User talk:Kkumarii komal

Hello, Kkumarii komal, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as :Big Cricket League, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's content policies and may not be retained. In short, the topic of an article must be notable and have already been the subject of publication by reliable and independent sources.

Please review Your first article for an overview of the article creation process. The Article Wizard is available to help you create an article, where it will be reviewed and considered for publication. For information on how to request a new article that can be created by someone else, see Requested articles. If you are stuck, come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can help you through the processes.

New to Wikipedia? Please consider taking a look at our introductory tutorial or reviewing the contributing to Wikipedia page to learn the basics about editing. Below are a few other good pages about article creation.

• Article development
• Standard layout
• Lead section
• The perfect article
• Task Center{{snd}}need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, ask me on my talk page. You can also type {{tl|help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:28, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Image:Information icon4.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on :Big Cricket League requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Big+Cricket+League|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 08:28, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on :Big Cricket League (BCL), requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Big+Cricket+League+%28BCL%29|deleting administrator}}. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 10:02, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

:Hi,

:The page that was created was not for advertisement or for spaming others. It's purely educational explaining a popular league in India. And as there are already pages on other leagues like the Indian Premier League, Indian Street Premier League and such, why aren''t they removed if that's advertising? The page didn't had any promotional values, it only explained the process of the league and how it's loved by the audience. Kkumarii komal (talk) 07:53, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

Image:Information icon4.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on :Big Cricket League (BCL) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Big+Cricket+League+%28BCL%29|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:34, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

It is almost never suitable to copy content from another web site to Wikipedia, for more than one reason, the most important being copyright. When you post anything to Wikipedia you release it for anyone in the world to reuse it, either unchanged or modified in any way whatever, subject to attribution to Wikipedia. It is very rare that the owner of a web site licenses content for such very free reuse, and in those few occasions when they do so, we require proof of the fact. We don't assume that content is freely licensed on the unsubstantiated say so of just anyone who comes along and creates a Wikipedia account. JBW (talk) 10:43, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

:The material which was in the first draft of the page that I created was nowhere copied from anywhere. All i did was provide the source of the information that i was using for the article. Kkumarii komal (talk) 11:38, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

:: What?? There were whole paragraphs of the page you created which were word for word identical to text at https://www.bigcricketleague.com/about and you must know it. JBW (talk) 14:38, 8 February 2025 (UTC)

:::Well, that was the reason why the citation and links were connected to the website itself. Kkumarii komal (talk) 05:51, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

::::Attribution is not sufficient. The content must be written in your own words. Please review the links in the following message:

::::File:Copyright-problem.svg One of your recent edits has been removed in whole or in part, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without evidence of permission from the copyright holder. If you {{em|are}} the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for information on how to contribute your work appropriately. For legal reasons, Wikipedia strictly cannot host copyrighted text or images from print media or digital platforms without an appropriate and verifiable license. Contributions infringing on copyright will be removed. You may use external websites or publications as a source of {{em|information}}, but not as a source of {{em|content}}, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously, and persistent violators of our copyright policy will be blocked from editing. See Wikipedia:Copying text from other sources for more information. -- Ponyo^{bons mots} 21:17, 10 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, Kkumarii komal. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page :Big Cricket League, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for article subjects for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{tl|edit COI}} template), including links or details of reliable sources that support your suggestions;
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see {{Section link|Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI}});
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see {{Section link|Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming}});
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicizing, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you.{{#ifexpr: ({{#time: U | now}} - 1739270205) < 13150000 | {{PAGENAME}} | }} Cabayi (talk) 10:36, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Big Cricket League. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cabayi (talk) 11:00, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

:Have submitted the draft for review, how much time it usually takes for the review to be completed and getting a feedback? Kkumarii komal (talk) 11:40, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

::You submitted it for review, then you removed the review tags and moved it back to mainspace without waiting for the review to happen. Cabayi (talk) 20:27, 11 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Nuvola apps important.svg Please stop. If you continue to add promotional or advertising material to Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Also, moving an unsuitable article to draftspace provides an opportunity for improvement, and returning it to mainspace while it is still unsuitable is likely to lead to deletion. JBW (talk) 21:33, 12 February 2025 (UTC){{PAGENAME}}

:Could you please highlight the paragraphs or lines that indicated promotion or advertising? Kkumarii komal (talk) 05:56, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

: Paragraphs 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, & 6 all contained unambiguously promotional language, with much of paragraphs 4 & 5 reading like straight marketing copy. JBW (talk) 14:07, 13 February 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks for the feedback, will try to change it Kkumarii komal (talk) 07:40, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

:::Is there a way where I can share the written material and it's reviewed in a day? The draft review takes 2 months. Kkumarii komal (talk) 07:41, 14 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Big Cricket League. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Cabayi (talk) 13:47, 7 March 2025 (UTC)

:Could you please highlight the paragraphs that had promotional language in them? And the sentences that lacked proper backing? Kkumarii komal (talk) 12:35, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

::That is what the review process is for. Wait for the review rather than repeatedly trying to bypass it. What is the urgency? Cabayi (talk) 09:44, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

:Did I move the last article directly into mainspace after it was moved to draft? I simply submitted it for review an patiently waiting for it to be reviewed. Then why am I blocked? Kkumarii komal (talk) 06:51, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

:: Five times you moved a draft to mainspace. To claim you never did so is ridiculous. JBW (talk) 10:23, 10 March 2025 (UTC)

{{unblock reviewed|decline=You were not blocked for "submitting a draft for review and patiently waiting for it to be reviewed"; quite the opposite, in fact. The reasons for your block are plainly visible in the litany of warnings and discussions earlier on this page, as well as being clearly enumerated in the above block notice. Your appeal needs to address these reasons, which your current one does not. I am declining your appeal. DoubleGrazing (talk) 08:04, 10 March 2025 (UTC)|1=When the article was moved to draft, how can I be blocked when I submitted it for review and I'm patiently waiting for it to be reviewed? How can I know what changes are to be made and how can I make those changes after the review is made if I'm blocked from editing? Kkumarii komal (talk) 06:55, 10 March 2025 (UTC)}}

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC