User talk:LesIie

|class="MainPageBG" style="width: 55%; border:1px solid #FFFFFF; background-color:#F5FFFA; vertical-align:top"|

|}

|}

Image:Information.svg Hello, I'm Aqurs1. I noticed that in [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?oldid=1268762363&diff=1268762551 this edit] to :Abdul Hamid Khan (general), you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Aqurs1 (talk) 12:02, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

:Hello Aqurs1, thank you for your feedback regarding my edit. I appreciate your concern and the effort you put into reviewing the page. I would like to clarify that my intention in changing the infobox from "military person" to "officeholder" was based on Abdul Hamid Khan’s significant roles in public office during his tenure from 1969 to 1971

:In particular, the "officeholder" infobox allows for a clearer presentation of his various administrative and political offices, which the "military person" infobox does not adequately accommodate. This change was made to enhance the structure and readability of the article, ensuring that readers get a comprehensive understanding of his responsibilities beyond the military sphere. Taeyab (talk) 12:05, 11 January 2025 (UTC)

Hello, Taeyab,

Thank you for creating Javed Hassan.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

{{Quote|1=High quality reliable sources (WP:RS) sources are required that specifically provide biographical information about the subject. Fleeting mentions in other publications or websites are not sufficient to establish notability.}}

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Kudpung}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 18:53, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

:{{Re|Kudpung}}

:Hello, Kudpung,

:Thank you for your feedback and help on this page. I have added a few more citations to improve the reliability and quality of the information on Javed Hassan's page. I believe these sources address the concerns raised regarding notability and biographical details. If you need further clarification or additional sources, please feel free to let me know. I must state that finding reliable sources for Javed Hassan proves to be a difficult task due to the unavailability of information of them online.

:I look forward to your review, and I hope the page can now meet the required standards.

:Thank you again for your assistance!

:Best regards,

:Taeyab ~~~~ Taeyab (talk) 19:26, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Tauqir Zia, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Khalid Mahmood. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:57, 21 January 2025 (UTC)

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Dhaka defence scheme (adhoc), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Hilli.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 27 February 2025 (UTC)

I had been recently read a book (Encyclopedia of Wars)

[https://books.google.com.pk/books/about/Encyclopedia_of_Wars.html?id=E-SUAQAACAAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y]https://books.google.com.pk/books/about/Encyclopedia_of_Wars.html?id=E-SUAQAACAAJ&source=kp_book_description&redir_esc=y

and here is written that Pakistan suffered from 1,500 killed and 4,300 wounded meanwhile India suffered from 2,713 killed and 4,300 wounded.

https://prussia.online/Data/Book/en/encyclopedia-of-wars/Encyclopedia%20of%20Wars%20(2005),%20OCR.pdf

And in another book Warfare and Armed Conflict (A statistical Encyclopedia of Casualties and other figures) written the same thing that india suffered from 3,712 killed and 7,638 wounded+killed meanwhile Pakistan lost 1,500 killed and 5,800 wounded+killed.

https://books.google.com.pk/books?id=kNzCDgAAQBAJ&pg=PA600&redir_esc=y#v=onepage&q&f=false

Even indian parliament claims that india suffered from ~3,200 killed and 8,000 wounded

https://archive.pib.gov.in/archive/releases98/lyr2001/rdec2001/05122001/r0512200129.html

But in 1965 war Wikipedia page written that Pakistan suffered from 3,800 Casualties and india suffered from 3,000 Casualties Comsats777 (talk) 05:31, 1 March 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template.

{{{icon|File:Information.svg}}} Beware of being recruited to make a specific edit by someone else. Please understand that Wikipedia does not condone such activity; users should act in their individual capacity, rather than editing under the direction or influence of others. Another editor who wants a specific edit made can make it themselves, unless Wikipedia's safeguards prevent them from doing so. Don't help them circumvent the rules. If they have a legitimate reason for the edit, they can use the edit request mechanism to propose it and have it reviewed by an uninvolved editor with more experience. Thank you. --Worldbruce (talk) 06:09, 8 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Information icon4.svg

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:Taeyab reported by User:Insanityclown1 (Result: ). Thank you. Insanityclown1 (talk) 06:56, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. I noticed that your recent edit to :1947 Gilgit rebellion did not have an edit summary. You can use the edit summary field to explain your reasoning for an edit, or to provide a description of what the edit changes. Summaries save time for other editors and reduce the chances that your edit will be misunderstood. For some edits, an adequate summary may be quite brief.

The edit summary field looks like this:

{{Edit summary field/OOUI}}

Please provide an edit summary for every edit you make. With a Wikipedia account, you can give yourself a reminder by setting {{myprefs|3|check={{int:tog-forceeditsummary}}}}, and then click the "{{int:saveprefs}}" button.

Thanks!{{sp}} Kautilya3 (talk) 07:37, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

: Your edits also involve WP:OR, which is prohibited on Wikipedia. An infobox should only summarise the article content, not your own ideas. -- Kautilya3 (talk) 07:39, 7 April 2025 (UTC)

A 2023 RfC concluded that "supported by" sections are generally inappropriate in military conflict infoboxes. The information is usually too nuanced for what is meant as a high level summary. Any exceptions require prior consensus. -- Worldbruce (talk) 01:17, 9 April 2025 (UTC)

{{ivmbox | image = Commons-emblem-notice.svg |imagesize=50px | bg = #E5F8FF | text = You have recently edited a page related to India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.

A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have an expanded level of powers and discretion in order to reduce disruption to the project.

Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:

• adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
• comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
• follow editorial and behavioural best practices;
• comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
• refrain from gaming the system.

Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures, you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{tl|Ctopics/aware}} template.

