User talk:Mohamed Ouda#Paid editing

{{unblock reviewed|accept=This unblock requests is pretty lousy, but the comments below are more compelling. The original blocking admins have both departed the project so it is left to us to decide whether to grant a second chance, and I have decided to go ahead and do that. Obviously, any return to any kind of promotional editing, paid or not, will result in a reblock.

Welcome back. Beeblebrox ^Beebletalks 19:31, 3 February 2025 (UTC)|1=I am blocked now for more than 5 years now and , I kindly ask for just another chance to demonstrate that I have learned from my mistakes . and my mindset totally changed and I need to contribute again in this project without violating Wikipedia's polices. If there’s any additional information I can provide or actions I can take to show my commitment, I am more than willing to do so. Mohamed Ouda (talk)}}

Nothing has changed; as I said before, you should go into detail about why you lied about your actions, why you failed to disclose your paid editing, and why we should now trust you. You've been told this before; if you are unable or unwilling to do this, this will probably be your last request. 331dot (talk) 12:35, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

Thank you 331dot for your response. please find my answers below

Why I lied about my actions:

At the time of my mistakes, I acted rashly and made poor decisions. I was caught up in a mindset where I thought I could handle things without fully realizing the impact of my actions on Wikipedia . I now understand that lying about my actions was a serious breach of trust, and I deeply regret that.

Why I failed to disclose my paid editing:

My failure to disclose my paid editing was due to ignorance and poor judgment. At the time, I didn’t understand the importance of disclosing paid contributions. but Since then, I’ve taken the time to learn about Wikipedia’s policies, especially about paid editing. I now understand that being transparent is not just a rule, but essential to keeping Wikipedia trusted. I sincerely apologize for not following these guidelines earlier.

Why you should now trust me:

I know trust is hard to be earned again , but I hope in a second chance. Since my block, I’ve taken steps to educate myself about Wikipedia's policies. I fully understand the importance of adhering to the rules of the community, and I am committed to contributing in good and transparent manner. Mohamed Ouda (talk) 13:06, 3 February 2025 (UTC)

• {{ping|331dot}} & {{ping|Beeblebrox}} this editor has had 2 articles deleted under WP:G11 due to promotional editing recently and then tried to recreate the deleted article directly in the mainspace shortly after being speedy-deleted. Best, GPL93 (talk) 16:19, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello Mohamed Ouda, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

While your contributions are appreciated, I wanted to let you know that I've started a discussion about whether an article that you created, Shaimaa Gamal, should be deleted, as I am not sure that it is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia in its current form. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Shaimaa Gamal.

Deletion discussions usually run for seven days and are not votes. Our guide about effectively contributing to such discussions is worth a read. The most common issue in these discussions is notability, but it's not the only aspect that may be discussed; read the nomination and any other comments carefully before you contribute to the discussion. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.

If you have any questions, please leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|CSMention269}}. And don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ . Thanks!

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

☮️Counter-Strike:Mention 269🕉️^{(🗨️ ● ✉️ ● 📔)} 06:23, 5 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning pn.svg

{{Quote box|quote=

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on :Nile ritz carlton, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the {{Querylink|Special:Log|qs=type=delete&page=Nile+ritz+carlton|deleting administrator}}. Sophisticatedevening ^(talk) 17:27, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

:@Sophisticatedevening . hello it is a historical Hotel in Cairo opened in 1959 . Mohamed Ouda (talk) 17:59, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to Nile ritz carlton. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and it needs independent sources.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. bonadea contributions talk 22:10, 9 March 2025 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

Hi @Bonadea I added more reliable references now , I hope it is fine now Mohamed Ouda (talk) 13:29, 11 March 2025 (UTC)

Hello Mohamed Ouda,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged InstaPay for deletion, because it seems to be promotional, rather than an encyclopedia article.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted and want more time to work on it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title={{urlencode:Talk:InstaPay}}&action=edit§ion=new&preload=Template:Hangon_preload&preloadtitle=This+page+should+not+be+speedy+deleted+because...+ contest this deletion], but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Thanks!

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

GrabUp - Talk 14:43, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

Thanks for your contributions to InstaPay. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability, it is promotional and reads like an advertisement and you may have a possible Conflict of Interest.

I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page.

When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit for review" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. GPL93 (talk) 16:15, 18 March 2025 (UTC)

File:Ambox warning yellow.svg

The article :Ibrahim Shika has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

His dead is sad but the article does not meet WP:notability.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{Tlc|proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Rolluik (talk) 19:49, 12 April 2025 (UTC)

I think he meets the WP:notability . as He was football player in Zamalek SC on of the biggest football clubs in Egypt Mohamed Ouda (talk) 19:57, 12 April 2025 (UTC)