User talk:Jchipmunk#top
Jchipmunk, you are invited to the Teahouse!
| style="margin: 1em 4em;" |
| valign="top"
| Hi Jchipmunk! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by {{noping|HostBot}} on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:04, 2 November 2019 (UTC) |
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation
Your thread has been archived
| style="margin: 1em 4em;" |
| valign="top"
| Hi Jchipmunk! You created a thread called {{tq|Infobox Logo}} at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Teahouse&action=edit§ion=new&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Follow-up to Infobox Logo}} create a new thread]. Archival by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, notification delivery by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{tlx|nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:02, 7 November 2019 (UTC) |
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:NG Model|NG Model]] (December 12)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:
{{divbox|blue|3=
This draft is written from the viewpoint of the company, focusing on what the company says about itself. Corporate notability is based on what independent reliable sources have written about the subject.
Not every business corporation is notable, and this draft does not establish corporate notability. You may ask for advice about corporate notability at the Teahouse.
Most of the references are not independent.}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:NG Model and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:NG Model, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:NG_Model Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Robert_McClenon&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:NG_Model reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Robert McClenon (talk) 02:16, 12 December 2019 (UTC)