User talk:King Work

|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid lightgrey; background-color:Seashell; vertical-align:top"|

|}

|} --Deepfriedokra (talk) 12:11, 17 September 2020 (UTC)

{{Talk header}}

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Aoi. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, :Ned's Newt, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aoi (青い) (talk) 07:01, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Ok I will King Work (talk) 14:22, 21 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello,

Please do not make user pages for anyone but yourself. It is inappropriate for you to edit in any other editor's user space except if you want to communicate with them on their user talk page. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:57, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

Sorry I won't do it again 😁. King Work (talk) 12:07, 22 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please do not add or change content, as you did at :Yo Gotti, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Robvanvee 07:09, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

Citation sources have already been added to the article and also there is a new section with citation sources, go check it out. King Work (talk) 20:30, 24 September 2020 (UTC)

:You need to source your work. If, it's already sourced elsewhere in the article you need to add a footnote to the source when adding information, especially WP:BLP articles. Robvanvee 19:51, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

Yes sir, I will. King Work (talk) 20:15, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

:That would be greatly appreciated, and please call me Rob. Robvanvee 20:55, 25 September 2020 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, I'm Jackmcbarn. I noticed that you recently removed content from :Grand Theft Auto VI without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jackmcbarn (talk) 17:12, 27 September 2020 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Fast Cash Boyz, does not have enough sources and citations as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Praxidicae (talk) 18:29, 28 September 2020 (UTC)

Hello King Work, and thanks for patrolling new pages! I am just letting you know that I declined the speedy deletion of :Draft:Rockstar Games, a page you tagged for speedy deletion, because of the following concern: Only the author of a page can request that it be speedily deleted under criterion G7. You may wish to review the WP:CSD{{!}}Criteria for Speedy Deletion before tagging further pages. Thank you. Jackmcbarn (talk) 23:29, 29 September 2020 (UTC)

That draft article is an copy of Rockstar Games do you understand! You know what, i will ask the author to delete that draft because its an copy of Rockstar Games King Work (talk) 01:22, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

And the user of this page was deleted. King Work (talk) 01:26, 30 September 2020 (UTC)

Only an administrator can block users. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:07, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

I didn't know that. But thanks for the warning. King Work (talk) 18:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

{{checkuserblock-account|sig=Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 18:20, 1 October 2020 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed|decline=I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
• #understand what you have been blocked for,
• #will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
• #will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information.

Because your block is for sockpuppetry, you must request unblock from your original account and declare each and every account you have used, at a minimum. The Standard Offer is likely the most plausible path for you. Kevin (aka L235 · t · c) 18:27, 1 October 2020 (UTC)|1=Im sorry for trying to block another user can you give me another chance. King Work (talk) 18:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)}}

{{unblock reviewed | 1= I know why i was blocked. I tried to block other users thinking they were admitting to another block user. I refrain that i will never do that again, and cause disruption towards other users. I was warned one time about editing other users pages to block them. I will not do that ever again, please trust me. I will also read the blocking policy to understand as well. And the accounts that you think i created. Those pages are not mine, not even Romello Brooks, and im not admitting to being neither one of them. So this is my orginial account not those pages. I just created this page. King Work (talk) 18:32, 1 October 2020 (UTC) | decline = A CheckUser has confirmed that is a sock of Romello Brooks. RickinBaltimore (talk) 18:36, 1 October 2020 (UTC)}}

How im not even Romello Brooks. So stop thinking im that user. I don't know him, didn't see him in person. I don't have to waste my time. Because i already said im not admitting Romello Brooks. King Work (talk) 18:47, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

I already said I'm not going to cause disruption anymore. King Work (talk) 19:08, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

:[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AKing_Work&type=revision&diff=981340923&oldid=981339455 ...i already said im not admitting Romello Brooks], is definitely true, because you said the same thing [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Richard_Raleigh&diff=prev&oldid=978068904 here], with another one of your accounts. -- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:23, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

::and here you are [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AThomas9877&type=revision&diff=974751650&oldid=974747832 not admitting again].-- Jezebel's Ponyo^{bons mots} 19:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

Those are not my accounts. I don't know who is Richard Raleigh is. Y'all don't believe folks. King Work (talk) 19:37, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

That's another user from another IP address. King Work (talk) 19:38, 1 October 2020 (UTC)

:Not wasting any more time with this. Talk page access removed. RickinBaltimore (talk) 19:39, 1 October 2020 (UTC)