User talk:Lamb Ham Jam Man

Image:Stop hand nuvola.svg This is your last warning. The next time you add unreliably sourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at :Shadow people, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. McGeddon (talk) 19:20, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Is "shadowpeople.com" not a source? I apologise if this is the case. Lamb Ham Jam Man (talk) 19:21, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

:I'm afraid it's not a reliable source. Thanks for your attempts to reference unsourced statements, but amateur websites aren't any use to Wikipedia as sources. --McGeddon (talk) 19:24, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

:: Thanks for letting me know. I have been looking for references but sadly there is often not much in the newspaper about shadow people. Perhaps it is the very nature of shadow people that they are difficult to source. Lamb Ham Jam Man (talk) 19:26, 8 February 2013 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation

{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Teahouse talkback|WP:Teahouse/Questions|ts=gwickwire^talk_edits 18:36, 15 February 2013 (UTC)}}

You are asking questions at teahouse about shredding documents. The purpose of tea house is to answer questions about editing (not reading) wikipedia. please stop. Gtwfan52 (talk) 18:48, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

Hello. Thank you for your message. I have asked my question at the reference desk and they seem to have some answers for me already. I have to say, when I saw the sign "A Friendly Place" on my invite to the Tea House, and on the top of the page, I'd expect people to have a little patience rather than instantly start telling me off and that I'm not using the place correctly. I find your tone and Charles's quite unwelcoming. Lamb Ham Jam Man (talk) 19:09, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

:Sorry about that Lam Ham Jam Man. The editors in question are correct that the Teahouse is for advice on editing; however, they really went about letting you know the wrong way. I hope you're not too put off and that you'll drop by the Teahouse again if you have any questions on editing. Ryan Vesey 19:12, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

{{talkback|Gtwfan52|ts=20:28, 15 February 2013 (UTC)}}

Gtwfan52 (talk) 20:28, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

{{talkback|Gtwfan52|ts=21:05, 15 February 2013 (UTC)}}

Gtwfan52 (talk) 21:05, 15 February 2013 (UTC)

It's been an exciting year for the Teahouse and you were a part of it. Thanks so much for visiting, asking questions, sharing answers, being friendly and helpful, and just keeping Teahouse an awesome place. You can read more about the impact we're having and the [http://blog.wikimedia.org/2013/02/27/wikipedia-teahouse-celebrates-its-first-birthday reflections of other guests and hosts] like you. Please come by the Teahouse to celebrate with us, and enjoy this sparkly cupcake badge as our way of saying thank you. And, Happy Birthday!

{{Wikipedia:Teahouse/Badge/First|size=}}

:--Ocaasi and the rest of the Teahouse Team 22:20, 27 February 2013 (UTC)

Hi. The Wikipedia:WikiProject Europe/The 10,000 Challenge has recently started, based on the UK/Ireland Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge. The idea is not to record every minor edit, but to create a momentum to motivate editors to produce good content improvements and creations and inspire people to work on more countries than they might otherwise work on. There's also the possibility of establishing smaller country or regional challenges for places like Germany, Italy, the Benelux countries, Iberian Peninsula, Romania, Slovenia etc, much like Wikipedia:The 1000 Challenge (Nordic). For this to really work we need diversity and exciting content and editors from a broad range of countries regularly contributing. If you would like to see masses of articles being improved for Europe and your specialist country like Wikipedia:WikiProject Africa/The Africa Destubathon, sign up today and once the challenge starts a contest can be organized. This is a way we can target every country of Europe, and steadily vastly improve the encyclopedia. We need numbers to make this work so consider signing up as a participant and also sign under any country sub challenge on the page that you might contribute to! Thank you. --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 09:27, 6 November 2016 (UTC)

{{Template:50k Invite}}--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)

thumb

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the meta:2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{tl|User wikipedia/RC Patrol|}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, {{u|Stevietheman}} — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Hi. We're into the last five days of the Women in Red World Contest. There's a new bonus prize of $200 worth of books of your choice to win for creating the most new women biographies between 0:00 on the 26th and 23:59 on 30th November. If you've been contributing to the contest, thank you for your support, we've produced over 2000 articles. If you haven't contributed yet, we would appreciate you taking the time to add entries to our articles achievements list by the end of the month. Thank you, and if participating, good luck with the finale!

You may be interested in Wikipedia:Categories for discussion/Log/2021 August 21#Category:Wikipedians who know where their towel is. It is proposed to delete this category. SpinningSpark 16:31, 30 August 2021 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Beast of Bevendean has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Topic is not notable and all sources come from the same publisher.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dr vulpes ^{(💬 • 📝)} 05:43, 25 August 2022 (UTC)