User talk:LGT55

Hi LGT55! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Happy editing!

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to the Balkans or Eastern Europe, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template.

:how page? LGT55 (talk) 15:37, 25 November 2024 (UTC)

Hi LGT55, does the following account also belong to you?

• {{checkuser|Ömerfrk4334}}

Please note that while multiple accounts are allowed in some cases, the usual rule on Wikipedia is "one editor, one account". Please see Wikipedia:Sockpuppetry for more information. If the Ömerfrk4334 account does belong to you, then that is fine as long as you only use this LGT55 account going forward and not the old one. Thanks, Mz7 (talk) 06:44, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

:I only use this account now. already LGT55 (talk) 07:59, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

::Ok, thank you. Mz7 (talk) 19:19, 14 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, LGT55,

Thank you for creating Battle of Comana Monastery.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

{{Quote|1=This page relies largely or entirely upon a single source. Please addd more sources that support the individual claims in the article.}}

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 23:52, 26 January 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Karasu (October 1773). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because of multiple issues (check maintenance tags on page)'''.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Est. 2021 (talk · contribs) 22:57, 27 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello LGT55,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Battle of Karasu (May1773) for deletion, because it's a redirect that seems implausible or is an unlikely search term.

If you don't want Battle of Karasu (May1773) to be deleted, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{urlencode:Talk:Battle of Karasu (May1773)}}&action=edit§ion=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Adamtt9 (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi LGT55. Thank you for your work on Battle of Karasu (May 1773). Another editor, MPGuy2824, has reviewed it as part of new pages patrol and left the following comment:

{{Bq|1=nothing of note is mentioned in the target article about May 1773}}

To reply, leave a comment here and begin it with {{code|{{Re|MPGuy2824}}}}. (Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

-MPGuy2824 (talk) 08:57, 28 January 2025 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Mongolian-Japanese Conflicts, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. TheWikiholic (talk) 15:00, 30 January 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning blue.svg:Template:Campaignbox Russo-Turkish War (1710-1713) has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 10:43, 1 February 2025 (UTC)

Image:Information icon4.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on :Japanese-Korean Wars requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Japanese-Korean+Wars|deleting administrator}}, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. 🔥YesI'mOnFire🔥^{(ContainThisEmber?)} 14:22, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, please note that there is a Manual of Style that should be followed to maintain a consistent, encyclopedic appearance. Deviating from this style, as you did in :Asian and Pacific theatre of World War I, disturbs uniformity among articles and may cause readability or accessibility problems. Please take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Remsense ‥ 论 18:30, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

File:Information orange.svg Please refrain from making edits generated using a large language model (an "AI chatbot" or other application using such technology) in Wikipedia pages without carefully reviewing them, such as those you made to :Draft:Palestinian Campaign, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. Thank you. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/it/other neos • talk • edits) 13:07, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi, I see you removed the {{t|AI generated}} template from User:BEFOR01's article Siege of Baghdad (1821). Does this mean that you've been able to verify the cited sources? I couldn't see that any of the books actually existed, from a superficial check. Belbury (talk) 19:08, 6 February 2025 (UTC)

:Hi Belbury,

:Thanks for reaching out! I removed the {{AI generated}} template because I have verified the sources and ensured that the article is based on reliable references. The books and documents cited do exist, and I can provide additional details if needed. If there's a specific source you found questionable, let me know, and I’ll clarify or replace it if necessary.

:I appreciate your feedback!

:– [BEFOR01] BEFOR01 (talk) 11:19, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

::@BEFOR01: Hi. You didn't remove the template, LGT55 removed the template.

::Are BEFOR01 and LGT55 the same person? Belbury (talk) 11:46, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

:::No, we are not the same person, but I asked a friend of mine for help yesterday, it could be him. BEFOR01 (talk) 12:24, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Transylvania Campaign (1613), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Principality of Transylvania. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:54, 7 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Kuban Campaign (1736). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🌙Eclipse 🌹 ⚧ (she/they/it • talk • edits) 16:06, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Siege of Azov (1697). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/it • talk • edits) 19:52, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi LGT55! I noticed your contributions to :Battle of Kalaus (1769) and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

{{Clickable button|Help:Introduction|Learn more about editing|class=mw-ui-progressive|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Teahouse|Get help at the Teahouse|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

{{Clickable button|Wikipedia:Task Center|Volunteer at the Task Center|style=margin-left: 1.6em;}}

Happy editing! G4† (talk) 20:41, 12 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Palestinian Campaign. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it consists of machine-generated text.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. 🌙Eclipse (she/they/it/other neos • talk • edits) 13:05, 15 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Egypt Campaign (1786-1787). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 14:48, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Kuban Campaign (1737). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:04, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Buynak. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:05, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Hi there. While reviewing new pages, I noticed that a page you created, Battle of Kalaus (1769), does not appear to meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines as a standalone article. As an alternative to deletion, I've redirected it to Russo-Turkish war (1768–1774). If you disagree, feel free to revert my redirect and we can proceed to a deletion discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion. (If you reply to me here, please ping me as I am not watching this page.) Thanks! Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:12, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Teberda (1769). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Dclemens1971 (talk) 15:13, 26 February 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Battle of Akhalkalaki (1807). Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 17:30, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

An article you recently created, Battle of Kurttepe, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 00:14, 23 April 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello, LGT55. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Siege of Silistra, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 20:08, 25 April 2025 (UTC)