User talk:Mpwiesner

{{Talk header}}

Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:Society of Catholic Scientists|Society of Catholic Scientists]] (June 15)

File:AFC-Logo_Decline.svgYour recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was:

{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.|}} The comment the reviewer left was:

{{divbox|blue|3=4 of the 9 sources are to their own website we need more independent sources we are not interested in what they say about themselves}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

{{clear}}

  • If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Society of Catholic Scientists and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
  • If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Society of Catholic Scientists, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
  • If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Society_of_Catholic_Scientists Articles for creation help desk] or on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Theroadislong&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:Society_of_Catholic_Scientists reviewer's talk page].
  • You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Theroadislong (talk) 16:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

style="margin: 0.4em 2em;"
style="vertical-align: top;"

| alt=Teahouse logo

|

Hello, Mpwiesner!

Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 16:51, 15 June 2018 (UTC)

Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC

[[Draft:Society of Catholic Scientists]] concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Society of Catholic Scientists, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:23, 14 March 2020 (UTC)

Society of Catholic Scientists has been nominated for Did You Know

{{ivmbox

| 1 = Hello, Mpwiesner. Society of Catholic Scientists, an article you either created or to which you significantly contributed, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of {{DYK blue}}. You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. EnterpriseyBot (talk!) 12:01, 25 June 2021 (UTC)

|2=Updated DYK query.svg

|imagesize=40px

}}

DYK for Society of Catholic Scientists

{{ivmbox

|image = Updated DYK query.svg

|imagesize=40px

|text = On 14 July 2021, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Society of Catholic Scientists, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Society of Catholic Scientists sponsors Gold Masses, following the tradition of Red Masses for lawyers, White Masses for those in healthcare, and Blue Masses for public-safety professionals? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Society of Catholic Scientists. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, [//pageviews.toolforge.org/?start=2021-07-04&end=2021-07-24&project=en.wikipedia.org&pages=Society_of_Catholic_Scientists Society of Catholic Scientists]), and if they received a combined total of at least 416.7 views per hour (i.e., 5,000 views in 12 hours or 10,000 in 24), the hook may be added to the statistics page. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

}} Cwmhiraeth (talk) 12:03, 14 July 2021 (UTC)