User talk:Magnolia677#AWB skip text

If it was up to you, there would have been no mention of Tiffany Henyard's misdeeds. If it was up to you, whenever a Wikipedian does some footwork and contributes a fine picture to the encyclopedia, it would be removed because it is "decorative". If it was up to you, there would be no mention at all in the lead, for a town of about 20K people, that the Pope was raised there. You continually and bewilderingly remove interesting and valid content from the article, and I have to ask: what is your issue? Marcus Markup (talk) 12:17, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

:The picture of the house the Pope was raised in... removing that was the last straw. You need to knock it off. Marcus Markup (talk) 12:33, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

Special:Diff/1289650624 - Both the 2023 estimate and the 2024 estimate are accessible the same way on that page. Why would you prefer to show the 2023 estimate than the 2024 estimate then? Player001eliminated (talk) 01:35, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Player001eliminated}} Do you have a direct link to the URL where the specific data is available? Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:27, 10 May 2025 (UTC)

If the Angeline Academy of Innovation page has the same kind of recognitions section, Pasco eSchool should have it too. If you think no page should have it, then delete it on both. Floating Orb (talk) 17:08, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

:Also, some of the awards cite to Facebook. I could delete those. The other ones are from better sources. Floating Orb (talk) 17:19, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

::{{ping|Floating Orb}} I have already pointed to a consensus that discourages the promotional edits you are making to the school you attend, yet you keep edit warring to add this puffery. I have cautioned you about COI editing, but you're not getting it. Magnolia677 (talk) 21:51, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Yes. But Angeline Academy of Innovation has the same section. Floating Orb (talk) 21:52, 23 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Sorry for the edit war. I removed the information. Can you still take a look at the Angeline Academy of Innovation page? Floating Orb (talk) 00:39, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Also, what about the COI issue? Is it any better now than before? Floating Orb (talk) 01:41, 25 May 2025 (UTC)

Hi @Magnolia677! I wanted to know when the COI tag on Pasco eSchool would be able to be taken down. Floating Orb (talk) 21:22, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Floating Orb}} I tagged the article because a major contributor has a close association, but I've never removed one. You may want to make inquiries. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:18, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

::Okay. When could I remove it? Floating Orb (talk) 22:19, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:::I suppose when enough content has been added that it's no longer filled with content from a COI editor. But that's just speculation. I'm not really sure what the removal criteria is. That's why I told you to make some inquires. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:26, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

::::Okay. But what about if I removed anything that could be considered subjective from the page? Maybe then it wouldn't be considered COI. Floating Orb (talk) 22:48, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::Please stop asking me the same question. I don't have an answer. Ask someone who knows. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:51, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::Okay, I'll do that. Thank you. Floating Orb (talk) 22:54, 26 May 2025 (UTC)

You agree FSC is notable and they've awarded her two awards (lifetime achievement & leadership) which should be reflected in the article. What justification are you removing one and not the other whilst conceding its notabilty? This is arbitrary and subjective on your part. IPIPIPIP (talk) 21:08, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|IPIPIPIP}} Please discuss on the article talk page. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 22:16, 30 May 2025 (UTC)

Hello, could you explain what do you mean by [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morpeth%2C_Ontario&diff=1293733942&oldid=1293676433 "photo doesn't fit in article"]? That community has literally two distinctive buildings: Anglican Church and United Church. So, I don't see a reason why you chose to delete the photo (and sourced mentions) of the Anglican Church. --Amakuha (talk) 01:18, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Amakuha}} Thank you for writing. That article is fairly short, and [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Morpeth,_Ontario&oldid=1293676433 your version] disrupts the visual uniformity by sandwiching text, and by pushing a section heading inward (see MOS:IMAGELOC). I would suggest adding a link to the Commons at the bottom of the article, so readers can easily access all the photos related to this article. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:08, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

:: I can see that the article is short. But you made it shorter by deleting the sourced text that I added regarding the church of interest.

:: Frankly, it's the first time I see "this article is too short for more content" approach. --Amakuha (talk) 21:56, 6 June 2025 (UTC)

Half of the wikipedia article for Sneed, AR is unsourced info. The tornado that hit it was from 1929 and was barely documented, so I feel as its at least somewhat excusable to add info that was done by original research (more so if its some small fact) and it can be left as true until proven otherwise. MadeForLosers (talk) 22:53, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

:I'm not sure what your question is? Magnolia677 (talk) 22:58, 16 June 2025 (UTC)

::My question is, why remove my edit in Sneed, AR because of unsourced info when half of the article itself is unsourced, as well as the tornado event being more undocumented than not MadeForLosers (talk) 00:43, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:::Adding more unsourced content will only make the article less reliable for readers. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:44, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

style="background-color: var(--background-color-success-subtle, #fdffe7); border: 1px solid var(--border-color-success, #fceb92); color: var(--color-base, #202122);" |rowspan="2" style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 5px;" | 100px |style="font-size: x-large; padding: 3px 3px 0 3px; height: 1.5em;" | The Original Barnstar

style="vertical-align: middle; padding: 3px;" | Hope you're having a good day. My day is good, though I'm in a flood warning (lol). Ignore MAB's crap. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! ☩ (Babysharkboss2) 22:48, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Babysharkboss2}} Thank you so much! Hope you're on high ground. Cheers! Magnolia677 (talk) 22:52, 17 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello,

"Still" means it's in the 2023 edition of the book. There's one edition of that book. The 2023 edition.

The claim that Miller has distanced himself from Project 2025 is only valid for the website. Which we don't have anymore. There are many lists online, e.g. Newsweek, and none of them are reliable.

