and then I came here and saw that you had since replied! I wasn't just reverting despite what you had said. --Lobo (talk) 19:33, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

:::Does it make sense, you ask. The only thing I am trying to make clear is, that these two images are unquestionably the same, they have a common source. It can't be anything else than the picture the photographer took at the Witzel Studios in LA. So the information you refer to that proofs it is in the public domain is just as valid for my upload. The image can't be at the same time in and not in Public Domain. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 19:45, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

::::Okay, I suppose you're right, there's no way anyone can say it's not PD. But if we're going to change it, the source link given needs to be the actual one where you got the picture (and then I will add the BFI info separately). I'm wondering if we can find one like yours that doesn't have markings on it though... --Lobo (talk) 20:26, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

:::::Don't worry, I will re-upload it as a different file. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 20:28, 27 June 2012 (UTC)

Image:Copyright-problem.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on :Emil Wolfgang Menzel, Jr. requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article or image appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.

If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website or image but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:42, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

===Status and Advice===

As reviewing administrator, I have taken care of it. We have a template for this, Template:OA-attribution , and it should have been used. I placed it with the right parameter. Our template system and ways of indicating copyright are somewhat baroque, and it took me a while to find the correct one myself. However, see my note on the article talk p: it is usually best to do some substantial rewriting to make it clear that the authors of the judgements of value expressed are the particular people , who are certainly authoritative on the matter, Hopkins and Washburn. DGG ( talk ) 23:03, 7 October 2012 (UTC)

Hi. There is a convention for the layout of biographies on the English-language wikipedia. Other wikipedias may have a different convention. See Wikipedia:Manual_of_Style/Biographies#Opening_paragraph. Deb (talk) 08:35, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

:Thanks for the info, I didn't know that. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 11:15, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

::Why should you have known? There are so many rules here that it is difficult to find them; I don't know most of them myself! Happy editing. Deb (talk) 11:35, 9 December 2012 (UTC)

You might have endeavored to move my concert photo of Shirley rather than throwing it away. I have moved it lower down. Love the new one, though.--Nyctc7 (talk) 23:52, 16 August 2013 (UTC)

:You are right, but the section that represents the time period of the photo already contained an image. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 08:25, 17 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi Jan, thanks for noticing [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Yuri_Gavrilov&diff=617704196&oldid=617687773]. Apparently two articles were merged on wikidata that should not have been merged. That is why I made this error when adding the images to all interwiki links. I will try to take the big mess apart. Sincerely, Taketa (talk) 13:13, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

:Ok, I was just about to write you a message, but you noticed already. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 13:15, 20 July 2014 (UTC)

The old talk is archived at Talk:Pierre Salinger/Archive 1. The link is at the bottom of the page. Viriditas (talk) 06:11, 29 September 2014 (UTC)

{{Talkback|Icarus of old}}

{{talkback|78.26|The Limeliters|ts=10:23, 17 October 2014 (UTC)}}

78.26 _{(spin me / revolutions)} 10:23, 17 October 2014 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello Jan, I feel that you made a mistake, In astronomy Sunspots are where Solar Flares originate, I only added a external reference that I feel is appropriate. I still think that this little contribution was ok and added to the page in a good way, the comments, about vandalism are rude, how can you moderate and pass fair judgment if your not bias to the subject? Do you know what a Solar Flare is without looking it up? I guess all you do is troll Wikipedia, I am a Astronomer, avid stargazer, I know a lot about space! Can you say that? This is not a game! — Preceding unsigned comment added by AdamDHorton (talk • contribs) 22:40, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

:Hello AdamDHorton, I did not use the word vandalize, but apparently you read this in my response. So I suspect this is not the first time you are here. Wikipedia is not the place to promote your own blog, there is nothing more to say. --Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 23:32, 25 October 2014 (UTC)

OK, thanks for the advice. Quis separabit? 16:20, 6 December 2014 (UTC)

thank you Jan for your advice on capitalisation of Ed van der Elsken. Much appreciated. Vrolijk Kerstfeest!

