User talk:Nice0903
{{Talk header}}
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:PBS Systems|PBS Systems]] (February 24)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}}{{divbox|gray|3=This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PBS Systems and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PBS Systems, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:PBS_Systems Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:Sulfurboy&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:PBS_Systems reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
| style="margin: 0.4em 2em;" |
| style="vertical-align: top;"
| Hello, Nice0903!
Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Sulfurboy (talk) 16:07, 24 February 2020 (UTC) |
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation through AfC
Your submission at [[Wikipedia:Articles for creation|Articles for creation]]: [[Draft:PBS Systems|PBS Systems]] (March 6)
{{divbox|gray|3=This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.|}}{{divbox|gray|3=This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.|}} Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
{{clear}}
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:PBS Systems and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:PBS Systems, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{tl|Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:WikiProject_Articles_for_creation/Help_desk&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:PBS_Systems Articles for creation help desk], on the [//en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=User_talk:DGG&action=edit§ion=new&nosummary=1&preload=Template:Afc_decline/HD_preload&preloadparams%5B%5D=Draft:PBS_Systems reviewer's talk page] or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your post at the Teahouse
Hi, Nice0903, your post at the Teahouse has received some replies. Would you care to respond there to let the volunteers know whether you found the information helpful? Pelagic (talk) 11:40, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Hi Pelagic, Thanks! I just logged in and saw their replies. I did respond already. Nice0903 (talk) 17:36, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Welcome!
Category:Wikipedians who have received a Teahouse invitation
Hello, Nice0903, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
- Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- How to add those all-important references
- Simplified Manual of Style
- The Signpost, our newspaper.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (
Your thread has been archived
| style="margin: 1em 4em;" |
| valign="top"
| Hi Nice0903! You created a thread called {{tq|Draft reviewed twice but both declined with the same reasons}} at Wikipedia:Teahouse, but it has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days. You can still find the archived discussion here. If you have any additional questions that weren't answered then, please [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:Teahouse&action=edit§ion=new&preloadtitle={{urlencode:Follow-up to Draft reviewed twice but both declined with the same reasons}} create a new thread]. Archival by {{noping|Lowercase sigmabot III}}, notification delivery by {{noping|Muninnbot}}, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{tlx|bots|deny{{=}}Muninnbot}} (ban this bot) or {{tlx|nobots}} (ban all bots) on your user talk page. Muninnbot (talk) 19:01, 10 March 2020 (UTC) |
Help me!
{{help me-helped}}
Please help me with notability and reliable sources. The page I've created was rejected twice due to notability and it read as advertisement. Appreciate your help.Thanks!
Nice0903 (talk) 16:08, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
:Nice0903, hello. My name here is Eggishorn and I hope I can help with your question. Writing new articles on a business is a difficult task and involves many rules but the most important one is that Wikipedia is neither a directory of every company nor is it a platform for advertising companies. I'm not saying that you were doing that, just that that policy informs every reviewer of a new article about a company. When I look at the draft article Draft:PBS Systems I see that the reviewers left you notes about notability "Notability " on Wikipedia has a meaning that is different from the use of that word in regular English. Here it generally means that there is significant coverage of a article topic (person, company, etc.) in reliable sources that are independent of the topic itself.
:Of the 10 sources your draft cites, sources 1, 3, and 5, are directly from the company. Sources 4, 6, 7, and 8 (all the Canadian Auto World cites) are also questionable. While they are published by an industry outlet, they are obviously in form simply reprinted press releases. Source 10 is unverifiable, which breaks a core rule for sources. That leaves source 2, which also comes from that same industry outlet and is very promotional. In short, none of the sources show that there's any reason anyone not directly connected to the company would want to know about them. This is why the draft has been rejected.
:If you still want to try to create this article then you will need to provide sources that don't have those same flaws and you will have to be more balanced in the text. Phrases like "...was designed from the outset to centre around the customer, rather than a departmental transaction" are more suited for a software release announcement than an encyclopedia. I hope this helps. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 17:56, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Thank you. I really appreciate your help. I will stop here for now and revisit once we have a reliable sources. how can I request to delete my draft? Thanks
Nice0903 (talk) 19:22, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
:Nice0903, I would suggest that simply leave it alone. Abandoned drafts are automatically deleted after 6 months. The deletion of drafts that only one author has contributed to is generally non-controversial but there have been other people who have made edits to this draft. It is probably best to let the normal clean-up take its course. Eggishorn (talk) (contrib) 20:29, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Thank you:)
[[Draft:PBS Systems]] concern
Hi there, I'm MDanielsBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:PBS Systems, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.
If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.
You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.
If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.
Thank you for your attention. MDanielsBot (talk) 01:35, 7 August 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, [[Draft:PBS Systems]]
Hello, Nice0903. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "PBS Systems".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply {{edit|Draft:PBS Systems|edit the submission}} and remove the {{tlc|db-afc}}, {{tlc|db-draft}}, or {{tlc|db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! —Nnadigoodluck🇳🇬 00:32, 7 September 2020 (UTC)
Your draft article, [[Draft:PBS Systems]]
Hello, Nice0903. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "PBS Systems".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can [https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_undeletion/G13?withJS=MediaWiki:G13-restore-wizard.js&page=Draft%3APBS+Systems request its undeletion]. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz Read! Talk! 22:02, 6 June 2022 (UTC)