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited William Harrison (brigadier), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Commodore.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 20:01, 20 May 2025 (UTC)

See WP:AE, especially the section [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#LesIie here] where your conduct is currently being discussed. ❯❯❯Pravega ^g=9.8 08:59, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

In the lead of William Harrison (brigadier) you make various statements about him: that he "played a pivotal role", was described as a "pawn in Niazi's doomed chess game", and "is also accused of war crimes". For these assertions you cite:

• {{Cite book |last=Niazi |first=Lt. Gen. A.A.K. |title=The Betrayal of East Pakistan |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=1998}}
• {{Cite book |last=Salik |first=Siddiq |url=https://books.google.co.uk/books/about/Witness_To_Surrender.html?id=2IO7xMd2T2cC&redir_esc=y |title=Witness To Surrender |date=1977 |publisher=Oxford University Press |isbn=978-81-7062-108-9 |language=en}}
• {{Cite news|url=https://www.thedailystar.net/supplements/victory-day-special-2017/genocide-1505440|title=Genocide|date=2017-12-16|work=The Daily Star|language=en|access-date=2019-05-18}}

Can you explain why none of these three sources contain the name Harrison?

Later you cite:

• Rashid, Haroon. "Military Strategies in the 1971 Conflict." Journal of South Asian History, vol. 23, no. 4, 2001, pp. 331–349.
• {{Cite book |last=Feroz |first=Ahmad |title=The 1971 War: A Retrospective Analysis |publisher=Karachi: Defence Publications |year=2002 |no-tracking=yes}}
• {{Cite book |last=Burki |first=S. Javed |title=Pakistan’s Military: Past, Present and Future |publisher=Oxford University Press |year=2004 |pages=195–199}}

Can you explain why WorldCat has no record of such a journal or such books, why Google Scholar doesn't show anyone ever citing them, and why Oxford University Press has no record of ever publishing such a book by Burki? Can you supply an ISSN for the journal or ISBNs for the books? Did you consult these sources yourself, or did you see them cited elsewhere? --Worldbruce (talk) 15:51, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hi @LesIie, sorry to do this. Your actions have clearly been both disruptive and dishonest, but I do think they're consistent with "new editor, excited to contribute, panics and makes the worst possible choices at basically every turn". I expect you will want to get out of this block, and I can tell you that this will be a very hard block to escape from, so please take some advice, if that's what you want to do: first, don't make an unblock request for at least a month; you need to get out of panic mode, and you need to be able to demonstrate to an unblocks admin that you have some self-control. Second, don't use LLMs for anything to do with Wikipedia, at any stage in the process, ever again. Third, for the love of all that is good and holy, do not create any new sockpuppet accounts; that way leads to a community ban (WP:3X), which will take years to get out of, if you ever manage it. Good luck.

:If you did all of this knowingly and not out of blind panic, my advice instead is: don't let the door hit you on your way out. -- asilvering (talk) 15:03, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

::Thanks for the advice, I think "new editor, excited to contribute, panics and makes the worst possible choices at basically every turn" is the right way to describe it, even though I, rather spectacularly, made an extremely high amount of bad moves. There is no need to be sorry because i clearly asked for it. I do plan to return in the future when I learn to fully abide by Wikipedias rules and standards. LesIie (talk) 15:30, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

:::Cheers, and good luck. In the meantime you may be interested in contributing to a sister project like Commons. Be sure to read the licensing guidelines there carefully, since it looks like you've run into trouble there in this regard already (common newbie mistake). -- asilvering (talk) 20:24, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :William Harrison (brigadier) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not notable. See Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement#LesIie.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Worldbruce (talk) 22:33, 2 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Military dictatorship in Pakistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor, has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:01, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Indo-Pakistani air war of 1971 has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (>95% of content), has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:03, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:03, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Agha Humayun Amin has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and main contributor (>88% of content), has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:05, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Ibex Force has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (>98% of content), has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:06, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:06, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Babar Khan (officer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (>97% of content), has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:08, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Doko, Pakistan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (>97% of content), has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Also, on a spot check, several of the sources cited in the current version are clearly non-RS. Abecedare (talk) 20:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:11, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Shingus has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (>94% of content), has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:13, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Pathankot airstrike has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (only 81% of content but [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Pathankot_airstrike&diff=1293400869&oldid=1278133406 other editors' contributions] have been mainly copyedits and formatting, MOS-related) , has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:17, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Battle of Kasur (1965) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (>98% of content) , has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:18, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Papaldo has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (>91% of content) , has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Also, a spot-check shows that at least some of the sources cited in the current version are non-RS or WP:UGC. Abecedare (talk)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:21, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Dhaka defence scheme (adhoc) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (>89% of content, with the other contributions being mainly copy-edits or formatting and MOS fixes) , has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:23, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:23, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Farrukh Bakht Ali has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (only 78% of content but the other [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Farrukh_Bakht_Ali&diff=1291959502&oldid=1277788963 editors' contributions] have been mainly copyedits and adding categories) , has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:26, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:26, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Commander of the Eastern Command (Pakistan) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

[WP:TNT]]. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (>93% of content) , has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:27, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Chief of Staff (Pakistan Army) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (>95% of content) , has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Agha Muhammad Ali Khan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (95% of content) , has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:29, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Baqir Siddiqui has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (>92% of content), has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:31, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Javed Hassan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

WP:TNT. Article creator, and sole significant contributor (>90% of content) , has been found to fabricate and misrepresent sources, perhaps as a result of using LLMs. See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Enforcement&oldid=1293804603#LesIie discussion at AE]. Abecedare (talk) 20:32, 3 June 2025 (UTC)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Abecedare (talk) 20:32, 3 June 2025 (UTC)