User talk:Merseymale
Speedy deletion nomination of Pacific Drift
Hello Merseymale,
I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Pacific Drift for deletion, because the article doesn't clearly say why the subject is important enough to be included in an encyclopedia.
If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{urlencode:Talk:Pacific Drift}}&action=edit§ion=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks, Anir1uph | talk | contrib 17:08, 24 February 2013 (UTC)
Your question at the Help desk
{{helpdeskreply|1=|ts=23:19, 3 March 2013 (UTC)}}
A love supreme, U2
Hi. About your comment [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk%3AEdcolins&type=revision&diff=700961828&oldid=699503959 here] - first, we don't add things to Wikipedia that are not based on reliable sources (see WP:RS). Second, we think about what we call "weight" in articles - namely asking what is the article about, and how much space do we give to descriptions of various aspects of that subject? (see WP:WEIGHT) The article is about the album. The article already mentions its influence on U2. We don't need all the little details about how U2 expressed that influence - it is enough in this article that the influence is mentioned. I hope that makes sense. Jytdog (talk) 15:56, 23 January 2016 (UTC)
[[My Life in the Bush of Ghosts (album)]]
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
{{Ivmbox|Hello, Merseymale. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
|Scale of justice 2.svg|imagesize=40px}}
Disambiguation link notification for May 28
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Poison Ivy (musician), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Bass ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Poison_Ivy_%28musician%29 check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Poison_Ivy_%28musician%29?client=notify fix with Dab solver]). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:07, 28 May 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
Disambiguation link notification for April 8
An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Ornithopter, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Birdy ([//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dablinks.py/Ornithopter check to confirm] | [//dispenser.info.tm/~dispenser/cgi-bin/dab_solver.py/Ornithopter?client=notify fix with Dab solver]).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:50, 8 April 2020 (UTC)
I’ve long since Given up editing Wikipedia because of so many of my edits have been reverted using completely erroneous reasons thereby rendering Wikipedia less factual and yet there seems to be no way to explain my reasons or my detractors to explain their actions
There have been times when a year or two later someone else will make the same “mistake” I make and it’s, quite rightly, allowed to stand🤷♂️
Life is too short to engage in a pissing contest with the ignorant -YMMV🙄 Merseymale (talk) 00:35, 19 March 2022 (UTC)