>>Thanks for adding your image to the gallery. I suppose it is not easy to make an image like that. On the other hand, does the world need to know that you made this image? Or in a different way, does the article improve, when everybody knows you made this image? --Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 18:57, 1 January 2015 (UTC)<<

Thank Jan Arkesteijn for your message, I am pretty new on the Wiki and I came to know about the Sunspot through this article only good work, Do world need to know about my pic/work not necessarily and it does not help me any way I don't take pic for my living. My only intention to put on Wiki was to put some clean Pic (Under Gallery which I don't see) taken with normal camera so that it will be more connecting with the viewer and give a message that it can be viewed easily need not have high end equipment as most the current pics are from NASA. But anyway Looks like that pic is not making sense on this post. So not planning to re-attempt to load it. I am glad people like you are so active and trying to keep the wiki content clean and accurate. Wish you all best and a very happy new year 2015. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Shrichandray (talk • contribs) 12:17, 2 January 2015 (UTC)

When writing not only do you have to consider the proper tense, but the tense of the paragraph. --I am One of Many (talk) 18:09, 21 February 2015 (UTC)

You might be able to shed some light on the source of an image at Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Jacob van Strij - Het jacht van de kamer Rotterdam begroet een Oostindiëvaarder.jpg. – Editør (talk) 18:21, 18 March 2015 (UTC)

Hello,

You added a picture to the article of William C. Davis. He was a relatively minor politician who shares his name with the more popular Bill Davis who was Premier of Ontario from 1971-1985. Please ensure that when you add pictures they are accurate for the article. Thanks, EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 15:01, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

:I will take care. The mistake was made by the source, who calls him William C. Davis. Jan Arkesteijn (talk) 16:01, 21 May 2015 (UTC)

Hello Jan Arkesteijn, Thanks for your edits at Jim Clark. This photo-obsessed IP editor is a known problem (& has been for some time) and there have been discussions on my talk page, the project page and other user talk pages also. Admin. are also aware. A limited amount of progress has been made in recent days in respect of the anonymous user's editing habits and I would like to (most respectfully!) suggest that it would be good if we could exercise a cautious approach when it comes to editing or reverting his input. Please feel free to discuss with other interested editors if you so wish. Thanks. Happy editing! Regards, Eagleash (talk) 20:22, 21 September 2015 (UTC)

Hi,

You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:55, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

File:James D Watson.jpg]]

Hi Jan,

Just to let you know, the Featured Picture :File:James D Watson.jpg is scheduled to be Picture of the Day on April 6, 2016. If you get a chance, you can check and improve the caption at Template:POTD/2016-04-06. Thank you for all of your contributions! — Chris Woodrich (talk) 23:54, 20 March 2016 (UTC)

{{-}}

HarveyCarter is banned. Do not restore his contributions. Do not alter my signature on any of my talk page contributions. DrKay (talk) 06:45, 30 May 2016 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Jan Arkesteijn. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

File:Ambox warning blue.svg Thanks for uploading :File:Karen Alexander - Voyager.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:21, 16 March 2017 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning.svg

Thanks for uploading :File:Karen Alexander - Voyager.jpg. I noticed that this file is being used under a claim of fair use. However, I think that the way it is being used fails the first non-free content criterion. This criterion states that files used under claims of fair use may have no free equivalent; in other words, if the file could be adequately covered by a freely-licensed file or by text alone, then it may not be used on Wikipedia. If you believe this file is not replaceable, please:

1. Go to the file description page and add the text {{di-replaceable fair use disputed|}} below the original replaceable fair use template, replacing with a short explanation of why the file is not replaceable.
2. On the file discussion page, write a full explanation of why you believe the file is not replaceable.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media item by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by creating new media yourself (for example, by taking your own photograph of the subject).

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these media fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on [{{fullurl:Special:Contributions|target=Jan_Arkesteijn&namespace=6}} this link]. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per the non-free content policy. If you have any questions, please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Aspects (talk) 14:47, 18 March 2017 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Jan Arkesteijn. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Francis Spencer, 1st Baron Churchill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page William Owen ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Francis_Spencer%2C_1st_Baron_Churchill check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Francis_Spencer%2C_1st_Baron_Churchill?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 2 October 2018 (UTC)

A thread has been raised about your image replacements in articles at WP:ANI. --Fæ (talk) 18:15, 5 November 2018 (UTC)

{{Ivmbox|Hello, Jan Arkesteijn. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}

Per [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Administrators%27_noticeboard/Incidents&diff=869781459&oldid=869775443 the discussion here], you are banned from Wikipedia. You may appeal the ban per the procedure described under WP:UNBAN

Separately, you may also not in any way upload, modify, or otherwise work with files on the English Wikipedia. This ban may be appealed through the same procedure as above. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 09:28, 20 November 2018 (UTC)