User talk:Miamiller777

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Smetana (dairy product), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Slovak and Czech. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ{{*}} Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 19 April 2025 (UTC)

== Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot ==

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from {{User0|Nettrom}}, SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 03:09, 20 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi there, Miamiller777, and welcome to Women in Red. It's good to see you intend to help us improve Wikipedia's coverage of women. When you feel ready to create your first biography, you'll find some useful tips in our Ten Simple Rules. Please let me know if you run into any difficulties or need assistance. Happy editing!--Ipigott (talk) 13:02, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

:Thanks Miamiller777 (talk) 18:48, 21 April 2025 (UTC)

Hi, please see WP:OVERLINK. Two points, we try to avoid linking in quotations, and I don't think many if any readers wouldn't know what nakedness" means. Thanks. Doug Weller talk 07:43, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

:Okay, will check that. Miamiller777 (talk) 16:21, 25 April 2025 (UTC)

Greetings Miamiller777, I come to your talk page because of your recent edit in the article of White Mexicans[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=White_Mexicans&diff=1287281109&oldid=1282713884], on which you created a new section called "Overview" and left only one paragraph in the the article introduction, I think you went overboard by making the introuction so small, however, I must stress that I think the introduction could be shorter and could be better written in general and I hope we can discuss these changes in the next days. One such changes is to move the fourth introduction paragraph which talks about genetics to the part of the article that already talks about genetics, What do you think of this? Pob3qu3 (talk) 23:34, 27 April 2025 (UTC)

:Hello , I did check that , Actually The lede was too long and was hard to read, thats why i thought of splitting it to a new section. The lede was talking about demographics , genetics , their distribution and many more which is not even really elaborated in the article . Do you think that we should add more information from the "overview" section to the lede ? Miamiller777 (talk) 00:23, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

::Miamiller777 actually, I think its likely uneccessary, specially if we move the second and third paragraphs back up and the fourth one to the genetics section, because after that the section is going to be empty, or the introduction can go back to its previous state with four paragraphps, which is not excessive to be fair. Pob3qu3 (talk) 02:39, 28 April 2025 (UTC)

::I would apprecite that you answered (I hope you are not very bussy or that this is an inconvenience for you), as there are other edits to the introduction text that are needed and I think this is a good oportunity to discuss them. Pob3qu3 (talk) 00:38, 2 May 2025 (UTC)

::Miamiller777 as I've previously said, I understand if you are bussy and have no time to discuss, so could you at least state something along the lines of you not being interested in the topic anymore so I go and make the corrections that are long due?. Pob3qu3 (talk) 22:39, 4 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Hi, sorry for the late reply , I think you can make the appropriate changes , If you feel that is right for the article. Miamiller777 (talk) 06:04, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

:::Much apprecited Miamiller777, already working on it. Pob3qu3 (talk) 09:05, 5 May 2025 (UTC)

--Lajmmoore (talk 09:21, 29 April 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging

Hi Miammiller777,

"Overlink" has a special meaning: see WP:OVERLINK, and is indeed something we should try to avoid. However, removing red links, which is what you have been doing, is generally not appropriate. See WP:REDLINK. DMacks (talk) 11:35, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

:okay Noted, Thankyou for informing , I thought this would also come under overlinking. Miamiller777 (talk) 12:12, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

::Hi! Regarding chemical bonding, we don't generally add See Also links to topics covered and linked in the article, as discussed in the Manual of Style. This may be different from say paper encyclopedias you may have seen. Johnjbarton (talk) 16:48, 7 May 2025 (UTC)

:::okay Noted. Miamiller777 (talk) 07:59, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

::::If you need any help with anything just ask, btw when you’ve had an account for 6 months and reach 500 edits you get access to the WP:Wikipedia Library which gives you access to all the main journals and publishers Kowal2701 (talk) 09:18, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::Thank you so much for your guidance, I will make use of that. I was actually planning to work on creating a new article.I have noted all the points. Once again thanks. Miamiller777 (talk) 09:38, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::No worries, you might find WP:AFC helpful although they have a pretty big backlog atm Kowal2701 (talk) 09:49, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

::::::Also Help:Your first article Kowal2701 (talk) 10:02, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

:::::::Thankyou, Means a lot :) Miamiller777 (talk) 10:04, 8 May 2025 (UTC)

File:Information.svg Hi Miamiller777! I noticed that you recently made an edit and marked it as "minor", but it may not have been. "Minor edit" has a specific definition on Wikipedia: it refers only to superficial edits that could never be the subject of a dispute, such as typo corrections or reverting obvious vandalism. Any edit that changes the meaning of an article is not a minor edit, even if it only concerns a single word. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 14:59, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

:Hi, Today I mostly linked related topics and added very small contents and corrected typos. Can you please point out the article and the edit so that I can improve , I have noted this anyways, thanks for informing. Miamiller777 (talk) 15:26, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

::[https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Primolius&diff=prev&oldid=1289566388 This edit] would be one. It's not a big deal, and you're right that these are small edits, it's just often unclear to new users what Wikipedia means by "minor edit" so I thought I'd give you the explanation template. --Belbury (talk) 15:47, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

:well i just checked . I thought since candy making is added in the see also page, Baking would also fit there since the overall topic is related to that . Miamiller777 (talk) 15:29, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

::The confectionery store article is about stores that sell candy. Baking seems only indirectly related to that, to me. --Belbury (talk) 15:47, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

:::No problem , I have noted that anyways . Miamiller777 (talk) 15:48, 9 May 2025 (UTC)

--Lajmmoore (talk 06:04, 29 May 2025 (UTC) via MassMessaging