So as a matter of permanent record, Miller's organization is indeed in the list of the Advisory board. There are not 100s, like said on Project2025 dot org.

I'm not sure how you want to play this out, but now you're at 4 reverts. Selbsportrait (talk) 00:08, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

Hi Magnolia677. Hope you're doing well. You might wish to see my [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=America_First_Legal&diff=prev&oldid=1296289690 last edit] of America First Legal. Kind regards, Quaerens-veritatem (talk) 02:54, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|Quaerens-veritatem}} Clear as a mud-free river. Thanks! Magnolia677 (talk) 10:44, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

While I know he lived at 20 Forest Ridge Drive as years ago I met him there on his front lawn, you're quite right that Wikipedia requires citations.

It appears that many of those listed as residing in Forest Hill are there because they attended Forest Hill Collegiate.

1. Rosie Shuster attended high school (verifiable with citation) with Lorne Michaels who verifiably attended Forest Hill Collegiate.

2. It follows that Frank Shuster her father also lived in Forest Hill.

3. I can provide a citation that Frank Shuster lived only a few doors down from Johnny Wayne.

On this basis would you object if I reverted the entry (with the above citations) for Wayne and added Frank and Rosalie Shuster to the list? GelvinM (talk) 15:44, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|GelvinM}} I'm not sure what your question is. Magnolia677 (talk) 16:43, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

::Would you be OK with listing the above people as notable (albeit former) residents of Forest Hill, Toronto, providing the above citations as proof? Since you asked me to discuss this on your talk page I thought it prudent and friendly to consult you about this first. If you have no objection I will go ahead and make the changes, or is there more to discuss?

::I also note that none of the following Wikipedia biographies listed (which serve as references) for John Bitove, Shenae Grimes-Beech, Dan Kanter, Michael Landsberg, Stephen Lewis, Peter Munk (only his wife is mentioned as growing up in Forest Hill), Andy Pringle and Valerie Pringle, Colby Rasmus, none of the 3 members of the Rogers family, Perry Rosemond, Joseph Rotman, Isadore Sharp, Larry Tanenbaum, Nelson Thall nor Galen Weston reference the neighbourhood though perhaps one of the supplied references do, so perhaps a {{citation needed}} needs to be added? GelvinM (talk) 18:05, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

:::{{ping|GelvinM}} If a notable person only attended school in the city, they should not be included. Any other notable people need a source supporting they were born there, or lived there a significant period of time. Most editors are ok if their is a reliable source on the person's article supporting they lived there. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:54, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

::::Can you clarify as I would prefer a more direct answer - do you mean establishing that they lived in the city or lived in the neighbourhood? Also, would you object to including Wayne and the Shusters as notable residents in the article?

::::ie: Rosalie Shuster verifiably went to the same high school as Lorne Michaels and was born in Toronto. Her parents never divorced, she obviously lived at home with them and lived there a long time. It's remotely possible that she (and others - it's an excellent school) lived in a different catchment area but she walked to school as Lorne Michaels followed her home at age 14 so it's unlikely. If it's valid to state that she lived in Forest Hill then so did Frank Shuster. https://theneighborhoodnewsonline.net/local-people/interviews/1318-rosie-shuster-saturday-night-live-alumni

::::Frank Shuster lived just a few doors away from Johnny Wayne. It follows that Wayne lived in the same neighbourhood of Forest Hill. https://www.aaron.ca/living-in-shusters-house/

::::If living in the same city is not sufficient then marking the names I listed as {{citation needed}} would be reasonable. IMV removing them would be premature. In many cases I suspect that they do live there. A collegial approach would be to show that the entries are likely valid and that a more local reference might exist.

::::My concern is that I don't want to start a back and forth where I reintroduce or add something and you revert it back. GelvinM (talk) 02:41, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

:::::See WP:CCSG for inclusion criteria. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:26, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

Hello Magnolia677. I noticed that there is now a self published sources tag on the IBET PhD Project page. I am not entirely sure why. Could you please tell me what needs to be done to remove the message? I am not entirely sure what is an unreliable sources. The article has a lot of citations. And I can't seem to find a clear description of what a Tinkle tag is. Many thank. — Preceding unsigned comment added by DasFriskel (talk • contribs) 22:18, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

:{{ping|DasFriskel}} About a third of the sources are published by the university. I'd suggest finding more secondary sources. See also H:MTR. --Magnolia677 (talk) 22:22, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

::Thank you for clarifying. DasFriskel (talk) 22:30, 19 June 2025 (UTC)

:::Magnolia677, I found citations that were not related to the university, making significant changes. Could you please see if the tag can be lifted - and if not, let me know what else I can do? And if it is not too much of a bother, can you explain why images were lifted as well? It appears that these people are part of this program. Is it a copyright issue? Sorry again. I am trying to learn something new and appreciate your help. DasFriskel

::::{{ping|DasFriskel}} I checked [https://www.https//engineerscanada.ca/news-and-events/news/networking-and-mentorship-at-the-third-annual-ibet-conference one of the new sources you added], and it didn't work. When I figured out the error and accessed the link, it didn't support the content. Adding a bunch of new sources that don't actually support the content is disruptive. Regarding the images, my edit summaries were pretty clear. However, please see MOS:IMAGES, where a consensus of editors agreed that "Images must be significant and relevant in the topic's context, not primarily decorative." I interpret this to mean taking pictures of random students and staff, or of a large office building in which the organization's small office is located...does not improve the article. Going forward, please discuss these issues on the article talk page, where other editors can join in. Thank you. Magnolia677 (talk) 10:38, 20 June 2025 (UTC)

::::::::Thank you. I will check the link.

::::DasFriskel (talk) 12:42, 20 June 2025 (UTC)